| SNo. |
Registration No |
Appellate Authority Name |
Received date |
Reply Appeal |
Reply Doc |
| 2531 |
CICOM/A/E/20/00098 |
Ms. ROOP AVTAR KAUR |
15-07-2020 |
On perusal of the Appeal, RTI application and reply given by the CPIOs, it is seen that Sh. T. B. J. S. Rajappa, former CPIO, RTI Cell has forwarded the RTI application to two CPIOs namely Sh. C. Vinod Babu and Sh. S. K. Rabbani without mentioning the Point on which they were to reply to the RTI, due to which the CPIOs replied only to the points concerning them.
It is seen from the appeal that in the column “Prayer or Relief sought†, the Appellant mentions about some information not being made available, some of which were not a part of the RTI application dated 16.05.2020 and cannot be admitted at the Appeal stage. It is seen that Sh. C. Vinod Babu has provided information to the queries related to him, however, he is once again directed to revisit the reply given by him on points 1 to 8 and 12 to 15 and accordingly provide information (also to point 9) to the Appellant as per provisions of the RTI Act, 2005 within ten days of receipt of this order.
Sh. Kishore Kumar Pukhral, CPIO, Legal Cell is directed to provide information to the Appellant on Point No. 16 to 19 of the RTI application dated 16.05.2020 (copy of RTI application is attached) as per provisions of the RTI Act, 2005 within ten days of receipt of this order.
  |
NA |
| 2532 |
CICOM/A/P/20/00053 |
AJITKUMAR VASANTRAO SONTAKKE |
08-07-2020 |
Please see the file. |
 |
| 2533 |
CICOM/A/P/20/00052 |
Ms. ROOP AVTAR KAUR |
08-07-2020 |
Please see the file. |
|
| 2534 |
CICOM/A/E/20/00097 |
Ms. ROOP AVTAR KAUR |
08-07-2020 |
Perused the Appeal, RTI application and replies given by CPIOs as attached, It is seen that the following CPIOs have provided information sought for are given below:-
Sh. Jeevan Chandra for Point No. 1, 2 and 3 on 29.06.2020
Sh. Krishan Avtar Talwar for Point No. 6 & 7 on 27.06.2020
Sh. K. L. Das for Point No. 8 on 30.06.2020
The contention of the Appellant in his appeal on points no. 1, 2 & 3 is not agreed to, since, the CPIO has provided information as per RTI Act, 2005. Shri. Amit Tiwari, CPIO is directed to provide information for point no. 4 & 5 to the Appellant as per provisions of the RTI Act, 2005 within ten days of receipt of this order.
Sh. K. L. Das, CPIO had provided information to the Applicant, however, is directed to revisit reply given by him on 30.06.2020 and provide information to the Appellant as per provisions of the RTI Act, 2005 within ten days of receipt of this order. |
NA |
| 2535 |
CICOM/A/E/20/00095 |
Ms. ROOP AVTAR KAUR |
06-07-2020 |
On perusal of the Appeal, RTI application and replies given by four CPIOs namely Sh. K. L. Das, Sh. R. P. Grover, Sh. S. C. Sharma and Sh. Jeevan Chandra on specific points concerning them, it is seen that the CPIOs have provided the desired information as per provisions of the RTI Act, 2005. Hence, no further intervention is required on the part of FAA in the matter. |
NA |
| 2536 |
CICOM/A/E/20/00096 |
Ms. ROOP AVTAR KAUR |
06-07-2020 |
On perusal of the Appeal, RTI application and reply of the CPIO, it is observed that the reply given by the CPIO is as per provisions of RTI Act, 2005, therefore, no further intervention is required on part of FAA in the matter. |
NA |
| 2537 |
CICOM/A/E/20/00094 |
Ms. ROOP AVTAR KAUR |
03-07-2020 |
On perusal of the Appeal, RTI application and replies given by CPIO, Sh. Krishan Avtar Talwar for Point No. 1 to 6 and Sh. R. P. Singh for Point No. 7 to 10, it is seen that the CPIOs have provided the desired information as per provisions of the RTI Act, 2005. Hence, no further intervention is required on the part of FAA in the matter.
  |
NA |
| 2538 |
CICOM/A/E/20/00093 |
Ms. ROOP AVTAR KAUR |
30-06-2020 |
On perusal of the Appeal, RTI application and Replies given by CPIOs, it is observed that the Appellant has sought information related to DERA MANDI GREENS WELFARE ASSOCIATION, in this context, the reply given by CPIO is factual. This office does not deal with the information sought and you are advised to approach the department which deals with registration of NGO/Society. The appeal is being disposed off accordingly. |
NA |
| 2539 |
CICOM/A/E/20/00092 |
Ms. ROOP AVTAR KAUR |
28-06-2020 |
Perused the Appeal, RTI application and replies given by CPIOs as attached, it is observed that the information sought by the Appellant is voluminous in nature and Appellant is requested note for future that as given in Section 3 of the RTI Rules, 2012 that RTI application shall ordinarily not contain more than five hundred words, excluding annexure, address of the Central Public Information Officer and that of the applicant. However, even in adverse conditions due to covid-19 pandemic and restricted manpower post lockdown, CPIOs have provided all the available information for Point No 1 to 21 as per provisions of the RTI Act, 2005.
It is noted that the following CPIOs have provided information sought for are given below:-
Sh. Vinod Babu for Point No. 1 to 10 and 16 on 12.06.2020
Sh. Jeevan Chandra for Point No. 11 & 12 on 09.06.2020
Sh. Krishan Avtar Talwar for Point No. 13 & 14 on 17.06.2020
Sh. A. K. Assija for Point No.15 &17 on 11.06.2020
Sh. K. L. Das for Point No. 18 on 09.06.2020
Sh. S. C. Sharma for Point No. 19 to 21 on 12.06.2020.
It is also seen that the said RTI application was received during the lockdown period and office was working with restricted number of employees, according to the guidelines issued by Govt. of India after partial lockdown/unlock-1. Sh. Jeevan Chandra, CPIO had received the said RTI on 29.05.2020, Sh. Vinod Babu, CPIO had received on 01.06.2020, Sh. A. K. Assija, CPIO had received on 08.06.2020, Sh. Krishan Avtar Talwar, Sh. K. L. Das and Sh. S. C. Sharma had received on 09.06.2020 as stated in their replies and all the above CPIOs have provided the information within timeline stated under the RTI Act, 2005.
It is noted that most of the information sought by the Appellant is available in the public domain. On perusal of contents of the appeal, it is further evident that most of the information sought by the Appellant was already available with him.
Further, the information given by Sh. K. L. Das for Point No. 18 is as per provision of RTI Act, 2005 & in accordance with the information sought by the Appellant through his RTI application. Communication from Appellant after receipt of letter dated 09.09.2019 in the Commission was not mentioned in Point No. 18 of his RTI application, and thus is an additional information sought and hence cannot be considered at First Appeal stage.
It has also been observed that Sh. A. K. Assija has sent the desired information for Point No. 15 on Appellant’s email id. However, the Appellant has stated that “No email along with the sought pieces of information, ever been received by me till dateâ€. Therefore, Sh. A. K. Assija, CPIO is hereby directed to resend the reply against point No. 15 of the RTI application within 10 days after receipt of the order.
The information given by above CPIOs is as per provision of RTI Act, 2005 on the information sought by the Appellant. No further intervention is required on the part of FAA in the matter. |
NA |
| 2540 |
CICOM/A/E/20/00090 |
Ms. ROOP AVTAR KAUR |
26-06-2020 |
On perusal of the Appeal, RTI application and reply given by CPIO on the 16.06.2020 it is observed that the CPIO had uploaded the RTI application of the applicant in the “Reply of Appeal†box instead of uploading the reply dated 16.06.2020 and the same has been regretted by him. A copy of the reply dated 16.06.2020 given by Sh C.Vinod Babu, CPIO is hereby enclosed for your information. No further intervention is required on the part of FAA in the matter. |
|