| SNo. |
Registration No |
Appellate Authority Name |
Received date |
Reply Appeal |
Reply Doc |
| 821 |
CICOM/A/2019/00045 |
AJITKUMAR VASANTRAO SONTAKKE |
20-02-2019 |
please see the file |
|
| 822 |
CICOM/A/2019/00047 |
AJITKUMAR VASANTRAO SONTAKKE |
20-02-2019 |
please see the file |
|
| 823 |
CICOM/A/2019/60029 |
AJITKUMAR VASANTRAO SONTAKKE |
19-02-2019 |
On perusal of the RTI application, CPIO’s reply and appeal, it is observed that the appellant has not sought any information but sought comments of CPIO on the decision of the Commission. In this regard, appellant may refer to Para-6 of Hon’ble High Court of Delhi order dated 11.01.2013 in LPA No.785/2012 Hansi Rawat and Anr. Vs. Punjab National Bank and Ors, in which it was held that:-
“6. The proceedings under the RTI Act do not entail detailed adjudication of the said aspects….. the proceedings under the RTI Act cannot be converted into proceedings for adjudication of disputes as to the correctness of the information furnished.â€
Hence, reply of the CPIO is appropriate. Further to it, CPIO as well as FAA of the Commission has no authority to comment on the decision of the Commission. |
NA |
| 824 |
CICOM/A/2019/00042 |
AJITKUMAR VASANTRAO SONTAKKE |
18-02-2019 |
please see the file |
|
| 825 |
CICOM/A/2019/60027 |
AJITKUMAR VASANTRAO SONTAKKE |
18-02-2019 |
please see the file |
|
| 826 |
CICOM/A/2019/60028 |
AJITKUMAR VASANTRAO SONTAKKE |
18-02-2019 |
please see the file |
|
| 827 |
CICOM/A/2019/00043 |
AJITKUMAR VASANTRAO SONTAKKE |
18-02-2019 |
please see the file |
|
| 828 |
CICOM/A/2019/00038 |
AJITKUMAR VASANTRAO SONTAKKE |
15-02-2019 |
please see the file |
|
| 829 |
CICOM/A/2019/00039 |
AJITKUMAR VASANTRAO SONTAKKE |
15-02-2019 |
please see the file |
|
| 830 |
CICOM/A/2019/00040 |
AJITKUMAR VASANTRAO SONTAKKE |
15-02-2019 |
please see the file |
|