There are serious errors in your form submission, please see below for details.

Search RTI Appeal

List of RTI Appeal

SNo. Registration No Appellate Authority Name Received date Reply Appeal Reply Doc
771 CICOM/A/E/24/00013 Ms. ROOP AVTAR KAUR 08-01-2024 Ref RTI No. - CICOM/R/E/23/01357 GROUNDS FOR FIRST APPEAL: The Appellant submitted first appeal stating that "Sir/ Mam This is regarding the RTI filed with CIC. I have emailed rticell@cic.nic.in and drtoic8@cic.nic.in on Dec 21, 2023 to send a reply and to submit it online as well but still havent received a reply. I am an active party is the said case and i need 1. All the documents that were filed along with the RTI 2. All the replies/documents that were submitted by all the parties 3. The orders that were passed 4. All the documents in the file thanking you" DECISION OF FIRST APPELLATE AUTHORITY: The First Appeal, RTI application and reply given by CPIO of CIC have been perused. As per Section 2(f) of the RTI Act, 2005 only such information as is available and existing and held by the public authority or is under control of the public authority can be provided by a PIO. The PIO is not supposed to create or collate information that is not a part of the record. In the instant case, the CPIO has already replied to the RTI application on 08.01.2024, within the prescribed time limit as per the provisions of the RTI Act, 2005. Accordingly, the reply given by the CPIO is appropriate and as per the provisions of the RTI Act,2005. Hence, no intervention is required on behalf of the FAA in this matter. The appeal is disposed of accordingly. NA
772 CICOM/A/E/24/00012 Ms. ROOP AVTAR KAUR 07-01-2024 Ref RTI No.- CICOM/R/E/23/01253 GROUNDS FOR FIRST APPEAL: The Appellant submitted first appeal stating that CPIO refused access to information requested. DECISION OF FIRST APPELLATE AUTHORITY: The First Appeal, RTI application and reply given by CPIO of CIC have been perused. As per Section 2(f) of the RTI Act, 2005 only such information as is available and existing and held by the public authority or is under control of the public authority can be provided by a PIO. The PIO is not supposed to create or collate information that is not a part of the record. As per the Section 6(1) of the RTI Act, 2005, the applicant shall file information request with the concerned Public Authority which holds the information. Accordingly, the reply given by the CPIO is appropriate and as per the provisions of the RTI Act,2005. Hence, no intervention is required on behalf of the FAA in this matter. The appeal is disposed of accordingly. NA
773 CICOM/A/E/24/00011 Ms. ROOP AVTAR KAUR 07-01-2024 Ref RTI No. - CICOM/R/E/23/01242 GROUNDS FOR FIRST APPEAL: The Appellant submitted first appeal stating that "07/01/2024 सुचना अधिकार अधिनियम 2005 की धारा 19(1 )के तहत प्रथम अपील श्रीमान प्रथम अपीलीय अधिकारी (FAA) दिल्ली परिवहन मुख्यालय आई पी एस्टेट नई दिल्ली 110002 विषय सूचना अधिकार अधिनियम 2005 की धारा 19(1) के तहत प्रथम अपील श्रीमान जी मैं दिनांक 2 नवंबर 2023 को जन सूचना अधिकारी दिल्ली परिवहन निगमकुछ कुछ जानकारी चाहिए थी जो कि उन्होंने झूठी एवं भ्रमित करती हुई दी गई अतः मेरी आपसे प्रार्थना है कि मुझे आरटीआई एक्ट 2005 की धारा 7(1 )के तहत जानकारी सही-सही से दिलाने की कृपया करें एवं दोषी अधिकारियों पर आईटीआई एक्ट 2005 की धारा 19 (2) और 20 (2)के तहत उचित कार्रवाई नियम अनुसार करें " DECISION OF FIRST APPELLATE AUTHORITY: The First Appeal, RTI application and reply given by CPIO of CIC have been perused. The reply given by the CPIO is appropriate and as per the provisions of the RTI Act,2005. Hence, no intervention is required on behalf of the FAA in this matter. The appeal is disposed of accordingly. NA
774 CICOM/A/E/24/00009 Ms. ROOP AVTAR KAUR 05-01-2024 Ref RTI No. - CICOM/R/E/23/01394 GROUNDS FOR FIRST APPEAL: The Appellant submitted first appeal stating that "Respected Sir, Above said diary number was never generated when i submitted complaints, namely 654592" DECISION OF FIRST APPELLATE AUTHORITY: The First Appeal, RTI application and reply given by CPIO of CIC have been perused. The reply given by the CPIO is appropriate and as per the provisions of the RTI Act,2005. Hence, no intervention is required on behalf of the FAA in this matter. The appeal is disposed of accordingly. NA
775 CICOM/A/P/24/00004 Ms. ROOP AVTAR KAUR 05-01-2024 आर. टी. आई. आवेदन, प्रदान की गई सूचना एवं प्रथम अपील का अवलोकन करने पर पाया गया कि अपीलकर्ता के आर.टी.आई. आवेदन सं. CICOM/R/P/23/00581 में सूचना मांगी थी जिसके प्रतिउत्तर में केंद्रीय जन सूचना अधिकारी द्वारा प्रेषित की गई सूचना, सूचना का अधिकार अधिनियम के प्रावधानों एवं मांगी गई सूचना के अनुसार ही है। परन्तु अपीलकर्ता ने अपील के कहा की उसे बिंदु संख्या 1 की सूचना प्राप्त नहीं की गई है।जबकि केंद्रीय जन सूचना अधिकारी द्वारा पत्र दिनांक 27.10.2023 के द्वारा सूचना भेजी जा चुकी है। केंद्रीय जन सूचना अधिकारी द्वारा दी गई सूचना, दिनांक 27.10.2023 की प्रति, प्रथम अपील के आर्डर के साथ संलग्न की जा रही है I अतः केंद्रीय जन सूचना अधिकारी द्वारा प्रदान की गई सूचना तथ्यात्मक है और इसमें प्रथम अपीलीय अधिकारी के हस्तक्षेप की कोई आवश्यकता नहीं है। NA
776 CICOM/A/E/24/00008 Ms. ROOP AVTAR KAUR 05-01-2024 Ref RTI No. - CICOM/R/E/23/01418 GROUNDS FOR FIRST APPEAL: The Appellant submitted first appeal stating that "Respected Sir, the purpose of my RTI request for diary number 655939/2023 to provide pdf copies of documents submitted is because the case had been registered with file number against CPIO,DRDO whereas i had submitted complaint with above said diary number 655939 against CPIO, Department of Defence. so Kindly my RTI request be considered as my complaint against CPIO, Dept of Defence is registered as case against CPIO, DRDO which is not correct" DECISION OF FIRST APPELLATE AUTHORITY: The First Appeal, RTI application and reply given by CPIO of CIC have been perused. The reply given by the CPIO is appropriate and as per the provisions of the RTI Act,2005. Hence, no intervention is required on behalf of the FAA in this matter. The appeal is disposed of accordingly. NA
777 CICOM/A/E/24/00010 Ms. ROOP AVTAR KAUR 05-01-2024 Ref RTI No. - CICOM/R/E/23/01395 GROUNDS FOR FIRST APPEAL: The Appellant submitted first appeal stating that "...registered case with File No: CIC/DRADO/C/2023/654485 the reason for above request is because i did not receive any email Alert from CIC about registering the above said case." DECISION OF FIRST APPELLATE AUTHORITY: The First Appeal, RTI application and reply given by CPIO of CIC have been perused. The reply given by the CPIO is appropriate and as per the provisions of the RTI Act,2005. Hence, no intervention is required on behalf of the FAA in this matter. The appeal is disposed of accordingly. NA
778 CICOM/A/P/24/00003 Ms. ROOP AVTAR KAUR 04-01-2024 Ref RTI No.-CICOM/R/P/23/00661 DECISION OF FIRST APPELLATE AUTHORITY: The First Appeal, RTI application and reply given by CPIO of CIC have been perused. In the instant case, CPIO(Dak section) is directed to revisit the RTI application as per the provisions of the RTI Act, 2005 and provide information to the appellant by 23.01.2024. The appeal is disposed of accordingly. NA
779 CICOM/A/P/24/00002 Ms. ROOP AVTAR KAUR 04-01-2024 आर. टी. आई. आवेदन, प्रदान की गई सूचना एवं प्रथम अपील का अवलोकन करने पर पाया गया कि अपीलकर्ता के आर.टी.आई. आवेदन सं. CICOM/R/P/23/00653 में सूचना मांगी थी जिसके प्रतिउत्तर में केंद्रीय जन सूचना अधिकारी द्वारा प्रेषित की गई सूचना, सूचना का अधिकार अधिनियम के प्रावधानों एवं मांगी गई सूचना के अनुसार ही है। परन्तु आपने अपनी प्रथम अपील में यह कहा है कि अभी तक कोई सूचना प्राप्त नहीं कराई गई। जबकि केंद्रीय जन सूचना अधिकारी द्वारा पत्र दिनांक 04.01.2024 के द्वारा सूचना भेजी जा चुकी है। केंद्रीय जन सूचना अधिकारी द्वारा दी गई सूचना, दिनांक 04.01.2024 की प्रति, प्रथम अपील के आर्डर के साथ संलग्न की जा रही है I अतः केंद्रीय जन सूचना अधिकारी द्वारा प्रदान की गई सूचना तथ्यात्मक है और इसमें प्रथम अपीलीय अधिकारी के हस्तक्षेप की कोई आवश्यकता नहीं है। NA
780 CICOM/A/E/24/00007 Ms. ROOP AVTAR KAUR 04-01-2024 Ref RTI No.- CICOM/R/E/23/01132 GROUNDS FOR FIRST APPEAL: The Appellant submitted first appeal stating that CPIO provided incomplete, misleading or false information. DECISION OF FIRST APPELLATE AUTHORITY: The First Appeal, RTI application and reply given by CPIO of CIC have been perused. In the instant case, the Appellant has submitted the first appeal after 30 days of receipt of reply of the CPIO i.e. reply dated 02.11.2023. The First Appeal has been initiated by the appellant on 04.01.2024, which is well beyond 30 days. Appellant has not specified anything which could be taken as sufficient cause for the appellant not filing the appeal in time. So, this appeal cannot be taken into consideration as the time limit for submission of first appeal has already exceeded. The appeal is not admitted as per Subsection (1) of Section 19 of the RTI Act, 2005. The appeal is disposed of accordingly. NA