There are serious errors in your form submission, please see below for details.

Search RTI Appeal

List of RTI Appeal

SNo. Registration No Appellate Authority Name Received date Reply Appeal Reply Doc
1 CICOM/A/P/22/00063 AJITKUMAR VASANTRAO SONTAKKE 06-05-2022 प्रथम अपील का आधार अपीलकर्ता ने दिनांक 30/03/2022 को जन सूचना अधिकारी से 2 बिंदुओं पर सूचना मांगी थी। बिंदु संख्या 1 व 2 में सूचना उपलब्ध नहीं होने की बात की गई है। निर्णय आर. टी. आई. आवेदन, प्रदान की गई सूचना एवं प्रथम अपील का अवलोकन करने पर पाया गया कि अपीलकर्ता के आर.टी.आई. आवेदन सं. CICOM/R/P/22/00157 के प्रतिउत्तर में केंद्रीय जन सूचना अधिकारी द्वारा प्रेषित की गई सूचना, सूचना का अधिकार अधिनियम के प्रावधानों एवं मांगी गई सूचना के अनुसार ही है। उल्लेखनीय है कि सूचना अधिकार का अधिनियम की धारा 2 (च) के प्रावधानों के अनुसार एक जन सूचना अधिकारी केवल सम्बंधित लोक प्राधिकरण के रिकॉर्ड में एक सामग्री के रूप में उपलब्ध सूचना ही प्रदान कर सकता है। अतः केंद्रीय जन सूचना अधिकारी द्वारा प्रदान की गई सूचना तथ्यात्मक है और इसमें प्रथम अपीलीय अधिकारी के हस्तक्षेप की कोई आवश्यकता नहीं है। तद्नुसार अपील निस्‍तारित की जाती है। NA
2 CICOM/A/E/21/00258 AJITKUMAR VASANTRAO SONTAKKE 08-12-2021 Ref RTI No.- CICOM/R/E/21/00973 GROUNDS FOR FIRST APPEAL: The appellant has mentioned that CPIO has provided incomplete, misleading and false information for Point 1, 2, & 3 and requests for hearing so that witnesses in respect of Para 1 of Appellant’s submission/ground can dispose before FAA under Oath/affidavit that hearing was not done in the sequence as per cause list. DECISION OF FIRST APPELLATE AUTHORITY: The First Appeal petition, RTI application and reply given by CPIO of CIC have been perused. As per Section 2(f) of RTI Act, 2005 only such information as is available and existing and held by the public authority or is under control of the public authority can be provided by a PIO. The PIO is not supposed to create or collect information that is not a part of the record. He is also not required to interpret information or decision of CIC. In the instant case, the CPIO has already provided the information as available in the records. Accordingly, the grounds of first appeal – “There are two witnesses other than Appellant who were present during hearing and have noted with concern that the hearing was not done in the sequence as per cause list” seems to be irrelevant. CPIO can only provide the information which is available on records. In view of the above, the disposal of information cannot be changed based on any witness or oath/affidavit if at all submitted during the hearing before the First Appellate Authority, which was requested by the appellant in his first appeal. The submissions made by the appellant in his first appeal application are sufficient for consideration by the FAA to arrive at a decision. Accordingly, it was felt that the personal hearing as requested by appellant was not necessary. Accordingly, the reply given by the CPIO is appropriate and as per the provisions of the RTI Act, 2005. Hence, no intervention is required on behalf of the FAA in this matter. The appeal is disposed of accordingly. NA
3 CICOM/A/E/21/00259 AJITKUMAR VASANTRAO SONTAKKE 08-12-2021 Ref RTI No.- CICOM/R/E/21/01011 GROUNDS FOR FIRST APPEAL: The appellant has mentioned that CPIO has provided incomplete, misleading and false information for Point 2, 4, 5, 6, 7 & 8. DECISION OF FIRST APPELLATE AUTHORITY: The First Appeal petition, RTI application and reply given by CPIO of CIC have been perused. As per Section 2(f) of RTI Act, 2005 only such information as is available and existing and held by the public authority or is under control of the public authority can be provided by a PIO. The PIO is not supposed to create or collect information that is not a part of the record. He is also not required to interpret information or decision of CIC. Accordingly, the reply given by the CPIO is appropriate and as per the provisions of the RTI Act, 2005. Hence, no intervention is required on behalf of the FAA in this matter. The appeal is disposed off accordingly. NA
4 CICOM/A/E/21/00227 AJITKUMAR VASANTRAO SONTAKKE 22-10-2021 Ref: RTI No. CICOM/R/E/21/00936. GROUNDS FOR FIRST APPEAL: “Unsatisfied with the reply”, the Appellant submitted first appeal dated 22.10.2021 requesting information as mentioned in the RTI application. DECISION OF THE FIRST APPELLATE AUTHORITY: The First Appeal petition dated 22.10.2021, RTI application dated 04.10.2021 and reply given by CPIO (IC-NG) of CIC have been perused. As per Section 2(f) of RTI Act, 2005 only such information as is available and existing and held by the public authority or is under control of the public authority can be provided by a PIO. The PIO is not supposed to create or collect information that is not a part of the record. He is also not required to interpret information or decision of CIC. Accordingly, the reply given by the CPIO is appropriate and as per the provisions of the RTI Act, 2005. Hence, no intervention is required on behalf of the FAA in this matter. NA
5 CICOM/A/P/21/00095 AJITKUMAR VASANTRAO SONTAKKE 08-09-2021 आर. टी. आई. आवेदन, प्रदान की गई सूचना एवं प्रथम अपील का अवलोकन करने पर पाया गया कि अपीलकर्ता के आर.टी.आई. आवेदन सं. CICOM/R/P/21/00291 के प्रतिउत्तर में केंद्रीय जन सूचना अधिकारी (RTI Cell) द्वारा प्रेषित की गई सूचना, सूचना का अधिकार अधिनियम के प्रावधानों एवं मांगी गई सूचना के अनुसार ही है। उल्लेखनीय है कि सूचना अधिकार अधिकारी अधिनियम की धारा 2 (च) के प्रावधानों के अनुसार एक जन सूचना अधिकारी केवल सम्बंधित लोक प्राधिकरण के रिकॉर्ड में एक सामग्री के रूप में उपलब्ध सूचना ही प्रदान कर सकता है। अतः केंद्रीय जन सूचना अधिकारी द्वारा प्रदान की गई सूचना तथ्यात्मक है और इसमें प्रथम अपीलीय अधिकारी के हस्तक्षेप की कोई आवश्यकता नहीं है। NA
6 CICOM/A/E/21/00193 AJITKUMAR VASANTRAO SONTAKKE 30-08-2021 ऑनलाइन आर. टी. आई. आवेदन, प्रदान की गई सूचना एवं प्रथम अपील का अवलोकन करने पर पाया गया कि अपीलकर्ता के आर.टी.आई. आवेदन सं. CICOM/R/E/21/00665 के प्रतिउत्तर में केंद्रीय जन सूचना अधिकारी (Admin) द्वारा प्रेषित की गई सूचना, सूचना का अधिकार अधिनियम के प्रावधानों एवं मांगी गई सूचना के अनुसार ही है। अतः केंद्रीय जन सूचना अधिकारी द्वारा प्रदान की गई सूचना तथ्यात्मक है और इसमें प्रथम अपीलीय अधिकारी के हस्तक्षेप की कोई आवश्यकता नहीं है। प्रथम अपील में उल्लेखित अन्य मदें जो कि RTI आवेदन का हिस्सा नहीं है, तथा उस पर प्रथम अपीलीय अधिकारी द्वारा कोई कार्यवाही अपेक्षित नहीं है। NA
7 CICOM/A/E/21/00188 AJITKUMAR VASANTRAO SONTAKKE 23-08-2021 Ref: RTI No. CICOM/R/E/21/00656 dated 15.07.2021. GROUNDS FOR FIRST APPEAL: The appellant has requested to provide information on all the points on the grounds that similar information for the period April 2019 to July 2020 was provided in Application no.CICOM/R/E/20/00589. DECISION OF FIRST APPELLATE AUTHORITY: Points-1,2,3,6&7: All the decisions on Appeals/Complaints are published in CIC’s website. Once information has been provided in public domain and on the website, the information is no longer held by or under the control of any public authority and hence, is no longer accessible as ‘right to information’. Point-4: CPIO (CR-II) is directed to provide the information, as is available in the records, by 29.09.2021. However, CPIO is not supposed to create or collect information that is not a part of the record. He/She is also not required to interpret information or decision of CIC. Point-5: Since this information is not compiled by the Commission, no intervention is required on behalf of FAA in this matter. NA
8 CICOM/A/E/21/00171 AJITKUMAR VASANTRAO SONTAKKE 29-07-2021 FIRST APPEAL NO.CICOM/A/21/00171 I. BRIEF OF THE CASE: The applicant sought information on 9 points vide RTI request No. CICOM/R/E/21/00601 dated 02.07.2021. The instant first appeal is in respect of Points-6,8&9. Point-6 related to action taken b NA
9 CICOM/A/E/21/00148 AJITKUMAR VASANTRAO SONTAKKE 20-07-2021 Grounds for First Appeal: The appellant has submitted that reply to Q.1 is contradictory. Replies to all questions (Q1-Q5) are informative but can be supported by evidences such as relevant judgements, office orders, Minutes of Meeting, if any. DECISION OF FIRST APPELLATE AUTHORITY: The First Appeal petition, RTI application and reply given by the CPIO-CIC have been perused. RTI Act, RTI rules and OMs issued by DoPT and Judgements relating to RTI are uploaded on the website of CIC. The appellant may note that once information has been provided in public domain and on the website, the information is no longer held by or under the control of any public authority and hence, is no longer accessible as ‘right to information’. The reply of the CPIO-CIC is appropriate and as per the provisions of the RTI Act 2005. Therefore, no intervention is required on behalf of the FAA in this matter. The appeal is being disposed of accordingly. NA
10 CICOM/A/P/21/00067 AJITKUMAR VASANTRAO SONTAKKE 12-07-2021 Please see the file. download pdf