There are serious errors in your form submission, please see below for details.

Search RTI Appeal

List of RTI Appeal

SNo. Registration No Appellate Authority Name Received date Reply Appeal Reply Doc
1201 CICOM/A/P/23/00078 Ms. ROOP AVTAR KAUR 11-05-2023 Ref RTI No.- CICOM/R/P/23/00118 GROUNDS FOR FIRST APPEAL: The Appellant submitted first appeal stating that “Even after 2 months and 17 days I have not been furnished with the information- sought for. This is with reference to my appeal dt 4-10-2021, curative petition 18.9.2021 and review petition dt 4-10-2021, respectively. I should have furnished with the information sought within 30 days from the date of receipt of the RTI application, as per section 7(1) of the RTI Act 2005.” DECISION OF FIRST APPELLATE AUTHORITY: The First Appeal, RTI application and reply given by CPIO of CIC have been perused. As per Section 2(f) of the RTI Act, 2005 only such information as is available and existing and held by the public authority or is under control of the public authority can be provided by a PIO. The PIO is not supposed to create or collate information that is not a part of the record. In the instant case, the CPIO furnished reply to the RTI application on 27.03.2023, but as mentioned by the appellant in the first appeal of non-receipt of the reply, a copy of the RTI reply is being attached with this order. Accordingly, the reply given by the CPIO is appropriate and as per the provisions of the RTI Act, 2005. Hence, no intervention is required on behalf of the FAA in this matter. The appeal is disposed of accordingly. NA
1202 CICOM/A/E/23/00149 Ms. ROOP AVTAR KAUR 10-05-2023 Ref RTI No.- CICOM/R/E/23/00362 GROUNDS FOR FIRST APPEAL: The Appellant submitted first appeal stating that no response within the time limit. DECISION OF THE FIRST APPELLATE AUTHORITY: The First Appeal and the RTI application have been perused. CPIO (DR to IC-UM) is directed to reply to the RTI application as per the provisions of the RTI Act, 2005 by 31.05.2023, free of cost. The appeal is disposed of accordingly. NA
1203 CICOM/A/E/23/00148 Ms. ROOP AVTAR KAUR 09-05-2023 ऑनलाइन आर.टी.आई. आवेदन, प्रदान की गई सूचना एवं प्रथम अपील का अवलोकन करने पर पाया गया कि अपीलकर्ता के आर.टी.आई. आवेदन सं. CICOM/R/E/23/00420 में सूचना मांगी थी जिसके प्रतिउत्तर में केंद्रीय जन सूचना अधिकारी द्वारा प्रेषित की गई सूचना, सूचना का अधिकार अधिनियम के प्रावधानों एवं मांगी गई सूचना के अनुसार ही है। परंतु अपीलकर्ता ने अपनी प्रथम अपील में लिखा है की मुझे 1 बिंदुओं का ही जवाब दिया गया है 6 बिंदु का जवाब नहीं दिया गया जबकि केंद्रीय जन सूचना अधिकारी (DR to IC HS) ने पत्र दिनांक 02.05.2023 में जवाब भेज दिया है। अतः केंद्रीय जन सूचना अधिकारी द्वारा प्रदान की गई सूचना तथ्यात्मक है और इसमें प्रथम अपीलीय अधिकारी के हस्तक्षेप की कोई आवश्यकता नहीं है। NA
1204 CICOM/A/P/23/00077 Ms. ROOP AVTAR KAUR 09-05-2023 आर. टी. आई. आवेदन, प्रदान की गई सूचना एवं प्रथम अपील का अवलोकन करने पर पाया गया कि अपीलकर्ता के आर.टी.आई. आवेदन सं. CICOM/R/P/2023/00171 में सूचना मांगी थी जिसके प्रतिउत्तर में केंद्रीय जन सूचना अधिकारी द्वारा प्रेषित की गई सूचना, सूचना का अधिकार अधिनियम के प्रावधानों एवं मांगी गई सूचना के अनुसार ही है। अतः सूचना के अधिकार अधिनियम की धारा 2 (च) के प्रावधानों के अनुसार एक जन सूचना अधिकारी केवल सम्बंधित लोक प्राधिकरण के रिकॉर्ड में एक सामग्री के रूप में उपलब्ध सूचना ही प्रदान कर सकता है। अतः केंद्रीय जन सूचना अधिकारी द्वारा प्रदान की गई सूचना तथ्यात्मक है और इसमें प्रथम अपीलीय अधिकारी के हस्तक्षेप की कोई आवश्यकता नहीं है। NA
1205 CICOM/A/P/23/00075 Ms. ROOP AVTAR KAUR 09-05-2023 आर. टी. आई. आवेदन, प्रदान की गई सूचना एवं प्रथम अपील का अवलोकन करने पर पाया गया कि अपीलकर्ता के आर.टी.आई. आवेदन सं. CICOM/R/P/23/00199 में सूचना मांगी थी जिसके प्रतिउत्तर में केंद्रीय जन सूचना अधिकारी द्वारा प्रेषित की गई सूचना, सूचना का अधिकार अधिनियम के प्रावधानों एवं मांगी गई सूचना के अनुसार ही है। चूँकि आपने अपनी आर.टी.आई में कोई सूचना नहीं मांगी है बल्कि दक्षिण पूर्व मध्य रेलवे का निरिक्षण कराना सुनिचित कराने को कहा है। अतः सूचना के अधिकार अधिनियम की धारा 2 (च) के प्रावधानों के अनुसार एक जन सूचना अधिकारी केवल सम्बंधित लोक प्राधिकरण के रिकॉर्ड में एक सामग्री के रूप में उपलब्ध सूचना ही प्रदान कर सकता है। केंद्रीय जन सूचना अधिकारी द्वारा प्रदान की गई सूचना तथ्यात्मक है और इसमें प्रथम अपीलीय अधिकारी के हस्तक्षेप की कोई आवश्यकता नहीं है। NA
1206 CICOM/A/P/23/00076 Ms. ROOP AVTAR KAUR 09-05-2023 Ref RTI No.- CICOM/R/P/23/00226 DECISION OF FIRST APPELLATE AUTHORITY: The First Appeal, RTI application and reply given by CPIO of CIC have been perused. As per Section 2(f) of the RTI Act, 2005 only such information as is available and existing and held by the public authority or is under control of the public authority can be provided by a PIO. The PIO is not supposed to create or collate information that is not a part of the record. In the instant case, the grounds of appeal mentioned by the appellant in the first appeal does not pertain to the subject RTI and Central Information Commission. Accordingly, the reply given by the CPIO is appropriate and as per the provisions of the RTI Act, 2005. Hence, no intervention is required on behalf of the FAA in this matter. The appeal is disposed of accordingly. NA
1207 CICOM/A/E/23/00147 Ms. ROOP AVTAR KAUR 08-05-2023 Ref RTI No.- CICOM/R/E/23/00428 GROUNDS FOR FIRST APPEAL: The Appellant submitted first appeal stating that: “Dear Sir/Madam, I am writing in response to the reply I received from the Central Information Commission (CIC) regarding my RTI application. As per the response, the desired information is not available in CIC and my matter is related to the department of State Government. I was also informed that the department of State Government does not fall under the jurisdiction of the Central Information Commission. I appreciate the prompt response from CIC and would like to request your assistance in forwarding my RTI application to the relevant department of State Government, as per Section 6(3) of the RTI Act. I understand that it is the duty of the public authority to forward such applications to the relevant department or public authority within five days of receipt of the application, if they believe that the information requested is more closely related to that department or public authority. Therefore, I kindly request that my RTI application be transferred to the relevant department of State Government as soon as possible, in accordance with the provisions of the RTI Act. I also request that you provide me with written confirmation of the transfer, including the name and contact information of the department to which my application has been forwarded. I thank you in advance for your assistance and cooperation in this matter.” DECISION OF THE FIRST APPELLATE AUTHORITY: The First Appeal, RTI application and reply given by CPIO of CIC have been perused. As per Section 2(f) of the RTI Act, 2005 only such information as is available and existing and held by the public authority or is under control of the public authority can be provided by a PIO. The PIO is not supposed to create or collate information that is not a part of the record. State Information Commissions’ do not come under the purview/ambit of Central Information Commission, you are advised to approach the concerned public authority. Accordingly, the reply given by the CPIO is appropriate and as per the provisions of the RTI Act, 2005. Hence, no intervention is required on behalf of the FAA in this matter. The appeal is disposed of accordingly. NA
1208 CICOM/A/E/23/00146 Ms. ROOP AVTAR KAUR 06-05-2023 ऑनलाइन आर.टी.आई. आवेदन एवं प्रथम अपील का अवलोकन करने पर पाया गया कि अपीलकर्ता के आर.टी. आई. आवेदन सं CICOM/R/E/2023/00297 के प्रतिउत्तर में कोई भी सूचना प्रदान नहीं की गई है। अतः केंद्रीय जन सूचना अधिकारी को यह निर्देश दिए जाता है कि वह अपीलकर्ता को आर.टी.आई. आवेदन सं. CICOM/R/E/2023/00297 तहत मांगी गई सूचना 10 दिन के भीतर दिनांक 29.05.2023 तक अपीलकर्ता को (फ्री ऑफ कॉस्ट) ऑनलाइन प्रेषित की जाये। NA
1209 CICOM/A/P/23/00074 Ms. ROOP AVTAR KAUR 04-05-2023 आर. टी. आई. आवेदन, प्रदान की गई सूचना एवं प्रथम अपील का अवलोकन करने पर पाया गया कि अपीलकर्ता के आर.टी.आई. आवेदन सं. CICOM/R/P/23/00127 में सूचना मांगी थी जिसके प्रतिउत्तर में केंद्रीय जन सूचना अधिकारी द्वारा प्रेषित की गई सूचना, सूचना का अधिकार अधिनियम के प्रावधानों एवं मांगी गई सूचना के अनुसार ही है। अतः केंद्रीय जन सूचना अधिकारी द्वारा प्रदान की गई सूचना तथ्यात्मक है और इसमें प्रथम अपीलीय अधिकारी के हस्तक्षेप की कोई आवश्यकता नहीं है। NA
1210 CICOM/A/P/23/00073 Ms. ROOP AVTAR KAUR 04-05-2023 Ref RTI No.- CICOM/R/P/23/00126 GROUNDS FOR FIRST APPEAL: The Appellant submitted first appeal stating that “Sir, in the light of above mentioned facts I, therefore, request you to kindly compare the papers sent by CPIO, NHAI, my RTI application and Hon’ble CIC order which directed the CPIO to provide the information regarding Point-2 of the RTI application dated 28.11.2019 as desired in the application dated 26.07.2021.(Annexure-1) The CPIO of NHAI in his letter dated 29.03.2023 cleverly again not provided the dimension of the acquired strip of applicant’s land.” DECISION OF FIRST APPELLATE AUTHORITY: The First Appeal, RTI application and reply given by CPIO of CIC have been perused. As per Section 2(f) of the RTI Act, 2005 only such information as is available and existing and held by the public authority or is under control of the public authority can be provided by a PIO. The PIO is not supposed to create or collate information that is not a part of the record. Accordingly, the reply given by the CPIO is appropriate and as per the provisions of the RTI Act, 2005. Hence, no intervention is required on behalf of the FAA in this matter. The appeal is disposed of accordingly. NA