There are serious errors in your form submission, please see below for details.

Search RTI Appeal

List of RTI Appeal

SNo. Registration No Appellate Authority Name Received date Reply Appeal Reply Doc
41 CICOM/A/P/21/00012 Ms. ROOP AVTAR KAUR 25-01-2021 Please see the file. download pdf
42 CICOM/A/P/21/00013 Ms. ROOP AVTAR KAUR 25-01-2021 Please see the file. download pdf
43 CICOM/A/E/21/00008 Ms. ROOP AVTAR KAUR 24-01-2021 I. RTI APPLICATION The applicant has referred an email dt.16.11.2020 of Shri Ullas Jain addressed to Secretary-CIC and JS-CIC regarding grievance No. DOPTAT/ E/2019/04441 about monitoring of recovery of penalties imposed by CIC on default CPIOs. Out of the 9 RTI points answered, the Appellant submitted Appeal against the information furnished for point-1 which is reproduced below. 1. Copy of action taken by Secretary-CIC on the above email. II. RTI REPLY “It is intimated that letter No. CIC/PENALTY/2018/CR-II/66 dated 02.04.2018 was sent to Secretary-DOPAT by Secretary-CIC for ‘advice as how to deal with such non-recoveries as no powers of write off are available to the Commission under the Rules” and letter No.CIC/ PENALTY/2018/CR-II/66 dated 14.06.2018 was also sent to Secretary-DOPAT by Additional Secretary-CIC for “Monitoring of recovery of penalty imposed on the defaulting CPIO’s by the Central Information Commission thereof. No further information/record is available.” II. FIRST APPEAL The appellant has submitted Appeal dt.24.01.2021 against answer furnished for point-1 with a request to direct concerned CPIO to provide clear information. III. FAA DECISION As per Section 2(f) of RTI Act, 2005 only such information as is available and existing and held by the public authority or is under control of the public authority can be provided by a PIO. The PIO is not supposed to create or collect information that is not a part of the record. Hence, the reply sent by the CPIO, CIC is factual and as per the provisions of RTI Act, 2005 with reference to information provided by the office of Secretary-CIC. Shri Ram Kumar, CPIO is however directed to revisit his reply and provide clear answer to the appellant on Point-1. IV. The appeal is being disposed of accordingly. NA
44 CICOM/A/E/21/00009 Ms. ROOP AVTAR KAUR 24-01-2021 I. In his RTI application No.CIC/R/E/20/01043 dated 17.12.2020, the applicant has referred an email dt.16.11.2020 of Shri Ullas Jain addressed to Secretary-CIC and JS-CIC regarding grievance No.DOPTAT/E/2019/04441 about monitoring of recovery of penalties imposed by CIC on default CPIOs. Out of the 9 RTI points answered, the Appellant submitted Appeal against the information furnished for point-7. The information sought and its reply are reproduced below. RTI Point-7:- “Number of pages of authority letters submitted by representatives of respondent PIOs along with names of representatives prior to hearing of the following appeals – (a) CIC/DIRED/A/2017/163047 (b) CIC/DIRED/A/2017/183485 (c) CIC/DIRED/A/2017/165315 (d) CIC/GNCTD/C/2017/183486 (e) CIC/OTDCM/A/2017/160481 (f) CIC/DIRED/A/2017/176192 (g) CIC/DIRED/C/2018/183483 (h) CIC/DIRED/A/2018/101320 (i) CIC/DIRED/A/2017/178424 RTI Reply to Point-7:- “No authority letters available in the concerned files, however the name of the representative attended the hearing is as under:- For (a)(c)(f)&(i): Dr Veer Singh and Atul Jaiswal. For (b)(d)(g)&(h) : S/Shri Harkishan, Naren Gupta, HP Singh, Vinay Chaudhary, OP Anand, Subhash Aggarwal, heha Shanker, Deepak Rawat, Tapeshwar, Baldev Singh & Manoj Kumar. For (e) : Shri S.Sai and Subhash Aggarwal, S Sondhi and Pradeep.” II. GROUNDS FOR FIRST APPEAL:- The appellant vide Appeal dt.24.01.2021 has mentioned that the reply of the CPIO is incomplete, misleading and failed to mention whether the authority letters collected from the representatives of the PIO have gone missing or were not collected from the representatives at the time of hearing. III. FAA DECISION:- Shri Ram Prakash Grover, CPIO is directed to revisit his reply and furnish information as asked by the appellant. IV. The appeal is being disposed of accordingly. NA
45 CICOM/A/P/21/00011 Ms. ROOP AVTAR KAUR 20-01-2021 Please see the file. download pdf
46 CICOM/A/P/21/00009 MEENA BALIMANE SHARMA 19-01-2021 Please see the file. download pdf
47 CICOM/A/E/21/00007 Ms. ROOP AVTAR KAUR 18-01-2021 I. The appellant had requested the following information vide online RTI application No.CICOM/R/E/20/01066 dated 26.12.2020. 1. Provide certified copies of file noting, orders, minutes of meeting, Action taken Report, correspondences and communications made (till the date of reply of this RTI application) along with minutes of meetings held, relating to the implementation of direction of Hon’ble CIC in Subhash Chandra Aggarwal and Ors. vs. Indian National Congress/All India Congress Committee and Ors. (MANU/CI/0068/2013) dated 03.06.2013. 2. What are the Steps taken by CIC in Order to have a check whether its orders are being enforced or not 3. Are there any powers conferred to CIC to take any Action (as in present Case) where the Order is not enforced despite a long time gap of 7 Years. II. The CPIO Shri Ram Kumar has given the following reply on 12.01.2021. “.....the file number written by you in your RTI application is not found in the Commission’s website. Kindly provide actual file number so that sought for information can be given to you.” III. The appellant in his First Appeal dated 18.01.2021 has mentioned as under: “The information was rejected on the ground that file number written by me was not found. ......... File number for your convenience is provided as follows: File No.CIC/SM/C/2011/001386 and File No.CIC/SM/C/2011/000838. Please provide the information Point wise.” IV. Shri Ram Kumar, CPIO is directed to provide the required information within 15 days to the Appellate. V. The appeal is being disposed of accordingly. NA
48 CICOM/A/E/21/00006 Ms. ROOP AVTAR KAUR 17-01-2021 1. अपीलकर्ता द्वारा ऑनलाइन आर.टी.आई. आवेदन सं. CICOM/R/E/20/01047 के माध्येम से निम्न लिखित सूचना मांगी गई थी:- 1. पत्र संख्या CIC/penalty/2018/CR-2/00506/157 दिनांक 16.04.2018 पर हुई कार्रवाई की सूचना दें । 2. CPIO द्वारा पेनल्टीं नहीं चुकाने पर CIC द्वारा रिकवरी करने के लिए कार्रवाई करने की शक्तियों/नियमों/प्रावधानों की सूचना दें । 3. प्रथम अपीलीय अधिकारी का नाम, पता, लैंड लाइन तथा मोबाइल नंबर और इमेल आईडी दें। 2. उक्त आर.टी.आई. आवेदन के प्रतिउत्तर में श्री राम कुमार, केन्द्रीय जन सूचना अधिकारी, केन्द्रीय रजिस्ट्री -।। द्वारा बिन्दुवार निम्नलिखित सूचनाएं उपलब्ध करवाई गई:- 1. इस केस में आयोग द्वारा संबंधित विभाग को दो अनुस्माारक दिनांक 06.12.2018 एवं 11.01.2021 को जारी किए गए । 2. इस प्रकार की सूचना रिकार्ड में उपलब्ध नहीं है । 3. श्रीमती मीना बलिमने शर्मा, प्रथम अपीलीय अधिकारी, केन्द्रीय सूचना आयोग, बाबा गंगनाथ मार्ग, मुनिरका, नई दिल्ली – 110067 । 011-26162290, as-cic@nic.in 3. अपीलकर्ता ने आर.टी.आई. आवेदन के बिंदु सं. 1 एवं 2 के संदर्भ में प्रदान की गई सूचना से संतुष्‍ट नहीं होने पर प्रथम अपील दाखिल की है तथा अनुरोध किया है कि CPIO को सही सूचना देने के लिए आदेश दें । 4. आर.टी.आई. आवेदन, प्रदान की गई सूचना एवं प्रथम अपील आवेदन का अवलोकन करने पर पाया गया कि अपीलकर्ता द्वारा आर.टी.आई. आवेदन के बिंदु सं. 1 एवं 2 में जो सूचना मांगी गई थी, श्री राम कुमार, केन्द्रीय जन सूचना अधिकारी, केन्द्रीय रजिस्ट्री -।। द्वारा प्रदान कर दी गई है तथा बिंदु सं. 3 के तहत प्रदान की गई सूचना के संदर्भ में केन्द्रीय जन सूचना अधिकारी ने अपनी लिखित टिपपणी में उल्लेरख किया है कि ‘प्रदान की गई सूचना में ईमेल आई.डी. as-cic@nic.in भूलवश टंकित हो गया है । प्रथम अपील आवेदन सूचना का अधिकार अधिनियम, 2005 की धारा 19 (1) के प्रावधानों के तहत पत्राचार द्वारा अथवा ऑनलाइन माध्यूम से ही किया जाना अपेक्षित है’। केन्द्रीय जन सूचना अधिकारी द्वारा प्रदान की गई सूचना, सूचना का अधिकार अधिनियम, 2005 के प्रावधानों के अनुसार ही है, अत: इसमें प्रथम अपीलीय अधिकारी के हस्तक्षेप की कोई आवश्यवकता नहीं है । NA
49 CICOM/A/E/21/00005 Ms. ROOP AVTAR KAUR 15-01-2021 I. The appellant had requested the following information vide online RTI application dated 31.12.2020. Copy of affidavit or explanation or written submission received from CPIO, New India Assurance Company Ltd., RTI Cell, Mumbai-400001 relating to Commission’s decision in F.No. CIC/NIACL/A/2019/639064. II. The CPIO Shri SC Sharma has given the following reply on 14.01.2021. “Point-1: Written submission dated 23.12.2020 received from CPIO in respect of case no. CIC/NIACL/A/2019/639064, copy of which was also marked to you by CPIO, is however, enclosed.” III. The appellant in his First Appeal dated 15.01.2021 has mentioned that he has not received the attachment of written submission dated 23.12.2020. IV. Shri SC Sharma, CPIO is directed to provide the written submission dated 23.12.2020 immediately to the Appellate. He is advised to be careful in sending attachments, in future. V. The appeal is being disposed of accordingly. NA
50 CICOM/A/E/21/00004 Ms. ROOP AVTAR KAUR 13-01-2021 I. The appellant had requested the following clarification vide online RTI application dated 12.01.2021. “What parameters are considered for issuing OBC non-creamy layer certificate. As our parent is a Group-C worker in state government in Karnataka and income exceeds 8 lakh rupees. Am I eligible to get OBC non-creamy layer certificate as my caste falls under OBC list released by central government.” II. The CPIO Shri Ram Kumar has given the following reply on 12.01.2021. “Central Information Commission does not have the information. You may approach the concerned Public Authority. Central Information Commission is the second appellate authority for the RTIs filed with Ministries/Departments under Central Government and UTs of India and has no jurisdiction over any matters related to State Government.” III. The appellant in his First Appeal dated 13.01.2021 has reiterated his request for the said clarification. IV. On perusal of the First Appeal petition, RTI application and reply given by the CPIO, it is observed that Shri Ram Kumar, CPIO, CIC has already provided the requisite information as per the provisions of the RTI Act, 2005. Hence, no intervention is required on behalf of the FAA in this matter. V. The appeal is being disposed of accordingly. NA