There are serious errors in your form submission, please see below for details.

Search RTI Appeal

List of RTI Appeal

SNo. Registration No Appellate Authority Name Received date Reply Appeal Reply Doc
961 CICOM/A/2018/00251 AJITKUMAR VASANTRAO SONTAKKE 15-11-2018 please see the file download pdf
962 CICOM/A/2018/60171 AJITKUMAR VASANTRAO SONTAKKE 12-11-2018 please see the file download pdf
963 CICOM/A/2018/60172 AJITKUMAR VASANTRAO SONTAKKE 12-11-2018 please see the file download pdf
964 CICOM/A/2018/60170 AJITKUMAR VASANTRAO SONTAKKE 11-11-2018 please see the file download pdf
965 CICOM/A/2018/60168 AJITKUMAR VASANTRAO SONTAKKE 10-11-2018 On perusal of the RTI application, CPIO’s reply and submissions made in the appeal, it is observed that information provided by the CPIO is appropriate, therefore, no intervention is required on the part of the FAA. NA
966 CICOM/A/2018/60169 AJITKUMAR VASANTRAO SONTAKKE 10-11-2018 On perusal of the RTI application, CPIO’s reply and submissions made in the appeal, it is observed that information provided by the CPIO is appropriate, therefore, no intervention is required on the part of the FAA. NA
967 CICOM/A/2018/00250 AJITKUMAR VASANTRAO SONTAKKE 09-11-2018 please see the file download pdf
968 CICOM/A/2018/60167 AJITKUMAR VASANTRAO SONTAKKE 08-11-2018 On perusal of the RTI application, reply of the CPIO and submissions made in the appeal, it is observed that information provided by the CPIO on Point-1 is incomplete in light of Pilot Transparency Audit. Direction is hereby given to Shri Kishore Kumar Pukhral, CPIO (Legal Cell) to revisit Point-1 of the RTI application and provide appropriate information to the appellant within 1 week from the date of receipt of the order. As regards Point-2 is concerned, RTI Act is already in public domain. It is also available in CIC website link https://cic.gov.in/sites/default/files/ RTI-Act_English.pdf and CPIO is not obliged to make any comment, give advice or opinion, therefore, no intervention is required on the part of the FAA, on this point. NA
969 CICOM/A/2018/60165 AJITKUMAR VASANTRAO SONTAKKE 06-11-2018 In response to RTI application, Shri T.K. Mohapatra, CPIO & DR to IC(SA) vide his online reply dated 28.09.2018 stated that “No information has been sought in the RTI Application. It seems that you want action taken in respect of your letter dated 12-01-2018 (diary no.609599) on the compliance of the order of the Commission. The said letter is pending in the concerned case file for necessary action (if any).” The appellant was contacted over his given mobile number who informed that CIC’s decision No.CIC/MLABE/A/2017/131099 dated 20.12.2017 has not been complied with by the respondent CPIO for which he has submitted a petition dated 12.01.2018 (Dy.No.609599 dt. 13.01.2018). It was explained to the appellant that the CPIO in his reply has informed that the said letter is pending for necessary action, if any. Therefore, information furnished by the CPIO is factual. However, direction is given to Shri T.K. Mohapatra, CPIO & DR to IC(SA) to intimate latest status of the said petition to the appellant within 2 weeks from the date of receipt of this order. NA
970 CICOM/A/2018/60166 AJITKUMAR VASANTRAO SONTAKKE 06-11-2018 On perusal of the RTI application, CPIO’s reply and submissions made in the appeal, it is observed that information provided by the CPIO is appropriate, therefore, no intervention is required on the part of the FAA. NA