There are serious errors in your form submission, please see below for details.

Search RTI Appeal

List of RTI Appeal

SNo. Registration No Appellate Authority Name Received date Reply Appeal Reply Doc
761 CICOM/A/E/24/00017 Ms. ROOP AVTAR KAUR 12-01-2024 Ref RTI No. - CICOM/R/E/24/00014 GROUNDS FOR FIRST APPEAL: The Appellant submitted first appeal stating that "The CPIO Replied that It is informed that no complaint has been received vide diary number 657395/2022. However, vide this diary number our order CIC/BIBCL /A/2021/626910 has been uploaded. Therefore, you may please send your complaint petition specifying that you have not received reply from the respondent. However, the Complaint was filed online with portal of CIC in which there is option for choosing NON- COMPLIANCE also for option for CPIO reply received (Y/N)* and I specifically opted ‘NO’. Moreover, if my Complaint was not complete the same should be disposed off accordingly, however, the complaint is still subsists and I unable to file fresh as per advice in the reply of CPIO. Point no 3, CPIO should provide the specific provision Point no 4, There be some Rule in CIC and the same be provided" DECISION OF FIRST APPELLATE AUTHORITY: The First Appeal, RTI application and reply given by CPIO of CIC have been perused. As per Section 2(f) of the RTI Act, 2005 only such information as is available and existing and held by the public authority or is under control of the public authority can be provided by a PIO. The PIO is not supposed to create or collate information that is not a part of the record. Accordingly, the reply given by the CPIO is appropriate and as per the provisions of the RTI Act,2005. Hence, no intervention is required on behalf of the FAA in this matter. The appeal is disposed of accordingly. NA
762 CICOM/A/P/24/00009 Ms. ROOP AVTAR KAUR 11-01-2024 आर. टी. आई. आवेदन, प्रदान की गई सूचना एवं प्रथम अपील का अवलोकन करने पर पाया गया कि अपीलकर्ता के आर.टी.आई. आवेदन सं. CICOM/R/P/23/00670 में सूचना मांगी थी जिसके प्रतिउत्तर में केंद्रीय जन सूचना अधिकारी द्वारा प्रेषित की गई सूचना, सूचना का अधिकार अधिनियम के प्रावधानों एवं मांगी गई सूचना के अनुसार ही है। अपीलकर्ता को बिंदु संख्या 1 की सूचना श्रीमती सुमन बाला (DR to IC AR) द्वारा प्रदान कर दी गई है। परन्तु बिंदु सं 2 की सूचना श्री आर.के.राव (DR to IC VT) द्वारा नहीं दी गई है अतः केंद्रीय जन सूचना अधिकारी (श्री आर.के.राव (DR to IC VT) को निर्देश दिया जाता है कि इस आदेश के प्राप्ति के दस दिन के भीतर दिनांक 22.01.2024 तक आर.टी.आई. आवेदन सं. CICOM/R/P/23/00670 के तहत बिंदु संख्या 2 में मांगी गई सूचना का अवलोकन कर अपीलकर्ता को प्रेषित की जाये। NA
763 CICOM/A/P/24/00010 Ms. ROOP AVTAR KAUR 11-01-2024 Ref RTI No.- CICOM/R/P/23/00406 GROUNDS FOR FIRST APPEAL: The Appellant submitted first appeal stating that “I am to invite your kind attention towards my RTI application dated 27.07.2023 submitted to PIO CIC New Delhi and to say that the requisite information has not been provided by the PIO. Hence it is deemed refused. You are requested to take action under RTI Act and provide the information please." DECISION OF FIRST APPELLATE AUTHORITY: The First Appeal, RTI application and reply given by CPIO of CIC have been perused. In the instant case, the Appellant has submitted the first appeal after 30 days of receipt of reply of the CPIO i.e. reply dated 10.08.2023. The First Appeal was received in the O/o FAA, CIC on 11.01.2024 which is well beyond 30 days. Appellant has not specified anything which could be taken as sufficient cause for the appellant not filing the appeal in time. So, this appeal cannot be taken into consideration as the time limit for submission of first appeal has already exceeded. The appeal is not admitted as per Subsection (1) of Section 19 of the RTI Act, 2005. The appeal is disposed of accordingly. NA
764 CICOM/A/P/24/00011 Ms. ROOP AVTAR KAUR 11-01-2024 Ref RTI No.- CICOM/R/P/23/00644 GROUNDS FOR FIRST APPEAL: The Appellant submitted first appeal stating that “I am to invite your kind attention towards my RTI application dated 16.11.2023 submitted to PIO CIC New Delhi and to say that the requisite information has not been provided by the PIO. Hence it is deemed refused. You are requested to take action under RTI Act and provide the information please." DECISION OF FIRST APPELLATE AUTHORITY: The First Appeal, RTI application and reply given by CPIO of CIC have been perused. As per Section 2(f) of the RTI Act, 2005 only such information as is available and existing and held by the public authority or is under control of the public authority can be provided by a PIO. The PIO is not supposed to create or collate information that is not a part of the record. In the instant case, the CPIO(DR to IC-VT) has already replied to the RTI application on 03.01.2024 but as mentioned by the appellant in the first appeal of non-receipt of the reply, a copy of the RTI reply is being attached with this order. Accordingly, the reply given by the CPIO is appropriate and as per the provisions of the RTI Act, 2005. Hence, no intervention is required on behalf of the FAA in this matter. The appeal is disposed of accordingly. NA
765 CICOM/A/E/24/00015 Ms. ROOP AVTAR KAUR 10-01-2024 Ref RTI No. - CICOM/R/E/24/00015 GROUNDS FOR FIRST APPEAL: The Appellant submitted first appeal stating that "(1) The appellant is in receipt of the decision of the CPIO. (2) The appellant had asked for the certified copy of the document as per the DoP&T office memorandum number 10/1/2013-IR dated 06-Oct-2015, which states that: the PIO should endorse the document True copy of the document/record supplied under the RTI Act, sign the document with date, above a seal containing name of the officer, PIO and name of public authority. (3) The CPIO has not certified the document properly. The CPIO has not stamped the document with his/her official rubber seal. Hence, the information provided is incomplete. (4) Please order the CPIO to certify the documents completely and properly as per the aforementioned office memorandum. (5) Uploaded herewith is the incomplete certified copy of the document." DECISION OF FIRST APPELLATE AUTHORITY: The First Appeal, RTI application and reply given by CPIO of CIC have been perused. As per Section 2(f) of the RTI Act, 2005 only such information as is available and existing and held by the public authority or is under control of the public authority can be provided by a PIO. The PIO is not supposed to create or collate information that is not a part of the record. Accordingly, the reply given by the CPIO is appropriate and as per the provisions of the RTI Act,2005. Hence, no intervention is required on behalf of the FAA in this matter. The appeal is disposed of accordingly. NA
766 CICOM/A/E/24/00014 Ms. ROOP AVTAR KAUR 09-01-2024 Ref RTI No. - CICOM/R/E/23/01424 GROUNDS FOR FIRST APPEAL: The Appellant submitted first appeal stating that CPIO provided incomplete, misleading and false information. DECISION OF FIRST APPELLATE AUTHORITY: The First Appeal, RTI application and reply given by CPIO of CIC have been perused. As per Section 2(f) of the RTI Act, 2005 only such information as is available and existing and held by the public authority or is under control of the public authority can be provided by a PIO. The PIO is not supposed to create or collate information that is not a part of the record. In the instant case, the CPIO has already replied to the RTI application on 09.01.2024 by speed post and the copy is attached. Accordingly, the reply given by the CPIO is appropriate and as per the provisions of the RTI Act,2005. Hence, no intervention is required on behalf of the FAA in this matter. The appeal is disposed of accordingly. download pdf
767 CICOM/A/P/24/00008 Ms. ROOP AVTAR KAUR 09-01-2024 Ref RTI No.- CICOM/R/P/23/00318 GROUNDS FOR FIRST APPEAL: The Appellant submitted first appeal stating that “I am to invite your kind attention towards my RTI application dated 30.05.2023 submitted to PIO CIC New Delhi and to say that the requisite information has not been provided by the PIO. Hence it is deemed refused. You are requested to take action under RTI Act and provide the information please." DECISION OF FIRST APPELLATE AUTHORITY: The First Appeal, RTI application and reply given by CPIO of CIC have been perused. In the instant case, the Appellant has submitted the first appeal after 30 days of receipt of reply of the CPIO i.e. reply dated 10.08.2023. The First Appeal was received in the O/o FAA, CIC on 09.01.2024 which is well beyond 30 days. Appellant has not specified anything which could be taken as sufficient cause for the appellant not filing the appeal in time. So, this appeal cannot be taken into consideration as the time limit for submission of first appeal has already exceeded. The appeal is not admitted as per Subsection (1) of Section 19 of the RTI Act, 2005. The appeal is disposed of accordingly. NA
768 CICOM/A/P/24/00006 Ms. ROOP AVTAR KAUR 08-01-2024 Ref RTI No.- CICOM/R/P/23/00473 GROUNDS FOR FIRST APPEAL: The Appellant submitted first appeal stating that “I am to invite your kind attention towards my RTI application dated 25.08.2023 submitted to PIO CIC New Delhi and to say that the requisite information has not been provided by the PIO. Hence it is deemed refused. You are requested to take action under RTI Act and provide the information please." DECISION OF FIRST APPELLATE AUTHORITY: The First Appeal, RTI application and reply given by CPIO of CIC have been perused. In the instant case, the CPIO inadvertently replied to the RTI application on the RTI portal and didn’t send the reply to the appellant by speed post. CPIO(DR to IC-VT) is directed to revisit the RTI application as per the provisions of the RTI Act, 2005 and provide information to the appellant by 09.02.2024, free of cost. NA
769 CICOM/A/P/24/00007 Ms. ROOP AVTAR KAUR 08-01-2024 Ref RTI- CICOM/R/P/23/00314 GROUNDS FOR FIRST APPEAL: The Appellant submitted first appeal stating that “I am to invite your kind attention towards my RTI application dated 29.05.2023 submitted to PIO CIC New Delhi and to say that the requisite information has not been provided by the PIO. Hence it is deemed refused. You are requested to take action under RTI Act and provide the information please." DECISION OF FIRST APPELLATE AUTHORITY: The First Appeal, RTI application and reply given by CPIO of CIC have been perused. In the instant case, the Appellant has submitted the first appeal after 30 days of receipt of reply of the CPIO i.e. reply dated 10.08.2023. The First Appeal was received in the O/o FAA, CIC on 08.01.2024 which is well beyond 30 days. Appellant has not specified anything which could be taken as sufficient cause for the appellant not filing the appeal in time. So, this appeal cannot be taken into consideration as the time limit for submission of first appeal has already exceeded. The appeal is not admitted as per Subsection (1) of Section 19 of the RTI Act, 2005. The appeal is disposed of accordingly. NA
770 CICOM/A/P/24/00005 Ms. ROOP AVTAR KAUR 08-01-2024 आर. टी. आई. आवेदन, प्रदान की गई सूचना एवं प्रथम अपील का अवलोकन करने पर पाया गया कि अपीलकर्ता के आर.टी.आई. आवेदन सं. CICOM/R/P/23/00651 में सूचना मांगी थी जिसके प्रतिउत्तर में केंद्रीय जन सूचना अधिकारी द्वारा प्रेषित की गई सूचना, सूचना का अधिकार अधिनियम के प्रावधानों एवं मांगी गई सूचना के अनुसार ही है। अतः केंद्रीय जन सूचना अधिकारी द्वारा प्रदान की गई सूचना तथ्यात्मक है और इसमें प्रथम अपीलीय अधिकारी के हस्तक्षेप की कोई आवश्यकता नहीं है। NA