There are serious errors in your form submission, please see below for details.

Search RTI Appeal

List of RTI Appeal

SNo. Registration No Appellate Authority Name Received date Reply Appeal Reply Doc
641 CICOM/A/2019/60117 AJITKUMAR VASANTRAO SONTAKKE 25-07-2019 On perusal of the case, it is observed that appellant has sought same information in three separate online RTI applications registered vide Nos.CICOM/R/2019/505036, 50538 dt.23.06.2019 & 50546 dt.24.06.2019 and one offline RTI application dated 24.06.2019 registered vide No.CICOM/R/2019/00510. In the appeal, appellant has stated that no information received by him till date. Further, on perusal of the concerned case files of RTI Cell, it is observed that in response to offline RTI application registered vide No.CICOM/R/2019/00510, Shri Rajesh Mongia, CPIO (CR II) has already furnished information on Points 10 to 14 vide letter dated 15.07.2019 and Shri R.P. Grover, CPIO cum DO to IC(YS) has furnished information on Points 1 to 9 vide letter dated 26.07.2019. In his reply, Shri Grover has also mentioned the reasons of delay in furnishing information. However, a copy of reply of Shri R.P. Grover is attached herewith. It is further to mention that point-wise information furnished by both CPIOs seems to be appropriate, therefore, no further intervention is required on the part of the FAA, in the matter. download pdf
642 CICOM/A/2019/60115 AJITKUMAR VASANTRAO SONTAKKE 25-07-2019 On perusal of the case, it is observed that appellant has sought same information in three separate online RTI applications registered vide Nos.CICOM/R/2019/505036, 50538 dt.23.06.2019 & 50546 dt.24.06.2019 and one offline RTI application dated 24.06.2019 registered vide No.CICOM/R/2019/00510. In the appeal, appellant has stated that no information received by him till date. Further, on perusal of the concerned case files of RTI Cell, it is observed that in response to offline RTI application registered vide No.CICOM/R/2019/00510, Shri Rajesh Mongia, CPIO (CR II) has already furnished information on Points 10 to 14 vide letter dated 15.07.2019 and Shri R.P. Grover, CPIO cum DO to IC(YS) has furnished information on Points 1 to 9 vide letter dated 26.07.2019. In his reply, Shri Grover has also mentioned the reasons of delay in furnishing information. However, a copy of reply of both CPIOs’ is attached herewith. It is further to mention that point-wise information furnished by both CPIOs seems to be appropriate, therefore, no further intervention is required on the part of the FAA, in the matter. download pdf
643 CICOM/A/2019/60116 AJITKUMAR VASANTRAO SONTAKKE 25-07-2019 On perusal of the case, it is observed that appellant has sought same information in three separate online RTI applications registered vide Nos.CICOM/R/2019/505036, 50538 dt.23.06.2019 & 50546 dt.24.06.2019 and one offline RTI application dated 24.06.2019 registered vide No.CICOM/R/2019/00510. In the appeal, appellant has stated that no information received by him till date. Further, on perusal of the concerned case files of RTI Cell, it is observed that in response to offline RTI application registered vide No.CICOM/R/2019/00510, Shri Rajesh Mongia, CPIO (CR II) has already furnished information on Points 10 to 14 vide letter dated 15.07.2019 and Shri R.P. Grover, CPIO cum DO to IC(YS) has furnished information on Points 1 to 9 vide letter dated 26.07.2019. In his reply, Shri Grover has also mentioned the reasons of delay in furnishing information. However, a copy of reply of Shri R.P. Grover is attached herewith. It is further to mention that point-wise information furnished by both CPIOs seems to be appropriate, therefore, no further intervention is required on the part of the FAA, in the matter. download pdf
644 CICOM/A/2019/60119 AJITKUMAR VASANTRAO SONTAKKE 25-07-2019 On perusal of the RTI application, CPIO’s reply and submissions made in the appeal, it is observed that point-wise information as available with the CPIO has been furnished to the appellant, therefore, no further intervention is required on the part of the FAA, in the matter. NA
645 CICOM/A/2019/60121 AJITKUMAR VASANTRAO SONTAKKE 25-07-2019 On perusal of the RTI application, CPIO’s reply and submissions made in the appeal, it is observed that reply furnished by the CPIO is appropriate and factual, therefore, no intervention is required on the part of the FAA, in the matter. NA
646 CICOM/A/2019/60118 AJITKUMAR VASANTRAO SONTAKKE 25-07-2019 On perusal of the RTI application, CPIO’s reply and appeal, it is observed that as far as point-wise information furnished by the CPIO is concerned, there is no infirmity in the CPIO’s reply. The appellant in her appeal has requested to devise certain procedure. In this regard, appellant is advised to send her request/suggestions separately to the Commission. NA
647 CICOM/A/2019/60114 AJITKUMAR VASANTRAO SONTAKKE 24-07-2019 On perusal of the RTI application, CPIO’s reply and submissions made in the appeal, it is observed that the reply furnished by the CPIO is appropriate, therefore, no intervention is required on the part of the FAA, in the matter. NA
648 CICOM/A/2019/00132 AJITKUMAR VASANTRAO SONTAKKE 23-07-2019 please see the file download pdf
649 CICOM/A/2019/00135 AJITKUMAR VASANTRAO SONTAKKE 23-07-2019 please see the file download pdf
650 CICOM/A/2019/00133 AJITKUMAR VASANTRAO SONTAKKE 23-07-2019 please see the file download pdf