| SNo. |
Registration No |
Appellate Authority Name |
Received date |
Reply Appeal |
Reply Doc |
| 21 |
CICOM/A/P/23/00188 |
Ms. ROOP AVTAR KAUR |
28-11-2023 |
Ref RTI No.-CICOM/R/P/23/00415
GROUNDS FOR FIRST APPEAL:
The Appellant submitted first appeal stating that
“I am to invite your kind attention towards my RTI application dated 26.07.2023 submitted to PIO CIC New Delhi, and to say that the requisite information has not been provided by the PIO. Hence it is deemed refused.
You are requested to take action under RTI Act and provide the information please."
DECISION OF FIRST APPELLATE AUTHORITY:
The First Appeal, RTI application and reply given by CPIO of CIC have been perused.
As per the current status, the attachment to the reply of RTI application dated 17.08.2023 has been uploaded on the portal and hard copy of the attachment sent through Dak /speed post on 08.12.2023 by the CPIO. Hence, no intervention is required on behalf of the FAA in this matter.
The appeal is disposed of accordingly. |
NA |
| 22 |
CICOM/A/P/23/00189 |
Ms. ROOP AVTAR KAUR |
28-11-2023 |
Ref RTI No.-CICOM/R/P/23/00523
The Appellant submitted first appeal stating that
“I am to invite your kind attention the File No. CICOM/R/P/23/00523 My RTI application dated submitted to PIO CIC New Delhi has not mentioned, and to say that the requisite information provided by the PIO is misleading.
You are requested to take action under RTI Act and provide the information please."
DECISION OF FIRST APPELLATE AUTHORITY:
The First Appeal, RTI application and reply given by CPIO of CIC have been perused.
As per Section 2(f) of the RTI Act, 2005 only such information as is available and existing and held by the public authority or is under control of the public authority can be provided by a PIO. The PIO is not supposed to create or collate information that is not a part of the record.
Accordingly, the reply given by the CPIO is appropriate and as per the provisions of the RTI Act, 2005. Hence, no intervention is required on behalf of the FAA in this matter.
The appeal is disposed of accordingly. |
NA |
| 23 |
CICOM/A/P/23/00190 |
Ms. ROOP AVTAR KAUR |
28-11-2023 |
Ref RTI No.-CICOM/R/P/23/00524
GROUNDS FOR FIRST APPEAL:
The Appellant submitted first appeal stating that
“I am to invite your kind attention the File No. CICOM/R/P/23/00524 My RTI application dated submitted to PIO CIC New Delhi has not mentioned, and to say that the requisite information provided by the PIO is misleading.
You are requested to take action under RTI Act and provide the information please."
DECISION OF FIRST APPELLATE AUTHORITY:
The First Appeal, RTI application and reply given by CPIO of CIC have been perused.
As per Section 2(f) of the RTI Act, 2005 only such information as is available and existing and held by the public authority or is under control of the public authority can be provided by a PIO. The PIO is not supposed to create or collate information that is not a part of the record.
Accordingly, the reply given by the CPIO is appropriate and as per the provisions of the RTI Act, 2005. Hence, no intervention is required on behalf of the FAA in this matter.
The appeal is disposed of accordingly. |
NA |
| 24 |
CICOM/A/E/23/00401 |
Ms. ROOP AVTAR KAUR |
12-11-2023 |
Ref RTI No. - CICOM/R/E/23/01201
GROUNDS FOR FIRST APPEAL:
The Appellant submitted first appeal stating that
"Dear Sir/Madam, The applicant had filed second appeal which was returned to him due to some irrelevant attachments in place of RTI application and first appeal as informed to him by CPIO in his reply. But CPIO has not provided the copy of that irrelevant documents submitted by mistake while applicant wants to know that which irrelevant documents are submitted by him instead of relevant documents. The second appeal is successfully submitted by the applicant, it means there is something else attached by the applicant instead of RTI application and first appeal. Therefore, kindly direct CPIO to provide the copy of those documents and name of pdf files attached by the applicant by mistake due to which second appeal is returned to him. Regards,"
DECISION OF FIRST APPELLATE AUTHORITY:
The First Appeal, RTI application and reply given by CPIO of CIC have been perused.
As per Section 2(f) of the RTI Act, 2005 only such information as is available and existing and held by the public authority or is under control of the public authority can be provided by a PIO. The PIO is not supposed to create or collate information that is not a part of the record.
Accordingly, the reply given by the CPIO is appropriate and as per the provisions of the RTI Act,2005. Hence, no intervention is required on behalf of the FAA in this matter.
The appeal is disposed of accordingly. |
NA |
| 25 |
CICOM/A/E/23/00390 |
Ms. ROOP AVTAR KAUR |
02-11-2023 |
Ref RTI No. - CICOM/R/E/23/00780
GROUNDS FOR FIRST APPEAL:
The Appellant submitted first appeal stating that
"Provided incomplete misleading or false information. Kindly provide complete and correct information."
DECISION OF FIRST APPELLATE AUTHORITY:
The First Appeal, RTI application and reply given by CPIO of CIC have been perused.
As per Section 2(f) of the RTI Act, 2005 only such information as is available and existing and held by the public authority or is under control of the public authority can be provided by a PIO. The PIO is not supposed to create or collate information that is not a part of the record.
Accordingly, the reply given by the CPIO is appropriate and as per the provisions of the RTI Act,2005. Hence, no intervention is required on behalf of the FAA in this matter.
The appeal is disposed of accordingly. |
NA |
| 26 |
CICOM/A/E/23/00350 |
Ms. ROOP AVTAR KAUR |
19-09-2023 |
Ref RTI No.- CICOM/R/E/23/01017
GROUNDS FOR FIRST APPEAL:
The Appellant submitted first appeal stating that
"To The FAA, CIC, New Delhi. As anticipated, the so called reply provided by CPIO makes no legal sense in itself and not replied not in accordance with the very content of RTI in question and hence, this Appeal."
DECISION OF THE FIRST APPELLATE AUTHORITY:
The First Appeal, RTI application and reply given by CPIO of CIC have been perused.
As per Section 2(f) of the RTI Act, 2005 only such information as is available and existing and held by the public authority or is under control of the public authority can be provided by a PIO. The PIO is not supposed to create or collate information that is not a part of the record.
Accordingly, the reply given by the CPIO is appropriate and as per the provisions of the RTI Act,2005. Hence, no intervention is required on behalf of the FAA in this matter.
The appeal is disposed of accordingly. |
NA |
| 27 |
CICOM/A/E/23/00345 |
Ms. ROOP AVTAR KAUR |
12-09-2023 |
Ref RTI No.- CICOM/R/E/23/00958
GROUNDS FOR FIRST APPEAL:
The Appellant submitted first appeal stating that
"The CPIO give incomplete information, as no inspection of file was allowed to me as requested in my RTI application."
DECISION OF THE FIRST APPELLATE AUTHORITY:
The First Appeal, RTI application and reply given by CPIO of CIC have been perused.
In the instant case, CPIO (DR to IC-UM) is directed to revisit the RTI application, as per the provisions of the RTI Act, 2005 by 20.10.2023.
The appeal is disposed of accordingly. |
NA |
| 28 |
CICOM/A/E/23/00346 |
Ms. ROOP AVTAR KAUR |
12-09-2023 |
Ref RTI No.- CICOM/R/E/23/00930
GROUNDS FOR FIRST APPEAL:
The Appellant submitted first appeal stating that
"Sir kindly to be admitted an appeal under section 19 of RTI act - Ground are below as on:- 1. CPIO has been provided any information as per request dt 12.8 23 through online/ email or other mode. Yet. 2. CPIO has been provided any information within stipulated period under provision of the RTI act. 3. CPIO has not response according to law and RTI rules. Regards Hence sir please directioted to CPIO to furnish asked information as per request. I shall be everpray to you for kindness of the Act."
DECISION OF THE FIRST APPELLATE AUTHORITY:
The First Appeal, RTI application and reply given by CPIO of CIC have been perused.
In the instant case, the information has already been shared by the CPIO on 12.09.2023 on email . Hence, no intervention is required on behalf of the FAA in this matter.
The appeal is disposed of accordingly. |
NA |
| 29 |
CICOM/A/P/23/00133 |
Ms. ROOP AVTAR KAUR |
11-09-2023 |
Ref RTI No.- CICOM/R/P/23/00328
DECISION OF FIRST APPELLATE AUTHORITY:
The First Appeal, RTI application and reply given by CPIO of CIC have been perused.
As per Section 2(f) of the RTI Act, 2005 only such information as is available and existing and held by the public authority or is under control of the public authority can be provided by a PIO. The PIO is not supposed to create or collate information that is not a part of the record.
Accordingly, the reply given by the CPIO is appropriate and as per the provisions of the RTI Act, 2005. Hence, no intervention is required on behalf of the FAA in this matter.
The appeal is disposed of accordingly. |
NA |
| 30 |
CICOM/A/P/23/00134 |
Ms. ROOP AVTAR KAUR |
11-09-2023 |
Ref RTI No.- CICOM/R/P/23/00389
GROUNDS FOR FIRST APPEAL:
The Appellant submitted first appeal stating that
“Not yet received RTI reply from your office in the matter of RTI Application dated 22-08-2023. Copy of RTI Application dated 22-07-2023 is attached herewith.
Deemed refusal to reply – RTI application dated 22-07-2023 delivered at your office on 24/07/2023 vide Speed post No EM 684829334IN at 14:59:55.â€
DECISION OF FIRST APPELLATE AUTHORITY:
The First Appeal, RTI application and reply given by CPIO of CIC have been perused.
As per Section 2(f) of the RTI Act, 2005 only such information as is available and existing and held by the public authority or is under control of the public authority can be provided by a PIO. The PIO is not supposed to create or collate information that is not a part of the record.
In the instant case, the CPIO furnished reply to the RTI application on 30.08.2023 i.e. within the prescribed time limit as per the provisions of the RTI Act, 2005, but as mentioned by the appellant in the first appeal of non-receipt of the reply, a copy of the RTI reply is being attached with this order.
Accordingly, the reply given by the CPIO is appropriate and as per the provisions of the RTI Act, 2005. Hence, no intervention is required on behalf of the FAA in this matter.
The appeal is disposed of accordingly. |
NA |