| SNo. |
Registration No |
Appellate Authority Name |
Received date |
Reply Appeal |
Reply Doc |
| 1031 |
CICOM/A/2018/00211 |
AJITKUMAR VASANTRAO SONTAKKE |
10-09-2018 |
please see the file |
 |
| 1032 |
CICOM/A/2018/60141 |
AJITKUMAR VASANTRAO SONTAKKE |
10-09-2018 |
please see the file |
|
| 1033 |
CICOM/A/2018/60140 |
AJITKUMAR VASANTRAO SONTAKKE |
09-09-2018 |
Please see attachment |
|
| 1034 |
CICOM/A/2018/60139 |
AJITKUMAR VASANTRAO SONTAKKE |
08-09-2018 |
In response to Point 5 regarding process of complaint filed against CIC, Shri Krishan Avtar Talwar, CPIO & DS to CR-1 copy of the guidelines for filing Second Appeal and Complaint against any public authority including Central Information Commission. In the appeal, appellant has stated that:-
“As your reply guidelines for complaint you provide me but provide me also gazette copy in which these guidelines publish or where I get these gazette in which guidelines for complaintâ€
In this regard, Shri Talwar has been called for who informed that he has provided a copy of the guidelines for registration of Second Appeal and Complaint issued vide office order No.CIC/CR-1/2017/0007 (pt.2) dated 14.06.2018. These guidelines are also available in the website of the Commission under link cic.gov.in/sites/default/files/Circulars %26Noification/OFFICE ORDER.pdf.
In view of the above, appeal is disposed of. |
NA |
| 1035 |
CICOM/A/2018/00210 |
AJITKUMAR VASANTRAO SONTAKKE |
07-09-2018 |
please see the file |
|
| 1036 |
CICOM/A/2018/60138 |
AJITKUMAR VASANTRAO SONTAKKE |
06-09-2018 |
In the RTI application, appellant has sought certified copy of all documents of case File No.CIC/EPFOG/A/2018/140842 and CIC/CCITJ/A/2018/143188. Shri K.L. Das, CPIO & DR to IC(BJ) vide letter dated 06.09.2018 has furnished reply concerning case file No. CIC/CCITJ/A/2018/143188 and Shri T.K. Mohapatra, CPIO & DR to IC(SA) vide online reply dated 29.08.2018 furnished reply in case file No.CIC/EPFOG/A/2018/140842. Both CPIO’s stated that the above said case files are of Ms. Aashima Goyal, therefore, notice u/s 11(1) of the RTI Act sent to her and she objected for disclosure of the information to the appellant. Accordingly, information sought by the appellant denied u/s 8(1)(j) of the RTI Act by both CPIOs.
On perusal of the RTI application, CPIOs’ reply and appeal, it is observed that the appellant has not established any larger public interest in disclosure of information, therefore, FAA is in agreement with the reply furnished by both the CPIOs. |
NA |
| 1037 |
CICOM/A/2018/00206 |
AJITKUMAR VASANTRAO SONTAKKE |
04-09-2018 |
please see the file |
|
| 1038 |
CICOM/A/2018/00207 |
AJITKUMAR VASANTRAO SONTAKKE |
04-09-2018 |
please see the file |
|
| 1039 |
CICOM/A/2018/00208 |
AJITKUMAR VASANTRAO SONTAKKE |
04-09-2018 |
please see the file |
|
| 1040 |
CICOM/A/2018/00209 |
AJITKUMAR VASANTRAO SONTAKKE |
04-09-2018 |
please see the file |
|