There are serious errors in your form submission, please see below for details.

Search RTI Appeal

List of RTI Appeal

SNo. Registration No Appellate Authority Name Received date Reply Appeal Reply Doc
1531 CICOM/A/E/22/00254 Ms. ROOP AVTAR KAUR 14-10-2022 ऑनलाइन आर. टी. आई. आवेदन, प्रदान की गई सूचना एवं प्रथम अपील का अवलोकन करने पर पाया गया कि अपीलकर्ता के आर.टी.आई. आवेदन सं. CICOM/R/E/22/00842 में सूचना मांगी थी जिसके प्रतिउत्तर में बिंदु संख्या 1, 2 एवं 4 केंद्रीय जन सूचना अधिकारी द्वारा प्रेषित की गई सूचना, सूचना का अधिकार अधिनियम के प्रावधानों एवं मांगी गई सूचना के अनुसार ही है। अतः सूचना के अधिकार अधिनियम की धारा 2 (च) के प्रावधानों के अनुसार एक जन सूचना अधिकारी केवल सम्बंधित लोक प्राधिकरण के रिकॉर्ड में एक सामग्री के रूप में उपलब्ध सूचना ही प्रदान कर सकता है, तथा बिंदु संख्या 4 में आर.टी.आई अधिनियम 2005 के अनुभाग 8 (1) (j) के अनुसार सूचना, जो व्यक्तिगत सूचना से संबंधित है, उसकी जानकारी प्रदान नहीं की जा सकती। अतः केंद्रीय जन सूचना अधिकारी द्वारा प्रदान की गई सूचना तथ्यात्मक है और इसमें प्रथम अपीलीय अधिकारी के हस्तक्षेप की कोई आवश्यकता नहीं है। NA
1532 CICOM/A/E/22/00252 Ms. ROOP AVTAR KAUR 12-10-2022 Ref RTI No.- CICOM/R/E/22/00742 GROUNDS FOR FIRST APPEAL: The Appellant submitted first appeal stating that no response received within the time limit. DECISION OF THE FIRST APPELLATE AUTHORITY: The First Appeal and the RTI application have been perused. In the instant case, CPIO (DR to IC-UM) is directed to reply to the RTI application and provide the information as sought by the appellant as per the provisions of the RTI Act, 2005 by 11.11.2022, free of cost. The appeal is disposed of accordingly. NA
1533 CICOM/A/E/22/00250 Ms. ROOP AVTAR KAUR 11-10-2022 Ref RTI No.- CICOM/R/E/22/00956 GROUNDS FOR FIRST APPEAL: The Appellant submitted first appeal stating that “FACTS: On 03/10/22 I made online request No. CICOM/R/E/22/00956. In it I have first set out the apparent contradiction between, on one hand, section 25(2) of the RTI Act 2005 and, on the other, para-4 of the guidelines for implementation of suo motu disclosure under Section 4 of RTI Act issued by the DOPT in 2013 & 2019. Then I have requested copies of all relevant records whereby the CIC is directly receiving (for purpose of examining and offering advice / recommendations) reports from around 2270 MINISTRIES / PUBLIC AUTHORITIES instead of from around 100 MINISTRIES / DEPARTMENTS. On 11/10/22 my request has been disposed of with the following online Reply (with plain paper printout of the same, instead of signed letter on letterhead, uploaded therewith): Reply :- Ms Gita Dewan Verma Requisite information/record cannot be provided as Central Information Commission donot receive any record/information directly. All records/Informations filled on line by the Public Authorities. GROUNDS: A. Reply, containing neither the requested copies not any reason from u/s 8 or 9, bears no relation to the required decision u/s 7(1) to which I am entitled by law. B. Reply bears no relation to my request. The requested copies are of records (decisions / orders / rules / etc) whereby CIC is receiving 2270 odd reports instead of around 100. The requested information is prior to and independent of the reports of the public authorities to which Reply refers. C. Reply also makes no sense in itself. It is to the effect that what is received online is not directly received and held by CIC. By that logic, my present online request was also not directly received and held by CIC for CPIO to process. REQUEST: Please quash the so-called Reply dated 11/10/22 to my request No. CICOM/R/E/22/00956 dated 03/10/22 and. As no exemption has been invoked, please provide the requested copies with your order. NB: My appeal request is, and Reply of CPIO is not, consistent with the RTI Act. In case you are inclined to reject my appeal, please hold hearing first.” DECISION OF THE FIRST APPELLATE AUTHORITY: The First Appeal, RTI application and reply given by CPIO of CIC have been perused. In the instant case, the CPIO (M&R Section) is directed to revisit the RTI application and provide the information as per the available records and complying with the provisions of the RTI Act, 2005, by 18.11.2022. The appeal is disposed of accordingly. NA
1534 CICOM/A/E/22/00251 Ms. ROOP AVTAR KAUR 11-10-2022 Ref RTI No. - CICOM/R/E/22/00970 GROUNDS FOR FIRST APPEAL: The Appellant submitted first appeal stating that “FACTS: On 06/10/22 I made online request No. CICOM/R/E/22/00970. In it I have first set out the various RTI NODAL OFFICERS that are disclosed by way of (a) List published on CIC website of RTI NODAL OFFICER of 2281 PAs, (b) CIC Circular requesting particulars of NODAL OFFICER of Training Institute nominated by PAs for Transparency Audit as per DOPT guidelines, and (c) the said DOPT guidelines requiring PAs to appoint NODAL OFFICER for purpose of disclosures u/s 4. Then I have requested information of: (1) The functions / powers and duties of the above-mentioned and all of any other NODAL OFFICERS of the CIC itself, and (2) The Lists, such as of the RTI NODAL OFFICER that is published for 2281 Public Authorities, of the other NODAL OFFICERS in the Public Authorities. On 11/10/22 my request has been disposed of with the following online Reply (with plain paper printout of the same, instead of signed letter on letterhead, uploaded therewith): Reply :- Ms Gita Dewan Verma Please refer to your above RTI application. Reply for point No. 1 to 2 is as under:- Point No. 1. No such information is available in record. Point No. 2. No such information is available in record. GROUNDS: My request has NOT been duly disposed of. Reply, containing neither the requested copies not any reason from u/s 8 or 9, bears no relation to the required decision u/s 7(1) to which I am entitled by law. CPIO is apparently not CPIO concerned with the matter and, instead of either forwarding to the CPIO concerned or himself accessing the information u/s 5(4) to furnish to me, has in fact refused - without due cause and with undue haste. Specifically: Point-1: Information of functions / powers and duties of NODAL OFFICERS designated / nominated / appointed in CIC has to be matter of record and cannot be denied to me because it is liable to be published u/s 4(1)(b)(ii). It may be refused in terms of section 2(f) ONLY by informing that the CIC has not designated / nominated / appointed any NODAL OFFICERS for itself. Point-2: Information of NODAL OFFICERS for purpose of transparency audit is entered into the software developed by CIC, i.e., it is information held by CIC in form from which the requested lists can be readily generated. The information cannot be denied to me because it (and, indeed, nothing about transparency audits and public disclosures u/s 4 of the Act) is patently not in ambit of any reason u/s 8 or 9. REQUEST: Please quash the so-called Reply dated 11/10/22 to my request No. CICOM/R/E/22/00970 dated 06/10/22 and please provide the requested information with your order. NB: My appeal request is, and Reply of CPIO is not, consistent with the RTI Act. In case you are inclined to reject my appeal, please hold hearing first..” DECISION OF THE FIRST APPELLATE AUTHORITY: The First Appeal, RTI application and reply given by CPIO of CIC have been perused. In the instant case, the CPIO (M&R Section) is directed to revisit the RTI application and provide the information as per the available records and complying with the provisions of the RTI Act, 2005, by 18.11.2022. The appeal is disposed of accordingly. NA
1535 CICOM/A/P/22/00138 Ms. ROOP AVTAR KAUR 10-10-2022 आर. टी. आई. आवेदन, प्रदान की गई सूचना एवं प्रथम अपील का अवलोकन करने पर पाया गया कि अपीलकर्ता के आर.टी.आई. आवेदन सं. CICOM/R/P/22/00438 में सूचना मांगी थी जिसके प्रतिउत्तर में केंद्रीय जन सूचना अधिकारी द्वारा प्रेषित की गई सूचना, सूचना का अधिकार अधिनियम के प्रावधानों एवं मांगी गई सूचना के अनुसार ही है। अतः केंद्रीय जन सूचना अधिकारी द्वारा प्रदान की गई सूचना तथ्यात्मक है और इसमें प्रथम अपीलीय अधिकारी के हस्तक्षेप की कोई आवश्यकता नहीं है। NA
1536 CICOM/A/P/22/00139 Ms. ROOP AVTAR KAUR 10-10-2022 Ref RTI No.- CICOM/R/P/22/00485 GROUNDS FOR FIRST APPEAL: The Appellant submitted the first appeal stating that : “A = That, Your CPIO has not followed the word “Print copy” so incorporated in the U/s-4(4) of the RTI Act-2005 for which your FAA may Review the activities of the CPIO B=That, Your CPIO may download said Information and may send the same through email to the RTI Applicant for the successful compliance of the U/s 4(4) of the RTI Act-2005 C= That , Your CPIO can not waive out the liabilities and responsibilities in the name of the website as because U/s-4(4) of the RTI Act-205 is standing as a Right as per U/s-2(j) &3 of the RTI Act-2005.” DECISION OF FIRST APPELLATE AUTHORITY: The First Appeal, RTI application and reply given by CPIO of CIC have been perused. As per Section 2(f) of the RTI Act, 2005 only such information as is available and existing and held by the public authority or is under control of the public authority can be provided by a PIO. The PIO is not supposed to create or collate information that is not a part of the record. The information once published in public domain may not be treated as information held by a particular public authority. Accordingly, the reply given by the CPIO is appropriate and as per the provisions of the RTI Act, 2005. Hence, no intervention is required on behalf of the FAA in this matter. The appeal is disposed of accordingly. NA
1537 CICOM/A/P/22/00140 Ms. ROOP AVTAR KAUR 10-10-2022 Ref RTI No. - CICOM/R/P/22/00417 GROUNDS FOR FIRST APPEAL: The Appellant submitted the first appeal stating that no information was provided by the CPIO. DECISION OF FIRST APPELLATE AUTHORITY: The First Appeal application and the RTI application have been perused. In the instant case, CPIO (DR to IC-UM) is directed to reply to the RTI application as per the provisions of the RTI Act, 2005 by 18.11.2022, free of cost. The appeal is disposed of accordingly. NA
1538 CICOM/A/P/22/00137 Ms. ROOP AVTAR KAUR 10-10-2022 आर. टी. आई. आवेदन, प्रदान की गई सूचना एवं प्रथम अपील का अवलोकन करने पर पाया गया कि अपीलकर्ता के आर.टी.आई. आवेदन सं. CICOM/R/P/22/00449 में सूचना मांगी थी जिसके प्रतिउत्तर में केंद्रीय जन सूचना अधिकारी द्वारा प्रेषित की गई सूचना, सूचना का अधिकार अधिनियम के प्रावधानों एवं मांगी गई सूचना के अनुसार ही है। अतः केंद्रीय जन सूचना अधिकारी द्वारा प्रदान की गई सूचना तथ्यात्मक है और इसमें प्रथम अपीलीय अधिकारी के हस्तक्षेप की कोई आवश्यकता नहीं है। NA
1539 CICOM/A/P/22/00141 Ms. ROOP AVTAR KAUR 10-10-2022 Ref RTI No.- CICOM/R//P/22/00423 GROUNDS FOR FIRST APPEAL: The Appellant submitted the first appeal stating that no information was provided by the CPIO. DECISION OF FIRST APPELLATE AUTHORITY: The First Appeal application and the RTI application have been perused. In the instant case, CPIO (DR to IC-UM) is directed to reply to the RTI application as per the provisions of the RTI Act, 2005 by 18.11.2022, free of cost. The appeal is disposed of accordingly. NA
1540 CICOM/A/P/22/00136 Ms. ROOP AVTAR KAUR 10-10-2022 आर. टी. आई. आवेदन, प्रदान की गई सूचना एवं प्रथम अपील का अवलोकन करने पर पाया गया कि अपीलकर्ता के आर.टी.आई. आवेदन सं. CICOM/R/P/22/00413 में सूचना मांगी थी जिसके प्रतिउत्तर में केंद्रीय जन सूचना अधिकारी द्वारा प्रेषित की गई सूचना, सूचना का अधिकार अधिनियम के प्रावधानों एवं मांगी गई सूचना के अनुसार ही है। अतः सूचना के अधिकार अधिनियम की धारा 2 (च) के प्रावधानों के अनुसार एक जन सूचना अधिकारी केवल सम्बंधित लोक प्राधिकरण के रिकॉर्ड में एक सामग्री के रूप में उपलब्ध सूचना ही प्रदान कर सकता है। अतः केंद्रीय जन सूचना अधिकारी द्वारा प्रदान की गई सूचना तथ्यात्मक है और इसमें प्रथम अपीलीय अधिकारी के हस्तक्षेप की कोई आवश्यकता नहीं है। NA