SNo. |
Registration No |
Appellate Authority Name |
Received date |
Reply Appeal |
Reply Doc |
3581 |
CICOM/A/2018/60005 |
R K SINGH |
10-01-2018 |
On perusal of the RTI application, reply of the CPIO and appeal, it is observed that the information furnished by the CPIO is appropriate. However, the appellant may visit http://cic.gov.in/sites/default/files/RTI/RTIRules2012.pdf to see Rule 4 of RTI Rul |
NA |
3582 |
CICOM/A/2018/60006 |
R K SINGH |
10-01-2018 |
In the RTI application, appellant has sought information in c/w case F.No.CIC/BS/A/2015/002183 that “How Mr Tarachand attended the proceedings on 17.10.2017 whether personally, telephonically or through video conferencing.
Shri Dinesh Kumar, CPIO cum D |
NA |
3583 |
CICOM/A/2018/60004 |
R K SINGH |
07-01-2018 |
As per appeal, the appellant is aggrieved only with the reply of Shri Jeewan Chandra, CPIO(MR) on Points 3, 4 & 6 of the RTI application. On point 3 of the RTI application, appellant has sought certified copies of reports for the year 2015, 2016 & 2017 un |
NA |
3584 |
CICOM/A/2018/00017 |
R K SINGH |
05-01-2018 |
please see the file |
|
3585 |
CICOM/A/2018/00010 |
R K SINGH |
05-01-2018 |
please see the file |
|
3586 |
CICOM/A/2018/00012 |
R K SINGH |
05-01-2018 |
please see the file |
|
3587 |
CICOM/A/2018/00009 |
R K SINGH |
05-01-2018 |
please see the file |
|
3588 |
CICOM/A/2018/00011 |
R K SINGH |
05-01-2018 |
please see the file |
|
3589 |
CICOM/A/2018/60003 |
R K SINGH |
05-01-2018 |
In the appeal, the appellant has stated that his Point-(i) was not clear to CPIO, therefore, he gave a snap of dak received page where the name of the Public Authority is not mentioned and wants to know the reasons for not inclusion of name of the Public |
NA |
3590 |
CICOM/A/2018/00015 |
R K SINGH |
05-01-2018 |
please see the file |
|