There are serious errors in your form submission, please see below for details.

Search RTI Appeal

List of RTI Appeal

SNo. Registration No Appellate Authority Name Received date Reply Appeal Reply Doc
951 CICOM/A/2018/00255 AJITKUMAR VASANTRAO SONTAKKE 22-11-2018 please see the file download pdf
952 CICOM/A/2018/00256 AJITKUMAR VASANTRAO SONTAKKE 22-11-2018 please see the file download pdf
953 CICOM/A/2018/60177 AJITKUMAR VASANTRAO SONTAKKE 21-11-2018 In the RTI application, appellant has sought current status of 22 diary numbers. Shri Krishan Avtar Talwar, CPIO & DR to CR-I has provided the status of all diary numbers vide letter dated 11.10.2018. According to Shri Talwar, all diary numbers have been registered as 2nd Appeals in the Commission and providing present status of these appeals, he has transferred the RTI application to Shri S.S. Rohilla, CPIO & DO to CIC(SB). In the appeal, appellant has stated that part information is provided and remaining information is not provided so far. On perusal of the record of the case file, it is observed that Shri S.S. Rohilla, CPIO & DO to CIC(SB) has already furnished information vide his online reply dated 18.10.2018. Hence, the allegation of the appellant that remaining information has not been provided is not correct. Shri S.S. Rohilla, CPIO & DO to CIC(SB) in his online reply dated 18.10.2018 stated that:- “………In this regard additional information is as under:- Your second appeals/complaints are taken up for hearing in their own turn. The appeals/complaints are taken up for hearing in their own turn. The Commission endeavors to dispose the appeals/complaints as soon as possible but due to large number of intake, a longer time for their disposal is required. These are disposed on the basis of first come first served. In the Registry of Shri Sudhir Bhargava, Information Commissioner, the appeals/complaints which were registered in August 2017 are being heard in October 2018. Any further information relating to your appeal as mentioned above can also be obtain from the website of the Commission i.e. http://cic.gov.in/” Since complete and factual information has been provided by the CPIOs, no further intervention is required on the part of the FAA, in the matter. NA
954 CICOM/A/2018/00252 AJITKUMAR VASANTRAO SONTAKKE 19-11-2018 please see the file download pdf
955 CICOM/A/2018/00253 AJITKUMAR VASANTRAO SONTAKKE 19-11-2018 please see the file download pdf
956 CICOM/A/2018/00254 AJITKUMAR VASANTRAO SONTAKKE 19-11-2018 please see the file download pdf
957 CICOM/A/2018/60175 AJITKUMAR VASANTRAO SONTAKKE 17-11-2018 please see the file download pdf
958 CICOM/A/2018/60174 AJITKUMAR VASANTRAO SONTAKKE 17-11-2018 please see the file download pdf
959 CICOM/A/2018/60176 AJITKUMAR VASANTRAO SONTAKKE 17-11-2018 please see the file download pdf
960 CICOM/A/2018/60173 AJITKUMAR VASANTRAO SONTAKKE 16-11-2018 In the RTI application, appellant has stated that:- “With reference to the case no CIC/CCAKP/A/2018/144420 dated 16/7/2018 and diary no 161752 dated 10/10/12018. Kindly provide the urgent required details in above RTI filed 3 months before.” Shri K.L. Das, CPIO & DO to IC(BJ) vide letter dated15.11.2018 has provided a copy of the RTI application dated 29.03.2018 as sought in the RTI application. Now in the appeal, appellant has stated that:- “Under section 7(1) and 2(F)(12) of RTI Act 2005 the information on the proceedings is sought regarding the case No.CIC/CCAKP/A/2018/144420 through various RTIs. However there had been no information on the investigation of the said particular case in last 7 months. Kindly provide me the certified copies of the findings, investigations and replies of the TEP respondents in the said case.” The matter has been enquired with Shri K.L. Das, CPIO & DO to IC(BJ) who informed that the appellant’s above mentioned 2nd appeal was registered on 17.07.2018 and it will be listed for hearing in its own turn. But it seems that appellant wants to know the details of action taken on his complaint etc filed in the concerned public authority by him. The information sought is not available with the registry of IC(BJ) and matter will come in light only during hearing of the case. Since factual information has been provided by the CPIO, no intervention is required on the part of the FAA, in the matter. NA