There are serious errors in your form submission, please see below for details.

Search RTI Appeal

List of RTI Appeal

SNo. Registration No Appellate Authority Name Received date Reply Appeal Reply Doc
1421 CICOM/A/P/22/00194 Ms. ROOP AVTAR KAUR 30-12-2022 RTI Ref No CICOM/R/P/22/00649 प्रथम अपील का आधार “अपीलकर्ता केंद्रीय जन सूचना अधिकारी के जवाब से संतुष्ट नहीं है। निर्णय आर. टी. आई. आवेदन, प्रदान की गई सूचना एवं प्रथम अपील का अवलोकन करने पर पाया गया कि अपीलकर्ता के आर.टी.आई. आवेदन सं. CICOM/R/P/22/00649 में सूचना मांगी थी जिसके प्रतिउत्तर में केंद्रीय जन सूचना अधिकारी द्वारा प्रेषित की गई सूचना, सूचना का अधिकार अधिनियम के प्रावधानों एवं मांगी गई सूचना के अनुसार ही है। अतः केंद्रीय जन सूचना अधिकारी द्वारा प्रदान की गई सूचना तथ्यात्मक है और इसमें प्रथम अपीलीय अधिकारी के हस्तक्षेप की कोई आवश्यकता नहीं है। NA
1422 CICOM/A/P/22/00197 Ms. ROOP AVTAR KAUR 30-12-2022 Ref RTI No.- CICOM/R/P/22/00636 GROUNDS FOR FIRST APPEAL: The Appellant submitted first appeal on 22.12.2022 giving a reminder to the RTI application dated 25.11.2022. DECISION OF FIRST APPELLATE AUTHORITY: The First Appeal, RTI application and reply given by CPIO of CIC have been perused. As per Section 2(f) of the RTI Act, 2005 only such information as is available and existing and held by the public authority or is under control of the public authority can be provided by a PIO. The PIO is not supposed to create or collate information that is not a part of the record. In the instant case, CPIO furnished the reply to the RTI application on 29.12.2022 ie. within the prescribed time limit as per the RTI Act, 2005, but as mentioned by the appellant in the first appeal of non-receipt of the reply, a copy of the RTI reply is being attached with this order. Accordingly, the reply given by the CPIO is appropriate and as per the provisions of the RTI Act, 2005. Hence, no intervention is required on behalf of the FAA in this matter. The appeal is disposed of accordingly. NA
1423 CICOM/A/P/22/00192 Ms. ROOP AVTAR KAUR 29-12-2022 RTI Ref No CICOM/R/P/22/00633 प्रथम अपील का आधार “उपरोक्त विषयक एवं संदर्भित पत्र के सम्बन्ध में कृपया अवलोकन करने का कष्ट करें जिसमे आवेदक ने अपने पत्र दिनांक 24.11.2022 के अनुसार सूचना का अधिकार अधिनियम 2005 के अंतर्गत जानकारी उपलब्ध कराने का अनुरोध केंद्रीय लोक सूचना अधिकारी से दिया था लेकिन समय सीमा व्यतीत होने के कारण केंद्रीय लोक सूचना अधिकारी उपलब्ध नहीं कराइ। इसलिए विवश होकर सब आपके सामने अपील करने का बाध्य होना पड़ रहा है। निर्णय आर. टी. आई. आवेदन, प्रदान की गई सूचना एवं प्रथम अपील का अवलोकन करने पर पाया गया कि अपीलकर्ता के आर.टी.आई. आवेदन CICOM/R/P/22/00633 के प्रतिउत्तर में केंद्रीय जन सूचना अधिकारी द्वारा प्रेषित की गई सूचना, सूचना का अधिकार अधिनियम के प्रावधानों एवं मांगी गई सूचना के अनुसार ही है। परन्तु आपने अपनी प्रथम अपील में यह कहा है कि अभी तक कोई सूचना प्राप्त नहीं कराई गई। जबकि केंद्रीय जन सूचना अधिकारी द्वारा पत्र दिनांक 29.12.2022 के द्वारा सूचना भेजी का चुकी है। केंद्रीय जन सूचना अधिकारी द्वारा दी गई सूचना, दिनांक 29.12.2022 की प्रति, प्रथम अपील के आर्डर के साथ संलग्न की जा रही है I अतः केंद्रीय जन सूचना अधिकारी द्वारा प्रदान कि गई सूचना तथ्यात्मक है और इसमें प्रथम अपीलीय अधिकारी के हस्तक्षेप कि कोई आवश्यकता नहीं है I NA
1424 CICOM/A/P/22/00190 Ms. ROOP AVTAR KAUR 28-12-2022 RTI Ref No - CICOM/R/P/22/00591 प्रथम अपील का आधार “सम्बंधित लोक सूचना पदाधिकारी ने मेरे द्वारा आवेदित प्रपत्र क के विरुद्ध सूचना उपलब्ध नहीं कराई है। जिससे क्षुब्द हो यह अपील आपके समक्ष दायर की जा रही है।” निर्णय आर.टी.आई. आवेदन एवं प्रथम अपील का अवलोकन करने पर पाया गया कि अपीलकर्ता के आर.टी. आई. आवेदन सं CICOM/R/P/22/00591 के प्रतिउत्तर में कोई भी सूचना प्रदान नहीं की गई है। अतः केंद्रीय जन सूचना अधिकारी को यह निर्देश दिए जाता है कि वह अपीलकर्ता को आर.टी.आई. आवेदन सं. CICOM/R/P/22/00591 तहत मांगी गई सूचना 10 दिन के भीतर दिनांक 23.01.2023 तक अपीलकर्ता को (फ्री ऑफ कॉस्ट) ऑफलाइन प्रेषित की जाये। NA
1425 CICOM/A/P/22/00191 Ms. ROOP AVTAR KAUR 28-12-2022 Ref RTI No.- CICOM/R/P/22/00565 GROUNDS FOR FIRST APPEAL: The Appellant submitted first appeal stating that no reply has been given by the CPIO of CIC with malafide intention. DECISION OF FIRST APPELLATE AUTHORITY: The First Appeal, RTI application and reply given by CPIO of CIC have been perused. As per Section 2(f) of the RTI Act, 2005 only such information as is available and existing and held by the public authority or is under control of the public authority can be provided by a PIO. The PIO is not supposed to create or collate information that is not a part of the record. In the instant case, the CPIO furnished reply to the RTI application on 05.12.2022, but as mentioned by the appellant in the first appeal of non-receipt of the reply, a copy of the RTI reply is being attached with this order. Accordingly, the reply given by the CPIO is appropriate and as per the provisions of the RTI Act, 2005. Hence, no intervention is required on behalf of the FAA in this matter. The appeal is disposed of accordingly. NA
1426 CICOM/A/E/22/00316 Ms. ROOP AVTAR KAUR 27-12-2022 Ref RTI No.- CICOM/R/E/22/01150 GROUNDS FOR FIRST APPEAL: The Appellant submitted first appeal stating that “Respected FAA Despite of information, i have received attachment which stated that CIC does not have Secretary. The letter received is without any office order or letter no so i am not sure about validity of letter. Kindly provide me information requested. Also please provide me information with proper letter number and also name of FAA for further correspondence.” DECISION OF THE FIRST APPELLATE AUTHORITY: The First Appeal, RTI application and reply given by CPIO of CIC have been perused. As per Section 2(f) of the RTI Act, 2005 only such information as is available and existing and held by the public authority or is under control of the public authority can be provided by a PIO. The PIO is not supposed to create or collate information that is not a part of the record. Accordingly, the reply given by the CPIO is appropriate and as per the provisions of the RTI Act, 2005. Hence, no intervention is required on behalf of the FAA in this matter. The appeal is disposed of accordingly. NA
1427 CICOM/A/P/22/00186 Ms. ROOP AVTAR KAUR 27-12-2022 Ref RTI No.- CICOM/R/P/22/00615 GROUNDS FOR FIRST APPEAL: The Appellant submitted first appeal that “Hence for the proper implementation of the provisions of the RTI Act 2005 the appellant prays your honour to pass order to direct the CPIO to provide the appellant part of the required information of his RTI application dated 28/10/2022 as stated in column 6(a)(ii)(a)(b)(g) of this appeal memo and for this act of your kindness the appellant shall as in duty bound ever pray.” DECISION OF FIRST APPELLATE AUTHORITY: The First Appeal, RTI application and reply given by CPIO of CIC have been perused. As per Section 2(f) of the RTI Act, 2005 only such information as is available and existing and held by the public authority or is under control of the public authority can be provided by a PIO. The PIO is not supposed to create or collate information that is not a part of the record. Accordingly, the reply given by the CPIO is appropriate and as per the provisions of the RTI Act, 2005. Hence, no intervention is required on behalf of the FAA in this matter. The appeal is disposed of accordingly. NA
1428 CICOM/A/P/22/00185 Ms. ROOP AVTAR KAUR 26-12-2022 RTI Ref No. CICOM/R/P/22/00675 प्रथम अपील का आधार “अपीलकर्ता को समय सीमा पूरी होने पर भी अभी तक कोई सूचना उपलब्ध नहीं कराई गई है।” निर्णय आर. टी. आई. आवेदन, प्रदान की गई सूचना एवं प्रथम अपील का अवलोकन करने पर पाया गया कि अपीलकर्ता के आर.टी.आई. आवेदन CICOM/R/P/22/00675 के प्रतिउत्तर में केंद्रीय जन सूचना अधिकारी द्वारा प्रेषित की गई सूचना, सूचना का अधिकार अधिनियम के प्रावधानों एवं मांगी गई सूचना के अनुसार ही है। परन्तु आपने अपनी प्रथम अपील में यह कहा है कि अभी तक कोई सूचना प्राप्त नहीं कराई गई। जबकि केंद्रीय जन सूचना अधिकारी द्वारा पत्र दिनांक 26.12.2022 के द्वारा सूचना भेजी का चुकी है। केंद्रीय जन सूचना अधिकारी द्वारा दी गई सूचना, दिनांक 26.12.2022 की प्रति, प्रथम अपील के आर्डर के साथ संलग्न की जा रही है I अतः केंद्रीय जन सूचना अधिकारी द्वारा प्रदान कि गई सूचना तथ्यात्मक है और इसमें प्रथम अपीलीय अधिकारी के हस्तक्षेप कि कोई आवश्यकता नहीं है I NA
1429 CICOM/A/E/22/00315 Ms. ROOP AVTAR KAUR 26-12-2022 Ref RTI No.- CICOM/R/E/22/01163 GROUNDS FOR FIRST APPEAL: The Appellant submitted first appeal stating that: “(Appeal on grounds of request having been DISPOSED OF on RTI Online whereas the information requested has been refused, without any reason for rejecting the request) FACTS: On 27/11/22, w.r.t Minutes of CIC Meeting held on 09-Oct-2018 published on CIC website, I made online request No. CICOM/R/E/22/01163 for the following 5 points of information: 1. Copy of the Agenda No. 4 (Disposal by First Appellate Authority) that was Approved. 2. The file numbers and subject names of the files in which the further Action: Registrar was taken. 3. Copy of the Agenda No. 5 (Quarterly return and yearly transparency Audit) that was Approved. 4. The file numbers and subject names of the files in which the further Action: JS(MR) / JS(Law) was taken. 5. URLs at which information, if any, was published u/s 4(1)(c) about the approvals dated 09-Oct-2018. On 26/12/22, my request has been disposed of on RTI Online by uploading letter dated 23/12/22 furnishing the following: 1. The information is available in the CIC website the link of which is given below: www.cic.gov.in 2. No such information is available. 3. The information is available in the CIC website the link of which is given below: www.cic.gov.in 4. No such information is available. 3. The information is available in the CIC website the URLs of which is given below: https://cic.gov.in/sites/default/files/Circulars%20%26Noification/MOM-9-10.pdf GROUNDS: Point-1 & 3: Copies have not been provided. Precise URLs have also not been provided (as provided for point-5). Agenda cannot be found on the page www.cic.gov.in. Point-2 & 4: Particulars of files have not been provided. The particulars sought have to be available in CIC (as actions would have been taken pursuant to the Approvals and would, obviously, have been taken on files). Point-5: URL provided is of MOM attached with my request. Therein only approval decision is announced (by single word). All relevant facts thereof would have been separately published u/s 4(1)(c) (if published) by the CIC. REQUEST: Please provide with your order the copies for point-1 & 3, the particulars of files for point-2 & 4, and response of CIC Nodal Officer (for compliance of proactive disclosure guidelines) for point-3.” DECISION OF THE FIRST APPELLATE AUTHORITY: The First Appeal, RTI application and reply given by CPIO of CIC have been perused. For Point 1 & 3 CPIO(Admin Section) is directed to reply to Point no. 1 & 3 of the RTI application as per the provisions of the RTI Act, 2005 by 31.01.2023. For Point 2, 4 & 5 As per Section 2(f) of the RTI Act, 2005 only such information as is available and existing and held by the public authority or is under control of the public authority can be provided by a PIO. The PIO is not supposed to create or collate information that is not a part of the record. Accordingly, the reply given by the CPIO is appropriate and as per the provisions of the RTI Act, 2005. Hence, no intervention is required on behalf of the FAA in this matter. The appeal is disposed of accordingly. NA
1430 CICOM/A/E/22/00314 Ms. ROOP AVTAR KAUR 24-12-2022 Ref RTI No.- CICOM/R/E/22/01164 GROUNDS FOR FIRST APPEAL: The Appellant submitted first appeal stating that: “(Appeal on grounds of incomplete information) FACTS: On 27/11/22, w.r.t Minutes of CIC Meeting held on 30-Jan-2018 published on CIC website, I made request No. CICOM/R/E/22/01164 for the following 2 points of information: 1. Copy of the Agenda No. 3 (Grading of Public Authorities by Indian Law Institute). 2. The file numbers and subject names of the files in which further Action: JS(Law) was taken. On 23/12/22, Legal Cell CPIO furnished the following point-wise Reply. 1.Information is not available in Legal Cell as per available records. 2.File No. 6/1/2013/JS(Law)/CIC-III/2018 Subject Transparency Audit -2018(Reports of Transparency Audit) GROUNDS: Copy of the Agenda item would normally be kept in the file in which further action on it is taken. Original record of all Agenda items would normally be kept together elsewhere. If copy is not available in Legal Cell file in which further action was taken, copy should have been provided from wherever centralised record of CIC meetings is kept. REQUEST: Please provide with your order the copy requested in point-1 of my request dated 27/11/22.” DECISION OF THE FIRST APPELLATE AUTHORITY: The First Appeal, RTI application and reply given by CPIO of CIC have been perused. For Point 1 CPIO(Admin Section) is directed to reply to Point no. 1 of the RTI application and supply a copy of Agenda no. 3 as per the provisions of the RTI Act, 2005 by 31.01.2023. For Point 2 As per Section 2(f) of the RTI Act, 2005 only such information as is available and existing and held by the public authority or is under control of the public authority can be provided by a PIO. The PIO is not supposed to create or collate information that is not a part of the record. Accordingly, the reply given by the CPIO is appropriate and as per the provisions of the RTI Act, 2005. Hence, no intervention is required on behalf of the FAA in this matter. The appeal is disposed of accordingly. NA