There are serious errors in your form submission, please see below for details.

Search RTI Appeal

List of RTI Appeal

SNo. Registration No Appellate Authority Name Received date Reply Appeal Reply Doc
881 CICOM/A/2019/60007 AJITKUMAR VASANTRAO SONTAKKE 10-01-2019 The appellant has been contacted over his given mobile number who informed that CPIO has provided incomplete information. CPIO had informed him that hearing in case file No.CIC/PGIME/C/2017/121556 was started at 1 pm on 26.06.2018 though the hearing was preponed. Hence, CPIO may be directed to provide factual information about exact time of hearing schedule. Further, appellant requested to provide recording of the said VC. Direction is accordingly given to Shri R.P. Grover, CPIO to provide factual information about starting time of the hearing and recording of the VC, if available to the appellant within 1 week from the date of receipt of the order. NA
882 CICOM/A/2019/00007 AJITKUMAR VASANTRAO SONTAKKE 08-01-2019 please see the file download pdf
883 CICOM/A/2019/00005 AJITKUMAR VASANTRAO SONTAKKE 07-01-2019 please see the file download pdf
884 CICOM/A/2019/00002 AJITKUMAR VASANTRAO SONTAKKE 07-01-2019 please see the file download pdf
885 CICOM/A/2019/00004 AJITKUMAR VASANTRAO SONTAKKE 07-01-2019 please see the file download pdf
886 CICOM/A/2019/00006 AJITKUMAR VASANTRAO SONTAKKE 07-01-2019 please see the file download pdf
887 CICOM/A/2019/60006 AJITKUMAR VASANTRAO SONTAKKE 07-01-2019 please see the file download pdf
888 CICOM/A/2019/00003 AJITKUMAR VASANTRAO SONTAKKE 07-01-2019 please see the file download pdf
889 CICOM/A/2019/00001 AJITKUMAR VASANTRAO SONTAKKE 07-01-2019 please see the file download pdf
890 CICOM/A/2019/60004 AJITKUMAR VASANTRAO SONTAKKE 06-01-2019 In the appeal, appellant has stated that CPIO has provided incomplete, misleading or false information and on the request column of the appeal, appellant has requested to provide soft/scan complete file copy of inspected two files CIC/DDA/TY/A/2017/191263 and CIC/DDA/TY/A/2017/116514. On perusal of the RTI application and CPIO’s reply, it is observed that CPIO has provided point-wise information to the appellant. CPIO has also offered inspection of above mention two case files to the appellant. Hence, there is no infirmity in the reply of the CPIO. Appellant is advised to avail opportunity of inspection offered by CPIO and CPIO is directed to provide copy of document identify by the appellant during the inspection, as per the provision of RTI Act. NA