There are serious errors in your form submission, please see below for details.

Search RTI Appeal

List of RTI Appeal

SNo. Registration No Appellate Authority Name Received date Reply Appeal Reply Doc
1171 CICOM/A/2018/00137 AJITKUMAR VASANTRAO SONTAKKE 06-06-2018 please see the file download pdf
1172 CICOM/A/2018/60070 AJITKUMAR VASANTRAO SONTAKKE 06-06-2018 In the RTI application, appellant has sought certified copy of the proof of dispatch of the Notice of Hearing in case File No.CIC/MOEAF/A/2016/298594. Shri S.C. Sharma, CPIO vide letter dated has responded that “As per the CIC website (copy enclosed), the notice was sent to the CPIO by speed post. The Bar code is: ED369372543IN.” In the appeal, the appellant has stated that documents provided by the CPIO are not properly certified. The CPIO should have provided true copy of the documents as per DoPT OM No.10/1/2013-IR dated 06.10.2015. In this regard, it is to mention that the CPIO has provided desired document as downloaded from the CIC’s website, which is already available in public domain. The CPIO can provide true copy of those documents, which are available on his record. Therefore, there is no infirmity in the reply of the CPIO. Hence, no action is required on the part of the FAA. NA
1173 CICOM/A/2018/60069 AJITKUMAR VASANTRAO SONTAKKE 05-06-2018 At point-4 of the appeal, appellant has stated that:- “Through this appeal, I am not approaching the FAA for a decision on CPIO reply but a sincere request to apprise the top most authority on RTI i.e. CIC himself about the sentiments of the citizen about the eroding values of the commission in the public eye.” On perusal of the RTI application and reply thereof by CPIO, it is observed that reply of the CPIO is appropriate. Since the appellant is not aggrieved with the CPIO’s reply, no action is required on the part of the FAA. NA
1174 CICOM/A/2018/60068 R K SINGH 04-06-2018 please see the file download pdf
1175 CICOM/A/2018/00134 R K SINGH 29-05-2018 Please see attachment. download pdf
1176 CICOM/A/2018/00133 AJITKUMAR VASANTRAO SONTAKKE 29-05-2018 Please see attachment. download pdf
1177 CICOM/A/2018/00135 AJITKUMAR VASANTRAO SONTAKKE 29-05-2018 Please see attachment. download pdf
1178 CICOM/A/2018/60067 AJITKUMAR VASANTRAO SONTAKKE 26-05-2018 In the RTI application, appellant has sought certified copy of reply of the CPIO in case No.CIC/MOEAF/A/2016/298594. Shri S.C. Sharma, CPIO & DO to Chief IC vide letter dated provided certified copy of reply of the CPIO, as available in the above case file. In the appeal, appellant has stated that documents provided by the CPIO are not properly certified, hence the information provided is incomplete. The appellant attached copy of DoPT OM No.10/1/2013-IR dated 06.10.2015 and requested to direct CPIO to provide the desired document w.r.t. above said DoPT OM. Para-2 of said DoPT OM states that:- “…….. wherever the applicant has requested for ‘certified copies’ of the documents or records, the CPIO should endorse on the document “True copy of the document/record supplied under RTI Act”, sign the document with date, above a seal containing name of the officer, CPIO and name of public authority………” In view of the above, direction is given to Shri S.C. Sharma, CPIO cum DO to Chief IC to provide desired copy of documents, as per specimen given in the above mentioned DoPT OM (copy enclosed) to the appellant within 2 weeks from the date of receipt of the order. NA
1179 CICOM/A/2018/00127 R K SINGH 24-05-2018 please see the file download pdf
1180 CICOM/A/2018/00128 AJITKUMAR VASANTRAO SONTAKKE 24-05-2018 please see the file download pdf