There are serious errors in your form submission, please see below for details.

Search RTI Appeal

List of RTI Appeal

SNo. Registration No Appellate Authority Name Received date Reply Appeal Reply Doc
141 CICOM/A/E/20/00196 Ms. ROOP AVTAR KAUR 29-10-2020 On going through the RTI Application, the reply sent by the CPIO and the First Appeal filed by the Appellant, it is observed that the Appellant, through his RTI Application, giving reference of an RTI No. NPCOI/R/X/20/00012 dated 22.09.2020, requested to investigate into the matter and provide him information regarding the name of the person, his Account No. and other details, who had filed the above RTI application in the name of the Appellant by using his e-mail and other details. The CPIO, CIC, Sh. Ram Kumar, RTI Cell, in his reply dated 23.10.2020 informed the Appellant that, “Central Information Commission does not have the information. You may approach the concerned Public Authority. Central Information Commission is the Second Appellant Authority for the RTIs filed with the Departments/Ministries under Central government and UTs of India. Central Information Commission is located at the above address. It has no regional office.” In his First Appeal, the Appellant has not expressed his dissatisfaction with the reply sent by the CPIO, but he has requested to provide above information after getting the matter investigated. It is worth mentioning, that under the provisions of Section 2(f) of the RTI Act, only such information, as is available and existing and held by the public authority or is under control of the public authoritycan be provided by a PIO.The PIO is not supposed to create information that is not a part of the record. He is also not required to interpret information or furnished replies to the hypothetical questions. Similarly, redressal of grievance is also outside the purview of the Act. Hence, the information sent by the CPIO is factual and per the provision of RTI Act, 2005. The Appellant, if wishes, may approach to the competent authority for getting his grievance redressed. NA
142 CICOM/A/E/20/00197 Ms. ROOP AVTAR KAUR 29-10-2020 Ongoing through the RTI Application, the reply sent by the CPIO and the First Appeal filed by the Appellant it is observed that the Appellant has asked for clarification as to whether the Kolkata High Court comes under the jurisdiction of Govt. of India or not, if not, then it comes under the jurisdiction of which government including the name of their Public Information Officer, First Appellate Authority under RTI Act and the name of the next Appellate Authority to whom appeals can be filed against the response of the Appellate Authority of Kolkata High Court. The CPIO, CIC, RTI Cell, in his reply dated 23.10.2020 advised the Appellant to visit the website of Kolkata High Court for all the details. The Appellant in his First Appeal has stated that he did not find any information on the website of Kolkata High Court. He has requested to direct the CPIO, CIC to provide the desired information. It is worth mentioning that as per the provision of Section 2(f) of RTI Act, 2005 only such information as is available and existing and held by the public authority or is under control of the public authoritycan be provided by a PIO. The PIO is not supposed to create or collect information that is not a part of the record. He is also not required to interpret information.Hence, the reply sent by the CPIO, CIC is as per the provision of RTI Act, 2005 and therefore, no intervention is required on behalf of the FAA in this matter. However, the Appellant, if he wishes, may approach the concerned public authority for desired information. NA
143 CICOM/A/E/20/00198 Ms. ROOP AVTAR KAUR 29-10-2020 On going through the RTI Application, the reply sent by the CPIO and the First Appeal filed by the Appellant it is observed that the Appellant has asked for following information: 1. Total number and list of all pending cases registered in the year 2018 and prior as on current date of this RTI by the DR Shri Assija. 2. Ground available in records along with proof based upon which S. No. 1 hearing is not scheduled by the DR thereby violating section 4.1.b.iv.of CIC. 3. Total number and list of all pending cases registered in the year 2018 and prior as on date of disposal of this RTI by the DR Shri Assija. 4. Total number and list of all legal notices received by CIC from the advocate of applicants or complainants pertaining to violation of Section 4.1.iv. of CIC. 5. Copies of all documents which were prepared, executed, issued, and received pertaining to S. No. 4 along with file noting and signatures of the officials. 6. Action taken closure report for S. No. 4. In response to queries no. 1 to 3, the CPIO, MR Section, CIC provided following information to the Appellant “Point no. 1 (a) This information can be viewed from the CIC website link.(https://cic.gov.in/monthly-registered-and-returned-cases). (b) This information can be viewed from the CIC website link.(https://dsscic.nic.in.in/cause-list-report-web/view-pending-cases). Point no. 2 & 3 information will be forwarded to you by the concerned Deputy Registrar shortly.” In response to queries no. 4 to 6, the CPIO, Legal Cell, CIC vide his letter dated 29.10.2020 informed the Appellant that, “Information sought in your RTI Application is personal in nature and no public interest is involved. Hence, information is denied under Section 8(1)(J) of RTI Act, 2005.” The Appellant in his First Appeal has said that the “PIO is obstructing information deliberately, knowingly and with mala-fide intentions in order to promote corruption in the department of CIC.” It is worth mentioning that as per the provision of Section 2(f) of RTI Act, 2005 only such information as is available and existing and held by the public authority or is under control of the public authoritycan be provided by a PIO. The PIO is not supposed to create or collect information that is not a part of the record. Hence, the reply sent by the CPIO, CIC, MR Section is as per the provision of RTI Act, 2005. Further, the information asked for against point no. 4 to 6 is personal information, which is exempted u/s 8(1)(j) of RTI Act and the Appellant has not given any justification as to how the disclosure of these information will serve the larger public interest. Therefore, no intervention is required on behalf of the FAA in this matter. NA
144 CICOM/A/E/20/00194 Ms. ROOP AVTAR KAUR 27-10-2020 On going through the RTI Application, the reply sent by the CPIO and the First Appeal filed by the Appellant, it is observed that the Appellant, through his RTI Application, asked for digital copies of Action Taken Reports (ATR) received from all the ministries/departments including public authorities under state governments”, in respect to guidelines dated 05th November, 2019, issued by DoP&T regarding suo-motu disclosure under Section 4 of Right to Information Act, 2005. The CPIO, CIC, Sh. Kishore Kumar Pukharal, Legal Cell, through his reply dated 27.10.2020, informed the Appellant that, “No record for the information as sought, is available.” In his First Appeal, the Appellant has stated, “I was denied to the information I sought. Kindly order CPIO to provide the information in a digitised format.” It is worth mentioning, that under the provisions of Section 2(f) of the RTI Act, only such information, as is available and existing and held by the public authority or is under control of the public authoritycan be provided by a PIO.He is also not required to interpret information or furnished replies to the hypothetical questions. Hence, the reply sent by the CPIO is factual and as per the provision of RTI Act, 2005. Therefore, no intervention is required on behalf of the undersigned in this matter NA
145 CICOM/A/P/20/00096 AJITKUMAR VASANTRAO SONTAKKE 23-10-2020 Please see the file. download pdf
146 CICOM/A/P/20/00093 Ms. ROOP AVTAR KAUR 23-10-2020 Please see the file. download pdf
147 CICOM/A/P/20/00094 Ms. ROOP AVTAR KAUR 23-10-2020 Please see the file. download pdf
148 CICOM/A/P/20/00095 Ms. ROOP AVTAR KAUR 23-10-2020 Please see the file. download pdf
149 CICOM/A/P/20/00097 Ms. ROOP AVTAR KAUR 23-10-2020 Please see the file. download pdf
150 CICOM/A/P/20/00098 Ms. ROOP AVTAR KAUR 23-10-2020 Please see the file. download pdf