| SNo. |
Registration No |
Appellate Authority Name |
Received date |
Reply Appeal |
Reply Doc |
| 301 |
CICOM/A/P/20/00050 |
Ms. ROOP AVTAR KAUR |
24-06-2020 |
Please see the file. |
 |
| 302 |
CICOM/A/P/20/00049 |
Ms. ROOP AVTAR KAUR |
24-06-2020 |
Please see the file. |
|
| 303 |
CICOM/A/P/20/00047 |
Ms. ROOP AVTAR KAUR |
23-06-2020 |
Please see the file. |
|
| 304 |
CICOM/A/E/20/00086 |
Ms. ROOP AVTAR KAUR |
20-06-2020 |
On perusal of the Appeal, RTI application and reply of the CPIO, it is observed that the information given by the CPIO is as per information sought by the Appellant through his online RTI application. Therefore, no further intervention is required on the part of FAA in the matter. |
NA |
| 305 |
CICOM/A/E/20/00081 |
AJITKUMAR VASANTRAO SONTAKKE |
18-06-2020 |
On perusal of the Appeal and RTI application, it is observed that Appellant has filed online RTI application on 04.06.2020 and first appeal has been filed on 18.06.2020. As per provision under Section 7 (1) of RTI Act, 2005, CPIO has to reply within 30 da |
NA |
| 306 |
CICOM/A/E/20/00082 |
Ms. ROOP AVTAR KAUR |
18-06-2020 |
On perusal of the Appeal, RTI application and reply of the CPIO, it is observed that the information given by the CPIO is not as information sought by the Appellant. CPIO has explained the process of preparing of CIC order, while Appellant has sought photocopy of the file, including noting. Accordingly, direction is being given to Sh. B. S. Kasana, CPIO & DO to IC (AP) to revisit the matter and provide appropriate information as per provisions of RTI Act, 2005, within 10 days of receipt of this order. |
NA |
| 307 |
CICOM/A/E/20/00083 |
Ms. ROOP AVTAR KAUR |
18-06-2020 |
On perusal of the Appeal, RTI application and reply of the CPIO, it is observed that the information given by the CPIO is as per RTI Act, 2005. Therefore, no further intervention is required on the part of FAA in the matter. |
NA |
| 308 |
CICOM/A/E/20/00084 |
Ms. ROOP AVTAR KAUR |
18-06-2020 |
On perusal of the Appeal, RTI application and reply of the CPIO, it is observed that the information given by the CPIO is as per RTI Act, 2005. Therefore, no further intervention is required on the part of FAA in the matter. |
NA |
| 309 |
CICOM/A/E/20/00085 |
Ms. ROOP AVTAR KAUR |
18-06-2020 |
Perused the Appeal, RTI application and replies given by CPIOs as attached, it is observed that the information sought by the Appellant is voluminous in nature and Appellant is requested note for future that as given in Section 3 of the RTI Rules, 2012 that RTI application shall ordinarily not contain more than five hundred words, excluding annexure, address of the Central Public Information Officer and that of the applicant. However, even in adverse conditions due to covid-19 pandemic and restricted manpower post lockdown, CPIOs have provided all the available information for Point No 1 to 21 as per provisions of the RTI Act, 2005.
It is noted that the following CPIOs have provided information sought for are given below:-
Sh. Vinod Babu for Point No. 1 to 10 and 16 on 12.06.2020
Sh. Jeevan Chandra for Point No. 11 & 12 on 09.06.2020
Sh. Krishan Avtar Talwar for Point No. 13 & 14 on 17.06.2020
Sh. A. K. Assija for Point No.15 &17 on 11.06.2020
Sh. K. L. Das for Point No. 18 on 09.06.2020
Sh. S. C. Sharma for Point No. 19 to 21 on 12.06.2020.
It is also seen that the said RTI application was received during the lockdown period and office was working with restricted number of employees, according to the guidelines issued by Govt. of India after partial lockdown/unlock-1. Sh. Jeevan Chandra, CPIO had received the said RTI on 29.05.2020, Sh. Vinod Babu, CPIO had received on 01.06.2020, Sh. A. K. Assija, CPIO had received on 08.06.2020, Sh. Krishan Avtar Talwar, Sh. K. L. Das and Sh. S. C. Sharma had received on 09.06.2020 as stated in their replies and all the above CPIOs have provided the information within timeline stated under the RTI Act, 2005.
It is noted that most of the information sought by the Appellant is available in the public domain. On perusal of contents of the appeal, it is further evident that most of the information sought by the Appellant was already available with him.
Further, the information given by Sh. K. L. Das for Point No. 18 is as per provision of RTI Act, 2005 & in accordance with the information sought by the Appellant through his RTI application. Communication from Appellant after receipt of letter dated 09.09.2019 in the Commission was not mentioned in Point No. 18 of his RTI application, and thus is an additional information sought and hence cannot be considered at First Appeal stage.
It has also been observed that Sh. A. K. Assija has sent the desired information for Point No. 15 on Appellant’s email id. However, the Appellant has stated that “No email along with the sought pieces of information, ever been received by me till dateâ€. Therefore, Sh. A. K. Assija, CPIO is hereby directed to resend the reply against point No. 15 of the RTI application within 10 days after receipt of the order.
The information given by above CPIOs is as per provision of RTI Act, 2005 on the information sought by the Appellant. No further intervention is required on the part of FAA in the matter. |
NA |
| 310 |
CICOM/A/E/20/00079 |
Ms. ROOP AVTAR KAUR |
17-06-2020 |
the first appeal for all points of RTI aaplication No. CICOM/R/E/20/312 has already been decided vide Online FAA order No. CICOM/A/E/20/00075 dated 17.06.2020 |
NA |