There are serious errors in your form submission, please see below for details.

Search RTI Appeal

List of RTI Appeal

SNo. Registration No Appellate Authority Name Received date Reply Appeal Reply Doc
1551 CICOM/A/E/22/00239 Ms. ROOP AVTAR KAUR 03-10-2022 Ref RTI No.- CICOM/R/E/22/00721/2 GROUNDS FOR FIRST APPEAL: The Appellant submitted first appeal stating that “Take necessary action on my grievance received to CIC see grievance in attachment.” DECISION OF THE FIRST APPELLATE AUTHORITY: The First Appeal, RTI application and reply given by CPIO of CIC have been perused. As per Section 2(f) of the RTI Act, 2005 only such information as is available and existing and held by the public authority or is under control of the public authority can be provided by a PIO. The PIO is not supposed to create or collate information that is not a part of the record. In the instant case, the grounds raised by the appellant in the First Appeal do not coincide with the information sought in the RTI Application. Accordingly, the reply given by the CPIO is appropriate and as per the provisions of the RTI Act, 2005. Hence, no intervention is required on behalf of the FAA in this matter. The appeal is disposed of accordingly. NA
1552 CICOM/A/E/22/00240 Ms. ROOP AVTAR KAUR 03-10-2022 Ref RTI No.- CICOM/R/E/22/00721/1 GROUNDS FOR FIRST APPEAL: The Appellant submitted first appeal stating that “Take necessary action on my grievance received to CIC see grievance in attachment.” DECISION OF THE FIRST APPELLATE AUTHORITY: The First Appeal, RTI application and reply given by CPIO of CIC have been perused. As per Section 2(f) of the RTI Act, 2005 only such information as is available and existing and held by the public authority or is under control of the public authority can be provided by a PIO. The PIO is not supposed to create or collate information that is not a part of the record. In the instant case, the grounds raised by the appellant in the First Appeal do not coincide with the information sought in the RTI Application. Accordingly, the reply given by the CPIO is appropriate and as per the provisions of the RTI Act, 2005. Hence, no intervention is required on behalf of the FAA in this matter. The appeal is disposed of accordingly. NA
1553 CICOM/A/E/22/00237 Ms. ROOP AVTAR KAUR 01-10-2022 Ref RTI No.- CICOM/R/E/22/00854 GROUNDS FOR FIRST APPEAL: The Appellant submitted first appeal stating that “Dear Sir/Madam, The information provided was not according as was asked. From RTI Act, I am not getting clear that can a foreign national file RTI application. As per Section 3 of RTI act, all Indian citizens have right to file RTI application for information. As I am not able to find that whether a foreign national can have Indian citizen and so file an RTI application. So Pls provide the information regarding that can a foreign national file RTI apllication in any way. Thank you.” DECISION OF THE FIRST APPELLATE AUTHORITY: The First Appeal, RTI application and reply given by CPIO of CIC have been perused. As per Section 2(f) of the RTI Act, 2005 only such information as is available and existing and held by the public authority or is under control of the public authority can be provided by a PIO. The PIO is not supposed to create or collate information that is not a part of the record. Accordingly, the reply given by the CPIO is appropriate and as per the provisions of the RTI Act, 2005. Hence, no intervention is required on behalf of the FAA in this matter. The appeal is disposed of accordingly. NA
1554 CICOM/A/E/22/00238 Ms. ROOP AVTAR KAUR 01-10-2022 Ref RTI No.- CICOM/R/E/22/00854 GROUNDS FOR FIRST APPEAL: The Appellant submitted first appeal stating that “Dear Sir/Madam, The information provided was not according as was asked. From RTI Act, I am not getting clear that can a foreign national file RTI application. As per Section 3 of RTI act, all Indian citizens have right to file RTI application for information. As I am not able to find that whether a foreign national can have Indian citizen and so file an RTI application. So Pls provide the information regarding that can a foreign national file RTI apllication in any way. Thank you.” DECISION OF THE FIRST APPELLATE AUTHORITY: The First Appeal, RTI application and reply given by CPIO of CIC have been perused. As per Section 2(f) of the RTI Act, 2005 only such information as is available and existing and held by the public authority or is under control of the public authority can be provided by a PIO. The PIO is not supposed to create or collate information that is not a part of the record. Accordingly, the reply given by the CPIO is appropriate and as per the provisions of the RTI Act, 2005. Hence, no intervention is required on behalf of the FAA in this matter. The appeal is disposed of accordingly NA
1555 CICOM/A/P/22/00132 Ms. ROOP AVTAR KAUR 29-09-2022 आर. टी. आई. आवेदन, प्रदान की गई सूचना एवं प्रथम अपील का अवलोकन करने पर पाया गया कि अपीलकर्ता के आर.टी.आई. आवेदन सं. CICOM/R/P/22/00428 में सूचना मांगी थी जिसके प्रतिउत्तर में केंद्रीय जन सूचना अधिकारी द्वारा प्रेषित की गई सूचना, सूचना का अधिकार अधिनियम के प्रावधानों एवं मांगी गई सूचना के अनुसार ही है। अतः सूचना के अधिकार अधिनियम की धारा 2 (च) के प्रावधानों के अनुसार एक जन सूचना अधिकारी केवल सम्बंधित लोक प्राधिकरण के रिकॉर्ड में एक सामग्री के रूप में उपलब्ध सूचना ही प्रदान कर सकता है। अतः केंद्रीय जन सूचना अधिकारी द्वारा प्रदान की गई सूचना तथ्यात्मक है और इसमें प्रथम अपीलीय अधिकारी के हस्तक्षेप की कोई आवश्यकता नहीं है। NA
1556 CICOM/A/P/22/00133 Ms. ROOP AVTAR KAUR 29-09-2022 Ref RTI No.- CICOM/R/T/22/00077 GROUNDS FOR FIRST APPEAL: The Appellant submitted the first appeal stating that : “Rs. 130 Crore, salary & pension given to the member of Parliament by Govt. of India, vide notification No. 1/870/1C/20 dated 6-8-2020 for the year 2020-21 but this information was not provided to the applicant by Respondent vide his office order NO. CIC OM/R/T/22/00077 dated 19-9-2022 for their personnel benefit & for the damage/ harassment/mental agony of the applicant and other scheduled caste candidate. Therefore, the respondents should be punished u/s 409, 420, 120B of IPC & make the recovery of the public fund from the account/property/salary/ pension of the Respondents and pay the cost & compensation Rs. 50 Lakh to the applicant & other scheduled caste candidates for the damage/harassment/mental agony of the applicant u/s 19(8B) of RTI Act 2005 passed by Parliament in the interest of public within 10 days from received of this appeal and provide the information to the applicant regarding cost & compensation to the applicant for the damage/harassment/ mental agony of the applicant and other scheduled caste candidates.” DECISION OF FIRST APPELLATE AUTHORITY: The First Appeal, RTI application and reply given by CPIO of CIC have been perused. As per Section 2(f) of the RTI Act, 2005 only such information as is available and existing and held by the public authority or is under control of the public authority can be provided by a PIO. The PIO is not supposed to create or collate information that is not a part of the record. In the instant case, the grounds of appeal mentioned by the appellant in his First Appeal are beyond the mandate of the First Appellate Authority. Accordingly, the reply given by the CPIO is appropriate and as per the provisions of the RTI Act, 2005. Hence, no intervention is required on behalf of the FAA in this matter. The appeal is disposed of accordingly. NA
1557 CICOM/A/E/22/00236 Ms. ROOP AVTAR KAUR 29-09-2022 Ref RTI No.- CICOM/R/E/22/00761 GROUNDS FOR FIRST APPEAL: The Appellant submitted first appeal stating that “The learned CPIO deprived me from my right of access to information as no information is provided out of 9. On perusal, this is also self evident that certified copies of relevant documents, related to even single information / basis on which CPIO gave rulings, has not been provided to me. It is pertinent to mention here that similar RTI Online Applications was registered with certain Ministries, PSUs, PSBs, RBI, DFS, NITI AAYOG, CAT etc & point wise specific information along with certified copies of relevant documents have been made available by each of these Institutions. Sir, In light of above, I once again humbly request to provide me specific point wise information along with certified copies of relevant documents, especially in due consideration of commitment of criminal offences in PSU / PSB & hence exposing them involve larger public interest.” DECISION OF THE FIRST APPELLATE AUTHORITY: The First Appeal, RTI application and reply given by CPIO of CIC have been perused. As per Section 2(f) of the RTI Act, 2005 only such information as is available and existing and held by the public authority or is under control of the public authority can be provided by a PIO. The PIO is not supposed to create or collate information that is not a part of the record. Accordingly, the reply given by the CPIO is appropriate and as per the provisions of the RTI Act, 2005. Hence, no intervention is required on behalf of the FAA in this matter. The appeal is disposed of accordingly. NA
1558 CICOM/A/E/22/00235 Ms. ROOP AVTAR KAUR 27-09-2022 Ref RTI No.- CICOM/R/E/22/00886 GROUNDS FOR FIRST APPEAL: The Appellant submitted first appeal stating that “Objection: CPIOS (Reply is No action required in this case) this is highly objectionable along with violations U/s 7 (1&2 of sub section 1) of RTI Act 2005. Note: I have sent Email to (CIC) Chief Information Commissioner Along with reply Letter of Enforcement Directorate Office Attached herewith too. Kindly arrange MANDATORY HEARING for My online this 1st Appeal.” DECISION OF THE FIRST APPELLATE AUTHORITY: The First Appeal, RTI application and reply given by CPIO of CIC have been perused. The opportunity of written submission, for the first appeal, provided to the appellant is found to be reasonable opportunity of hearing. The written submissions made by the appellant in his first appeal application are found to be sufficient for consideration by the FAA to arrive at a decision under the RTI Act, 2005. Accordingly, it was felt that the personal hearing as requested by appellant was not necessary. As per Section 2(f) of the RTI Act, 2005 only such information as is available and existing and held by the public authority or is under control of the public authority can be provided by a PIO. The PIO is not supposed to create or collate information that is not a part of the record. Accordingly, the reply given by the CPIO is appropriate and as per the provisions of the RTI Act, 2005. Hence, no intervention is required on behalf of the FAA in this matter. The appeal is disposed of accordingly. NA
1559 CICOM/A/E/22/00234 Ms. ROOP AVTAR KAUR 24-09-2022 Ref RTI No.- CICOM/R/E/22/00757 GROUNDS FOR FIRST APPEAL: The Appellant submitted first appeal stating that “Sir I am sought an information about 2nd appeal/compliant/ File details , complete record with direction by various high court of india alongwith Delhi High court, New Delhi of schedule of early hearing through writ petition at available on Appcom software in central information commission, New Delhi.but CPIO/ S.O legal cell has not been provided any information yet witin stipulated time under RTI act.” DECISION OF THE FIRST APPELLATE AUTHORITY: The First Appeal, RTI application and reply given by CPIO of CIC have been perused. As per Section 2(f) of the RTI Act, 2005 only such information as is available and existing and held by the public authority or is under control of the public authority can be provided by a PIO. The PIO is not supposed to create or collate information that is not a part of the record. In the instant case, the CPIO (Legal Cell) has provided the information to the appellant on 26.09.2022 and the reply given by the CPIO is appropriate and as per the provisions of the RTI Act, 2005. Hence, no intervention is required on behalf of the FAA in this matter. The appeal is disposed of accordingly. NA
1560 CICOM/A/P/22/00129 Ms. ROOP AVTAR KAUR 22-09-2022 Ref RTI No.- CICOM/R/P/22/00345 GROUNDS FOR FIRST APPEAL: The Appellant submitted the first appeal stating that no information was provided by the CPIO even after expiry of more than two months. DECISION OF FIRST APPELLATE AUTHORITY: The First Appeal application and the RTI application have been perused. In the instant case, CPIO (DR to IC-UM) is directed to reply to the RTI application as per the provisions of the RTI Act, 2005 by 26.10.2022, free of cost. The appeal is disposed of accordingly. NA