There are serious errors in your form submission, please see below for details.

Search RTI Appeal

List of RTI Appeal

SNo. Registration No Appellate Authority Name Received date Reply Appeal Reply Doc
1911 CICOM/A/E/21/00277 Ms. ROOP AVTAR KAUR 30-12-2021 Ref RTI No.- CICOM/R/E/21/01071 GROUNDS FOR FIRST APPEAL: The Appellant submitted first appeal stating : 1. CPIO Shri S K Chitkara Provided NO Information 2. It appears that Nodal Officer has not sent the RTI application to custodian CPIOs of CIC holding the information as per CPIO duty distribution list published on CIC website. 3. Natural justice is being denied to Information Seeker /Complainant because Respondents are able to see updated e-book of any complaint/appeal /any communication in respect of file any file related to Respondents at a click of button ( Pl peruse CIC document annexed as Annexure) but Information Seeker / Complainant is denied the same information inspite of RTI application. 4. In view of CIC document retention policy of 6 months, as communicated by CPIO Shri Subodh Kumar vide letter CICOM/R/E/21/00558 dated 09-09-2021 1st AA is requested to order CPIOs to provide complete information as requested in RTI Application. 5. 1st Appellate Authority (under RTI Act),Central Information Commission, is also requested to direct all concerned to retain all related records till the disposal of 2nd appeal/complaint if the need so arises due to order of 1st Appellate Authority/its implementation by the concerned CPIOs. DECISION OF THE FIRST APPELLATE AUTHORITY: The First Appeal petition, RTI application and reply given by CPIO of CIC have been perused. In the instant case, the CPIO DR to CIC(YS) is directed to revisit the RTI application and appropriately reply to the appellant by 31/01/2022, free of cost. The appeal is disposed of accordingly. NA
1912 CICOM/A/E/21/00278 Ms. ROOP AVTAR KAUR 30-12-2021 ऑनलाइन आर. टी. आई. आवेदन, प्रदान की गई सूचना एवं प्रथम अपील का अवलोकन करने पर पाया गया कि अपीलकर्ता के आर.टी.आई. आवेदन सं. CICOM/R/E/21/01128 के प्रतिउत्तर में केंद्रीय जन सूचना अधिकारी द्वारा प्रेषित की गई सूचना, सूचना का अधिकार अधिनियम के प्रावधानों एवं मांगी गई सूचना के अनुसार ही है। उल्लेखनीय है कि सूचना अधिकार अधिकारी अधिनियम की धारा 2 (च) के प्रावधानों के अनुसार एक जन सूचना अधिकारी केवल सम्बंधित लोक प्राधिकरण के रिकॉर्ड में एक सामग्री के रूप में उपलब्ध सूचना ही प्रदान कर सकता है। अतः केंद्रीय जन सूचना अधिकारी द्वारा प्रदान की गई सूचना तथ्यात्मक है और इसमें प्रथम अपीलीय अधिकारी के हस्तक्षेप की कोई आवश्यकता नहीं है। NA
1913 CICOM/A/E/21/00279 Ms. ROOP AVTAR KAUR 30-12-2021 Ref RTI No.- CICOM/R/E/21/01195 GROUNDS FOR FIRST APPEAL: The Appellant submitted first appeal stating: Ground of Appeal Since audio Recording Facility is not available information pretaining to Gradiente infotainment ltd which was never disclosed by CIC & Sebi Should Be disclose, information exist under RTI Act 2005 Since it preatains to same issue and comes on record of CIC 1.Annexure E States of Sebi 3000 Shares was not Recived by company on year 1995 But Received after taking up from the company on year 2014 2.Annexure E Documents Submitted by sebi Annexed with refrence Complaint Details Dated 29 May 2014 Given to sebi Ref SEBIE/AP14/0000171/1 with refrence to year 1995 3.Annexure E Documents Submitted by Sebi Dated 29 May 2014 Conformation of Documents of Email of Gradiente Infotainment ltd Conforming from Company with Refrence to 3000 Shares and their Reply with 15 Days Further it is clean evidence by company only dispatched information was provided through email and allotment information was not provided and transfered of shares was not provided And these three information proves sebi was doing Assumption and it becomes a public information and public document DECISION OF THE FIRST APPELLATE AUTHORITY: The First Appeal petition, RTI application and reply given by CPIO of CIC have been perused. The CPIO-CIC has provided information as per the records of the Commission. As per Section 2(f) of RTI Act, 2005 only such information as is available and existing and held by the public authority or is under control of the public authority can be provided by a PIO. The PIO is not supposed to create or collect information that is not a part of the record. He is also not required to interpret information or decision of CIC. Accordingly, the reply given by the CPIO is appropriate and as per the provisions of the RTI Act, 2005. Hence, no intervention is required on behalf of the FAA in this matter. The appeal is disposed of accordingly. NA
1914 CICOM/A/E/21/00273 Ms. ROOP AVTAR KAUR 28-12-2021 Ref RTI No.- CICOM/R/E/21/01070 GROUNDS FOR FIRST APPEAL: The Appellant submitted first appeal stating : SBI in response to CIC letter dated 13-09+2021 were attached is totally false except tripartite agreement and contradictory to page no 03 of tripartite agreement and various reply sent by SBI to appleallant. DECISION OF THE FIRST APPELLATE AUTHORITY: The First Appeal petition, RTI application and reply given by CPIO of CIC have been perused. The CPIO-CIC has provided information as per the records of the Commission. As per Section 2(f) of RTI Act, 2005 only such information as is available and existing and held by the public authority or is under control of the public authority can be provided by a PIO. The PIO is not supposed to create or collect information that is not a part of the record. He is also not required to interpret information or decision of CIC. Accordingly, the reply given by the CPIO is appropriate and as per the provisions of the RTI Act, 2005. Hence, no intervention is required on behalf of the FAA in this matter. The appeal is disposed of accordingly. NA
1915 CICOM/A/E/21/00274 Ms. ROOP AVTAR KAUR 28-12-2021 Ref RTI No.- CICOM/R/E/21/01058/3 GROUNDS FOR FIRST APPEAL: The Appellant submitted first appeal stating : The information provided by the CPIO onpoint 10(a) is not appropriate. The link provided by the CPIO does not have the information regarding the appeals on which the CPIO has not complied the directions of the Information Commissioner and are found suitable to initiate the proceedings u/s 20 of RTI Act, 2005. I have received a similar link from Sh. S.K. Chitkara (CPIO) in compliance to decision of FAA (RTI) in r/o CIC0M/A/E/21/00252. The link is not related to the desired information. As a senior citizen lady, I am finding it difficult to search for the information related to penalty proceedings in r/o appeal CIC/ALS0I/A/2019/661282 as the CPIO misled the Information Commissioner on points 6 & 8 of the RTI Application & provided irrelevant information in compliance to CIC decision dt. 3-2-21 (Ref : Link paper 651629). RELIEF SOUGHT : It is in larger public interest to arrange for the dissemination of the information regarding appeals found suitable for penalty proceedings along with cause list of penalty proceeding hearing on the CIC website as per section 4 of RTI Act. DECISION OF THE FIRST APPELLATE AUTHORITY: The First Appeal petition, RTI application and reply given by CPIO of CIC have been perused. As per Section 2(f) of RTI Act, 2005 only such information as is available and existing and held by the public authority or is under control of the public authority can be provided by a PIO. The PIO is not supposed to create or collect information that is not a part of the record. He is also not required to segregate, interpret information or decision of CIC. The information once published in public domain may not be treated as information held by a particular public authority. Accordingly, the reply given by the CPIO is appropriate and as per the provisions of the RTI Act, 2005. Hence, no intervention is required on behalf of the FAA in this matter. The appeal is disposed of accordingly. NA
1916 CICOM/A/P/21/00147 Ms. ROOP AVTAR KAUR 27-12-2021 Ref RTI No.- CICOM/R/P/21/00567 GROUNDS FOR FIRST APPEAL: The Appellant mentions that the he did not sought any opinion, and asks as follows- Can the CIC take action against the revenue department under the RTI Act or any CIC provision or procedure for this wilful suppression of information. Question about the Act has been asked. DECISION OF FIRST APPELLATE AUTHORITY: The First Appeal petition, RTI application and reply given by CPIO of CIC have been perused. The CPIO has provided information as sought by the Appellant in his RTI Application. As per Section 2(f) of RTI Act, 2005 only such information as is available and existing and held by the public authority or is under control of the public authority can be provided by a PIO. The PIO is not supposed to create or collect information that is not a part of the record. He is also not required to interpret information or decision of CIC. Accordingly, the reply given by the CPIO is appropriate and as per the provisions of the RTI Act, 2005. Hence, no intervention is required on behalf of the FAA in this matter. The appeal is disposed off accordingly. NA
1917 CICOM/A/P/21/00148 Ms. ROOP AVTAR KAUR 27-12-2021 आर. टी. आई. आवेदन, प्रदान की गई सूचना एवं प्रथम अपील का अवलोकन करने पर पाया गया कि अपीलकर्ता के आर.टी.आई. आवेदन सं. CICOM/R/P/21/00575 के प्रतिउत्तर में केंद्रीय जन सूचना अधिकारी द्वारा प्रेषित की गई सूचना, सूचना का अधिकार अधिनियम के प्रावधानों एवं मांगी गई सूचना के अनुसार ही है। अतः केंद्रीय जन सूचना अधिकारी द्वारा प्रदान की गई सूचना तथ्यात्मक है और इसमें प्रथम अपीलीय अधिकारी के हस्तक्षेप की कोई आवश्यकता नहीं है। NA
1918 CICOM/A/P/21/00149 Ms. ROOP AVTAR KAUR 27-12-2021 Ref RTI No.- CICOM/R/P/21/00573 GROUNDS FOR FIRST APPEAL: The Appellant in the first appeal application prayed as following: A) Pass an order direct the PIO to immediately provide the true, correct and accurate information of Query 2 to 4. B) Pass an order direct the PIO to provide a token compensation of Rs. 200/- for the mental pain, agony, injury, financially loss and determent suffered to the appellant. C) Pass any other such further orders be also passed that this First Appellant Authority may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of appeal in favour of appellant and against the PIO/Respondent in the interest of justice, equity and good conscience. D) Please to add the additional facts and grounds in the first appeal dated 16.12.2021. E) Pass an order directing the Respondents to produce the strict proof of correspondence held between as per Section 5(4) of the RTI Act. DECISION OF FIRST APPELLATE AUTHORITY: The First Appeal petition, RTI application and CPIO’s reply have been perused. The CPIO of CIC have provided information as per the records of the Commission. As per Section 2(f) of RTI Act, 2005 only such information as is available and existing and held by the public authority or is under control of the public authority can be provided by a PIO. The PIO is not supposed to create or collect information that is not a part of the record. He is also not required to interpret information or decision of CIC. In the instant case, the information sought by the Appellant in the RTI application is provided by the CPIO within the prescribed time as per RTI Act, 2005. Therefore, no intervention is required on behalf of the FAA in this matter. The appeal is disposed of accordingly. NA
1919 CICOM/A/P/21/00151 Ms. ROOP AVTAR KAUR 27-12-2021 Ref RTI No. - CICOM/R/E/21/01043 GROUNDS FOR FIRST APPEAL: The Appellant submitted first appeal mentioning that information provided by the CPIOs is incorrect, false and misleading. DECISION OF FIRST APPELLATE AUTHORITY: The First Appeal petition, RTI application and CPIO’s reply have been perused. The CPIO of CIC have provided information as per the records of the Commission As per Section 2(f) of RTI Act, 2005 only such information as is available and existing and held by the public authority or is under control of the public authority can be provided by a PIO. The PIO is not supposed to create or collect information that is not a part of the record. Therefore, no intervention is required on behalf of the FAA in this matter. The appeal is disposed of accordingly. NA
1920 CICOM/A/P/21/00152 Ms. ROOP AVTAR KAUR 27-12-2021 आर. टी. आई. आवेदन, प्रदान की गई सूचना एवं प्रथम अपील का अवलोकन करने पर पाया गया कि अपीलकर्ता के आर.टी.आई. आवेदन सं. CICOM/R/P/21/00476 के प्रतिउत्तर में केंद्रीय जन सूचना अधिकारी द्वारा प्रेषित की गई सूचना, सूचना का अधिकार अधिनियम के प्रावधानों एवं मांगी गई सूचना के अनुसार ही है। अतः केंद्रीय जन सूचना अधिकारी द्वारा प्रदान की गई सूचना तथ्यात्मक है और इसमें प्रथम अपीलीय अधिकारी के हस्तक्षेप की कोई आवश्यकता नहीं है। NA