| SNo. |
Registration No |
Appellate Authority Name |
Received date |
Reply Appeal |
Reply Doc |
| 2761 |
CICOM/A/2019/60202 |
Ms. ROOP AVTAR KAUR |
20-10-2019 |
The RTI application and reply of the CPIO, RTI Cell, have been perused . CPIO has given a general reply. As requested by the applicant point – wise reply may be given to the applicant by the CPIO. |
NA |
| 2762 |
CICOM/A/2019/60201 |
Ms. ROOP AVTAR KAUR |
19-10-2019 |
please see the file |
 |
| 2763 |
CICOM/A/2019/60200 |
Ms. ROOP AVTAR KAUR |
18-10-2019 |
I have pursued RTI application and reply of the CPIO. It is seen that CPIO has not given specific reply to the queries of the RTI.
Therefore, CPIO RTI Cell, is directed to give the specific reply against the point no 1 & 2 of the RTI application. |
NA |
| 2764 |
CICOM/A/2019/60199 |
Ms. ROOP AVTAR KAUR |
15-10-2019 |
The RTI application and the reply of the CPIO, RTI Cell have been perused.The CPIO has not given specific reply to the applicant. CPIO is directed to give specific reply within 15 days. |
NA |
| 2765 |
CICOM/A/2019/60197 |
AJITKUMAR VASANTRAO SONTAKKE |
11-10-2019 |
I have gone through the RTI application and reply given by the CPIO. It is seen that CPIO, RTI Cell has not given specific reply to the question of RTI.
CPIO RTI Cell is directed to give the specific reply to the applicant with in 10 days. |
NA |
| 2766 |
CICOM/A/2019/60198 |
AJITKUMAR VASANTRAO SONTAKKE |
11-10-2019 |
I have gone through the reply of Sh S C Sharma, CPIO. On Scrutiny it is observed that the CPIO has given information based on the information as available on the file.Therefore, I am in agreement with the reply of the CPIO.No further intervention is required. |
NA |
| 2767 |
CICOM/A/2019/60195 |
AJITKUMAR VASANTRAO SONTAKKE |
10-10-2019 |
For disposal of the appeal, personal hearing was organized on 10th December, 2019. During the hearing process Rajappa, Sh. K. L. Das, Sh. H. P. Sen & Sh. S. C. Sharma, CPIOs were physically present and appellant was present through audio-conferencing.
Decision with reason:-
On perusal of the replies of CPIOs and documents shown during hearing, it is found that appropriate reply has been provided based on the available records. Therefore, no intervention is required on the part of the FAA in the matter and appeal is being dispose of accordingly. |
NA |
| 2768 |
CICOM/A/2019/60196 |
AJITKUMAR VASANTRAO SONTAKKE |
10-10-2019 |
I have gone through reply of Sh S S Rohilla, CPIO. The applicant has asked reasons for not taking any action against CPIO/MEA, for disobeying the Commission order which, does not come under the definition of information under section 2 (f) of RTI Act- 2005. Therefore, I am agreement with the reply of the CPIO. No further intervention is required. |
NA |
| 2769 |
CICOM/A/2019/60194 |
Ms. ROOP AVTAR KAUR |
10-10-2019 |
For disposal of the appeal, personal hearing was organized on 10th December, 2019. During the hearing process Sh. K. L. Das, Sh. H. P. Sen, Sh. S. C. Sharma, Sh. A. K. Assija & Sh. K. A. Talwar, CPIOs were physically present and appellant was present through audio-conferencing.
Decision with reason:-
On perusal of the replies of CPIOs and documents shown during hearing, it is found that appropriate reply has been provided based on the available records. Therefore, no intervention is required on the part of the FAA in the matter and appeal is being dispose of accordingly. |
NA |
| 2770 |
CICOM/A/2019/60191 |
Yogesh Kumar Singhal |
07-10-2019 |
Appellant was heard over phone. Appellant was heard over phone. Sh. H. P. Sen, Sh. K. L. Das, Sh. S. C. Sharma, Sh. S. S. Rohilla, Sh. A. K. Assija, Sh, S. R. Murthy and Sh. Jeevan Chandra, CPIOs were present.
On perusal of the RTI application, CPIOs |
NA |