There are serious errors in your form submission, please see below for details.

Search RTI Appeal

List of RTI Appeal

SNo. Registration No Appellate Authority Name Received date Reply Appeal Reply Doc
1641 CICOM/A/E/22/00179 Ms. ROOP AVTAR KAUR 06-07-2022 Ref RTI No.- CICOM/R/E/22/00471 GROUNDS FOR FIRST APPEAL: The Appellant submitted first appeal stating that: This appeal is filed in CICOM/R/E/22/00471 on following GROUNDS 1. Because no response from CPIO u/s 7(1) within the time prescribed 2. Because the system followed in CIC of assigning old records to the succeeding Information Commissioners subject is illogical, inefficient and deliberately designed to ensure a system of total anarchy in record keeping so that information is not provided and applicants are harassed by having to inspect the badly maintained records of CIC. 3. Because the information of points 1 through 9 relate to the records of erstwhile Central Information Commissioner, Shri Shailesh Gandhi, and these need to be traced out and provided to me. PRAYERS 1. Opportunity of personal hearing be granted before any order is passed. 2. Because of the gross delay, all information requested be directed to be provided to me FREE OF COST in hard copy format only. NB: I am not willing to accept information by way of inspection but am seeking it in hard copy form only. 3. Disciplinary action under service rules be initiated against the errant CPIO(s). 4. That further first appeal be provided to me as an when the information is received or not received. DECISION OF THE FIRST APPELLATE AUTHORITY: The First Appeal, RTI application and reply given by CPIO of CIC have been perused. The opportunity of written submission, for the first appeal, provided to the appellant is found to be reasonable opportunity of hearing. The written submissions made by the appellant in his first appeal application are found to be sufficient for consideration by the FAA to arrive at a decision under the RTI Act, 2005. Accordingly, it was felt that the personal hearing as requested by appellant was not necessary. CPIO (DR to IC-UM) is directed to reply to the RTI application by 08.08.2022, free of cost and is also directed to reply to all the RTI applications in future, within the prescribed time limit as per the RTI Act, 2005 The appeal is disposed of accordingly. NA
1642 CICOM/A/E/22/00178 Ms. ROOP AVTAR KAUR 06-07-2022 Ref RTI No.- CICOM/R/E/22/00468 GROUNDS FOR FIRST APPEAL: The Appellant submitted first appeal stating that: This appeal is filed in CICOM/R/E/22/00468 on following GROUNDS 1. Because no response from CPIO u/s 7(1) within the time prescribed PRAYERS 1. Opportunity of personal hearing be granted before any order is passed. 2. Because of the gross delay, all information requested be directed to be provided to me FREE OF COST in hard copy format only. NB: I am not willing to accept information by way of inspection but am seeking it in hard copy form. 3. Disciplinary action under service rules be initiated against the errant CPIO. 4. That further first appeal be provided to me as an when the information is received or not received. DECISION OF THE FIRST APPELLATE AUTHORITY: The First Appeal, RTI application and reply given by CPIO of CIC have been perused. The opportunity of written submission, for the first appeal, provided to the appellant is found to be reasonable opportunity of hearing. The written submissions made by the appellant in his first appeal application are found to be sufficient for consideration by the FAA to arrive at a decision under the RTI Act, 2005. Accordingly, it was felt that the personal hearing as requested by appellant was not necessary. As per Section 2(f) of the RTI Act, 2005 only such information as is available and existing and held by the public authority or is under control of the public authority can be provided by a PIO. The PIO is not supposed to create or collate information that is not a part of the record. Accordingly, the reply given by the CPIO is appropriate and as per the provisions of the RTI Act, 2005. In future, CPIO (DS-GA) is directed to reply to the RTI applications within the prescribed time limit as per the RTI Act, 2005 The appeal is disposed of accordingly. NA
1643 CICOM/A/P/22/00100 Ms. ROOP AVTAR KAUR 05-07-2022 Reference RTI No.CICOM/R/P/22/00256 प्रथम अपील का आधार अपीलकर्ता द्वारा CPIO (DR to IC-VN) के पत्र संख्या CICOM/R/P/00256 दिनांक 15-06-2022 के माध्यम से प्राप्त सूचनाओं से असंतुष्ट होकर, सूचना के अधिकार अधिनियम 2005 की धारा 19 (1) के अंतर्गत प्रथम अपील दाखिल की गई है। निर्णय संबंधित संचिका (प्रथम अपील आवेदन एवं आर.टी.आई. आवेदन) का अवलोकन करने पर पाया गया कि अपीलकर्ता के आर.टी.आई. आवेदन सं. CICOM/R/P/22/00256 के प्रतिउत्तर में केंद्रीय जन सूचना अधिकारी (DR to IC-VN) द्वारा प्रदान की गई सूचना, सूचना के अधिकार अधिनियम के प्रावधानों के अनुसार सही है। उल्लेखनीय है कि सूचना अधिकार के अधिनियम की धारा 2 (च) के प्रावधानों के अनुसार एक जन सूचना अधिकारी केवल सम्बंधित लोक प्राधिकरण के रिकॉर्ड में एक सामग्री के रूप में उपलब्ध सूचना ही प्रदान कर सकता है। अतः केंद्रीय जन सूचना अधिकारी (DR to IC-VN) द्वारा प्रदान की गई सूचना तथ्यात्मक है और इसमें प्रथम अपीलीय अधिकारी के हस्तक्षेप की कोई आवश्यकता नहीं है। तद्नुसार अपील निस्‍तारित की जाती है। NA
1644 CICOM/A/P/22/00101 Ms. ROOP AVTAR KAUR 05-07-2022 Reference RTI No.CICOM/R/P/22/00257 III प्रथम अपील का आधार अपीलकर्ता द्वारा CPIO (DR to IC-VN) के पत्र संख्या CICOM/R/P/00257 दिनांक 15-06-2022 के माध्यम से प्राप्त सूचनाओं से असंतुष्ट होकर, सूचना के अधिकार अधिनियम 2005 की धारा 19 (1) के अंतर्गत प्रथम अपील दाखिल की गई है। निर्णय संबंधित संचिका (प्रथम अपील आवेदन एवं आर.टी.आई. आवेदन) का अवलोकन करने पर पाया गया कि अपीलकर्ता के आर.टी.आई. आवेदन सं. CICOM/R/P/22/00257 के प्रतिउत्तर में केंद्रीय जन सूचना अधिकारी (DR to IC-VN) द्वारा प्रदान की गई सूचना, सूचना के अधिकार अधिनियम के प्रावधानों के अनुसार सही है। उल्लेखनीय है कि सूचना अधिकार के अधिनियम की धारा 2 (च) के प्रावधानों के अनुसार एक जन सूचना अधिकारी केवल सम्बंधित लोक प्राधिकरण के रिकॉर्ड में एक सामग्री के रूप में उपलब्ध सूचना ही प्रदान कर सकता है। अतः केंद्रीय जन सूचना अधिकारी (DR to IC-VN) द्वारा प्रदान की गई सूचना तथ्यात्मक है और इसमें प्रथम अपीलीय अधिकारी के हस्तक्षेप की कोई आवश्यकता नहीं है। तद्नुसार अपील निस्‍तारित की जाती है। NA
1645 CICOM/A/P/22/00097 Ms. ROOP AVTAR KAUR 04-07-2022 Ref RTI No.- CICOM/R/P/22/00248 GROUNDS FOR FIRST APPEAL: The Appellant submitted the first appeal stating that appellant is unaware to find the concerned department as the applicant is an under trial prisoner and also prayed to kindly en-route the RTI application the concerned department. DECISION OF FIRST APPELLATE AUTHORITY: The First Appeal, RTI application and reply given by CPIO of CIC have been perused. As per Section 2(f) of the RTI Act, 2005 only such information as is available and existing and held by the public authority or is under control of the public authority can be provided by a PIO. The PIO is not supposed to create or collate information that is not a part of the record. Accordingly, the reply given by the CPIO is appropriate and as per the provisions of the RTI Act, 2005. Hence, no intervention is required on behalf of the FAA in this matter. The appeal is disposed of accordingly. NA
1646 CICOM/A/P/22/00098 Ms. ROOP AVTAR KAUR 04-07-2022 Ref RTI No.- CICOM/R/P/22/00249 GROUNDS FOR FIRST APPEAL: The Appellant submitted the first appeal stating that appellant is unaware to find the concerned department as the applicant is an under trial prisoner and also prayed to kindly en-route the RTI application the concerned department. DECISION OF FIRST APPELLATE AUTHORITY: The First Appeal, RTI application and reply given by CPIO of CIC have been perused. As per Section 2(f) of the RTI Act, 2005 only such information as is available and existing and held by the public authority or is under control of the public authority can be provided by a PIO. The PIO is not supposed to create or collate information that is not a part of the record. Accordingly, the reply given by the CPIO is appropriate and as per the provisions of the RTI Act, 2005. Hence, no intervention is required on behalf of the FAA in this matter. The appeal is disposed of accordingly. NA
1647 CICOM/A/P/22/00099 Ms. ROOP AVTAR KAUR 04-07-2022 Reference RTI No.CICOM/R/P/22/00255 प्रथम अपील का आधार अपीलकर्ता द्वारा CPIO (DR to IC-VN) के पत्र संख्या CICOM/R/P/00255 दिनांक 15-06-2022 के माध्यम से प्राप्त सूचनाओं से असंतुष्ट होकर, सूचना के अधिकार अधिनियम 2005 की धारा 19 (1) के अंतर्गत प्रथम अपील दाखिल की गई है। निर्णय संबंधित संचिका (प्रथम अपील आवेदन एवं आर.टी.आई. आवेदन) का अवलोकन करने पर पाया गया कि अपीलकर्ता के आर.टी.आई. आवेदन सं. CICOM/R/P/22/00255 के प्रतिउत्तर में केंद्रीय जन सूचना अधिकारी (DR to IC-VN) द्वारा प्रदान की गई सूचना, सूचना के अधिकार अधिनियम के प्रावधानों के अनुसार सही है। उल्लेखनीय है कि सूचना अधिकार के अधिनियम की धारा 2 (च) के प्रावधानों के अनुसार एक जन सूचना अधिकारी केवल सम्बंधित लोक प्राधिकरण के रिकॉर्ड में एक सामग्री के रूप में उपलब्ध सूचना ही प्रदान कर सकता है। अतः केंद्रीय जन सूचना अधिकारी (DR to IC-VN) द्वारा प्रदान की गई सूचना तथ्यात्मक है और इसमें प्रथम अपीलीय अधिकारी के हस्तक्षेप की कोई आवश्यकता नहीं है। तद्नुसार अपील निस्‍तारित की जाती है। NA
1648 CICOM/A/E/22/00174 Ms. ROOP AVTAR KAUR 04-07-2022 Ref RTI No.- CICOM/R/E/22/00393 GROUNDS FOR FIRST APPEAL: The Appellant submitted first appeal stating that: Sir, In query no. 2, I requested to provide, 2. Copy of the Submissions (written/ electronic- through CIC portal), if any, of the appellants i.e. Mr. Rishav Saha and Mr. Subrata Das, submitted to the CIC for the hearing of second appeals, between 1st March 2022 and 8th April 2022. However, the reply of the CPIO, CIC, does not contain any of the submissions of Rishav Saha and Subrata Das. Again, from the perusal of the reply of the CPIO, it is understood that both of them have not objected to provide copies of their submissions. In view of the above, I would like to request you to instruct the CPIO to provide copies of the submissions of RIshav Saha and Subrata Das. DECISION OF THE FIRST APPELLATE AUTHORITY: The First Appeal, RTI application and reply given by CPIO of CIC have been perused. In the instant case, the Appellant has submitted the first appeal after 30 days of receipt of reply of the CPIO i.e. reply dated 26.05.2022. The First Appeal has been initiated by the appellant on 04.07.2022, which is well beyond 30 days. Appellant has not specified anything which could be taken as sufficient cause for the appellant not filing the appeal in time. So, this appeal cannot be taken into consideration as the time limit for submission of first appeal has already exceeded. The appeal is not admitted as per Subsection (1) of Section 19 of the RTI Act, 2005. The appeal is disposed of accordingly. NA
1649 CICOM/A/E/22/00177 Ms. ROOP AVTAR KAUR 04-07-2022 Ref RTI no.- CICOM/R/E/22/00374 GROUNDS FOR FIRST APPEAL: The Appellant submitted first appeal stating that: Even after filing the non-compliance I have received no relief from the CIC. The PNB officials have not yet been punished. I am a second generation after my mother and its been 39 years, will I ever get justice in my life time or will the generations after me will also have to follow up. below is the detail of non-complaince filed two months ago. Dear Madam/Sir, Your dak request has been diarised in the Commission. Request details are given below: 3 Diary Number 625486 4 Diary Date 05-05-2022 5 Letter Date NA 6 DAK Assign To (Section/ Office Incharge) Compliance Cell We have recevied the Link Paper/Compliance/Non-Compliance. Your Diary no. is : 625486 Regards, Central Information Commission (CIC) DECISION OF THE FIRST APPELLATE AUTHORITY: The First Appeal, RTI application and reply given by CPIO of CIC have been perused. In the instant case, the Appellant has submitted the first appeal after 30 days of receipt of reply of the CPIO i.e. reply dated 02.05.2022. The First Appeal has been initiated by the appellant on 04.07.2022, which is well beyond 30 days. Appellant has not specified anything which could be taken as sufficient cause for the appellant not filing the appeal in time. So, this appeal cannot be taken into consideration as the time limit for submission of first appeal has already exceeded. The appeal is not admitted as per Subsection (1) of Section 19 of the RTI Act, 2005. The appeal is disposed of accordingly. NA
1650 CICOM/A/E/22/00176 Ms. ROOP AVTAR KAUR 04-07-2022 Ref RTI No.- CICOM/R/E/22/00612 GROUNDS FOR FIRST APPEAL: The Appellant submitted first appeal stating that: Sir I am sought an information about entired file no of diary no 627070 of 2022 date 15 may 022.But CPIO has been provided wrong file records in splite of written request alongwith receipt. Hence , Sir I am sough requested to you for current information through under section 19(1) of RTI act 2005 after hearing to parties through telephonic conference no 9835754480). I shall be everpray always to you for this kindness of act. Enclosed-An request alongwith documents. DECISION OF THE FIRST APPELLATE AUTHORITY: The First Appeal, RTI application and reply given by CPIO of CIC have been perused. Based on the grounds specified by the appellant in the First Appeal, CPIO (DR to CIC-YS) is directed to revisit the RTI application and provide the correct information related to File No. CIC/SCOFI/A/2022/627070, by 10.08.2022. The appeal is disposed of accordingly. NA