There are serious errors in your form submission, please see below for details.

Search RTI Appeal

List of RTI Appeal

SNo. Registration No Appellate Authority Name Received date Reply Appeal Reply Doc
681 CICOM/A/E/24/00084 Brig. VIPIN CHAKRAWARTI 19-03-2024 I.GROUNDS FOR FIRST APPEAL:- No Reply given by the CPIO (DR to IC-VT) till date. II. DECISION OF THE FIRST APPELLATE AUTHORITY: Online First Appeal and the RTI application have been perused. CPIO (DR to IC – VT) is directed to reply the RTI application as per the provisions of the RTI Act, 2005 by 18.04.2024, free of cost. III. The appeal is disposed of accordingly. NA
682 CICOM/A/E/24/00083 Brig. VIPIN CHAKRAWARTI 17-03-2024 I.GROUNDS FOR FIRST APPEAL: No Reply given by the CPIO (DR to IC-VT) till date. II. DECISION OF THE FIRST APPELLATE AUTHORITY: Online First Appeal and the RTI application have been perused. CPIO (DR to IC – VT) is directed to reply the RTI application as per the provisions of the RTI Act, 2005 by 18.04.2024, free of cost. III. The appeal is disposed of accordingly. NA
683 CICOM/A/E/24/00082 Brig. VIPIN CHAKRAWARTI 16-03-2024 The First Appeal, RTI application and reply given by CPIO is CIC have been perused. As per section 8(1) (j) information which relates to personal information the disclosure of which has no relationship to any public activity of interest, or which would cause unwarranted invasion of the privacy of the individual may be exempted from disclosure unless the Central Public Information Officer of the State Public Information Officer or the appellate authority, as the case may be, is satisfied that the larger public interest justifies the disclosure of such information. Accordingly, the reply given by the CPIO is appropriate and as per the provisions of the RTI Act, 2005. Hence, no intervention is required on behalf of the FAA in this matter. The appeal is disposed of accordingly. NA
684 CICOM/A/P/24/00033 Ms. ROOP AVTAR KAUR 14-03-2024 Ref RTI No.- CICOM/R/P/24/00050 GROUNDS FOR FIRST APPEAL: The Appellant submitted first appeal being unsatisfied with the reply of the CPIO and stated that CPIO provided incomplete information. DECISION OF FIRST APPELLATE AUTHORITY: The First Appeal, RTI application and reply given by CPIO of CIC have been perused. In the instant case, point (iv) was wrongly transferred to CPIO(Legal Cell) whereas only point (iii) of the RTI application pertains to CPIO(Legal Cell). Accordingly, CPIO(Legal Cell) is directed to revisit the RTI application as per the provisions of the RTI Act, 2005 and reply to the Point (iii) by 15.04.2024. The appeal is disposed of accordingly. NA
685 CICOM/A/P/24/00034 Brig. VIPIN CHAKRAWARTI 14-03-2024 Please see the file. download pdf
686 CICOM/A/P/24/00035 Brig. VIPIN CHAKRAWARTI 14-03-2024 Please see the file. download pdf
687 CICOM/A/E/24/00081 Ms. ROOP AVTAR KAUR 14-03-2024 Ref RTI No. - CICOM/R/E/24/00212 GROUNDS FOR FIRST APPEAL: The Appellant submitted first appeal stating that "The information is incomplete so I request for First Appeal. In point 10, Provide the rules that How a citizen can understand there number in the queue of First Come And First Get, How can one get the number of RTI disposed before them and get how much time they have to control to get Information." DECISION OF FIRST APPELLATE AUTHORITY: The First Appeal, RTI application and reply given by CPIO of CIC have been perused. As per Section 2(f) of the RTI Act, 2005 only such information as is available and existing and held by the public authority or is under control of the public authority can be provided by a PIO. The PIO is not supposed to create or collate information that is not a part of the record. Accordingly, the reply given by the CPIO is appropriate and as per the provisions of the RTI Act,2005. Hence, no intervention is required on behalf of the FAA in this matter. The appeal is disposed of accordingly. NA
688 CICOM/A/E/24/00079 Ms. ROOP AVTAR KAUR 13-03-2024 Ref RTI No. - CICOM/R/E/24/00138 GROUNDS FOR FIRST APPEAL: The Appellant submitted first appeal stating that CPIO provided incomplete,misleading or false information. DECISION OF FIRST APPELLATE AUTHORITY: The First Appeal, RTI application and reply given by CPIO of CIC have been perused. As per Section 2(f) of the RTI Act, 2005 only such information as is available and existing and held by the public authority or is under control of the public authority can be provided by a PIO. The PIO is not supposed to create or collate information that is not a part of the record. Accordingly, the reply given by the CPIO is appropriate and as per the provisions of the RTI Act,2005. Hence, no intervention is required on behalf of the FAA in this matter. The appeal is disposed of accordingly. NA
689 CICOM/A/E/24/00080 Ms. ROOP AVTAR KAUR 13-03-2024 Ref RTI No. - CICOM/R/E/24/00033 GROUNDS FOR FIRST APPEAL: The Appellant submitted first appeal stating that CPIO provided incomplete,misleading or false information. DECISION OF FIRST APPELLATE AUTHORITY: The First Appeal, RTI application and reply given by CPIO of CIC have been perused. The reply given by the CPIO is appropriate and as per the provisions of the RTI Act,2005. Hence, no intervention is required on behalf of the FAA in this matter. The appeal is disposed of accordingly. NA
690 CICOM/A/E/24/00074 Brig. VIPIN CHAKRAWARTI 12-03-2024 On perusal of the Appeal, RTI application and reply of the CPIO, it is observed that no information given by the CPIO for points no. 1 & 2 of the RTI application No CICOM/R/E/24/00203. Accordingly, CPIO (DR to IC – VT) is directed to reply the RTI application as per the provisions of the RTI Act, 2005 by 18.04.2024, free of cost. The appeal is disposed of accordingly. NA