| SNo. |
Registration No |
Appellate Authority Name |
Received date |
Reply Appeal |
Reply Doc |
| 81 |
CICOM/A/E/25/00101 |
Brig. VIPIN CHAKRAWARTI |
08-05-2025 |
On perusal of the Online Appeal, RTI application and reply of the CPIO, it is observed that the information given by the CPIO for the RTI application No CICOM/R/E/25/00329 is not as per the provision or RTI Act, 2005. Accordingly, direction is being given to CPIO, (Dak Section) to revisit the matter and provide complete appropriate information within 10 days of receipt of this order. |
NA |
| 82 |
CICOM/A/E/25/00098 |
Brig. VIPIN CHAKRAWARTI |
08-05-2025 |
On perusal of the Online Appeal, RTI application and reply of the CPIO, it is observed that the information given by the CPIO for the RTI application No CICOM/R/E/25/00331 is not as per the provision or RTI Act, 2005. Accordingly, direction is being given to CPIO, (Dak Section) to revisit the matter and provide complete appropriate information within 10 days of receipt of this order. |
NA |
| 83 |
CICOM/A/P/25/00099 |
Mr. Brajesh Kumar Pandey |
07-05-2025 |
FAA order is attached. |
 |
| 84 |
CICOM/A/P/25/00103 |
Brig. VIPIN CHAKRAWARTI |
07-05-2025 |
Please see the file. |
|
| 85 |
CICOM/A/E/25/00096 |
Brig. VIPIN CHAKRAWARTI |
07-05-2025 |
The online First Appeal, RTI application and reply given by CPIO of CIC have been perused. Accordingly, the reply given by the CPIO is appropriate and as per provisions of the RTI Act, 2005. Hence, no intervention is required on behalf of the FAA in this matter. |
NA |
| 86 |
CICOM/A/E/25/00097 |
Brig. VIPIN CHAKRAWARTI |
07-05-2025 |
The First Appeal, RTI application and reply given by CPIO of CIC have been perused. As per Section 2 (f) of the RTI Act, 2005 only such information as is available and existing and held by the public authority or is under control of the public authority can be provided by a PIO. The PIO is not supposed to create or collate information that is not a part of the record. Accordingly, the reply given by the CPIO is appropriate and as per provisions of the RTI Act, 2005. Hence, no intervention is required on behalf of the FAA in this matter. |
NA |
| 87 |
CICOM/A/E/25/00095 |
Brig. VIPIN CHAKRAWARTI |
06-05-2025 |
The online First Appeal, RTI application and reply given by CPIO of CIC have been perused. Accordingly, the reply given by the CPIO is appropriate and as per provisions of the RTI Act, 2005. Hence, no intervention is required on behalf of the FAA in this matter. |
NA |
| 88 |
CICOM/A/P/25/00098 |
Brig. VIPIN CHAKRAWARTI |
02-05-2025 |
PFA |
|
| 89 |
CICOM/A/E/25/00093 |
Brig. VIPIN CHAKRAWARTI |
01-05-2025 |
The First Appeal, RTI application and reply given by CPIO of CIC have been perused. As per Section 2 (f) of the RTI Act, 2005 only such information as is available and existing and held by the public authority or is under control of the public authority can be provided by a PIO. The PIO is not supposed to create or collate information that is not a part of the record. Accordingly, the reply given by the CPIO is appropriate and as per provisions of the RTI Act, 2005. Hence, no intervention is required on behalf of the FAA in this matter. |
NA |
| 90 |
CICOM/A/P/25/00096 |
Brig. VIPIN CHAKRAWARTI |
01-05-2025 |
Please see the file. |
|