| SNo. |
Registration No |
Appellate Authority Name |
Received date |
Reply Appeal |
Reply Doc |
| 1281 |
CICOM/A/2018/60024 |
R K SINGH |
27-02-2018 |
In the RTI application, the appellant has sought attested physical or digital copy of case file Nos.CIC/DS/A/2011/003905/RM, CIC/RM/A/2013/000337, CIC/RM/C/2014/ 000022/SA, CIC/RM/A/2014/001370/SA, CIC/RM/C/2014/ 000355/SA and also sought attested copy of |
NA |
| 1282 |
CICOM/A/2018/60023 |
R K SINGH |
27-02-2018 |
please see the file |
 |
| 1283 |
CICOM/A/2018/00051 |
R K SINGH |
22-02-2018 |
please see the file |
|
| 1284 |
CICOM/A/2018/00053 |
R K SINGH |
22-02-2018 |
please see the file |
|
| 1285 |
CICOM/A/2018/00052 |
R K SINGH |
22-02-2018 |
please see the file |
|
| 1286 |
CICOM/A/2018/60021 |
R K SINGH |
22-02-2018 |
In the appeal, the appellant has stated that he has received multiple incomplete and misleading replies from different CPIOs of CIC in response to his online RTI application. He also stated that few replies contained point based information but could not |
NA |
| 1287 |
CICOM/A/2018/60022 |
R K SINGH |
22-02-2018 |
In the appeal, the appellant has stated that the CPIO has given incomplete and misleading information on Point-1. The CPIO has not given information on Points 2 to 6 of the RTI application.
On perusal of the case file, it is observed that information re |
NA |
| 1288 |
CICOM/A/2018/00049 |
R K SINGH |
20-02-2018 |
This appeal has been registered inadvertently against the RTI application of Shri Yogesh though the appeal filed by Shri Balwan Singh. Hence, this appeal may be treated as cancelled. |
NA |
| 1289 |
CICOM/A/2018/00050 |
R K SINGH |
20-02-2018 |
please see the file |
|
| 1290 |
CICOM/A/2018/00045 |
R K SINGH |
19-02-2018 |
please see the file |
|