There are serious errors in your form submission, please see below for details.

Search RTI Appeal

List of RTI Appeal

SNo. Registration No Appellate Authority Name Received date Reply Appeal Reply Doc
1771 CICOM/A/E/22/00104 Ms. ROOP AVTAR KAUR 05-04-2022 Ref RTI- CICOM/R/E/22/00236 GROUNDS FOR FIRST APPEAL: The Appellant submitted first appeal stating that: “I am not satisfied at all from the information given by the pio to me I have asked specifically the questions which pertains to cic and their valid authorization and power under which they have issued stay order Specifically I need aswer either cic has power to issue stay order yes or no If cic has authority to issue stay order kindly quote me the act because under rti act cic has no such power to issue stay order or interim stay order. If any information commissioner gives arbitary decision where we can complaint either to chief information commissioner or any body exist there” DECISION OF THE FIRST APPELLATE AUTHORITY: The First Appeal petition, RTI application and reply given by CPIO of CIC have been perused. As per Section 2(f) of the RTI Act, 2005 only such information as is available and existing and held by the public authority or is under control of the public authority can be provided by a PIO. The PIO is not supposed to create or collect information that is not a part of the record. Accordingly, the reply given by the CPIO is appropriate and as per the provisions of the RTI Act, 2005. Hence, no intervention is required on behalf of the FAA in this matter. The appeal is disposed of accordingly. NA
1772 CICOM/A/E/22/00103 Ms. ROOP AVTAR KAUR 30-03-2022 Ref RTI No.- CICOM/R/E/22/00200 GROUNDS FOR FIRST APPEAL: The Appellant submitted first appeal stating that: Sir Please provide me information of particular section of RTI Act 2005 pertain to the citizen rights for knowing the information of status of his/her personal application which are submitted to any department of the Government. Kindly provide me such information of my rights to know the status of my personal application which are submitted to any department of the Government under RTI Act 2005. DECISION OF THE FIRST APPELLATE AUTHORITY: The First Appeal petition, RTI application and reply given by CPIO of CIC have been perused. As per Section 2(f) of the RTI Act, 2005 only such information as is available and existing and held by the public authority or is under control of the public authority can be provided by a PIO. The PIO is not supposed to create or collect information that is not a part of the record. Accordingly, the reply given by the CPIO is appropriate and as per the provisions of the RTI Act, 2005. Hence, no intervention is required on behalf of the FAA in this matter. The appeal is disposed of accordingly. NA
1773 CICOM/A/P/22/00034 Ms. ROOP AVTAR KAUR 28-03-2022 आर.टी.आई आवेदन, प्रदान की गई सूचना एवं प्रथम अपील आवेदन का अवलोकन करने पर पाया गया है कि केंद्रीय जन सूचना अधिकारी द्वारा दिनांक 04.01.2022 को सूचना प्रेषित की गई है एवं अपीलकर्ता द्वारा प्रथम अपील आवेदन दिनांक 17.03.2022 को प्रेषित किया गया है। सूचना का अधिकार अधिनियम, 2005 के तहत प्रथम अपील आवेदन सूचना प्राप्ति के 30 दिनों के भीतर ही दाखिल किया जाना अपेक्षित है। अपीलकर्ता द्वारा देर से प्रथम अपील दाखिल किये जाने का कोई कारण भी नहीं बताया गया है। अतः उक्त तथ्यों के आधार पर प्रथम अपील ख़ारिज की जाती है। NA
1774 CICOM/A/P/22/00036 Ms. ROOP AVTAR KAUR 28-03-2022 आर.टी.आई. आवेदन, प्रदान कि गई सूचना एवं प्रथम अपील का अवलोकन करने पर पाया गया कि अपीलकर्ता के आर.टी. आई. आवेदन सं CICOM/R/P/22/00017 के प्रतिउत्तर में केंद्रीय जन सूचना अधिकारी द्वारा सूचना का अधिकार अधिनियम के प्रावधानों के अनुसार आर.टी.आई. आवेदन ट्रांसफर किया है। अतः केंद्रीय जन सूचना अधिकारी द्वारा किया गया काम तथ्यात्मक है, और इसमें प्रथम अपीलीय अधिकारी के हस्तक्षेप कि कोई आवश्यकता नहीं है I NA
1775 CICOM/A/P/22/00033 Ms. ROOP AVTAR KAUR 28-03-2022 आर.टी.आई. आवेदन, प्रदान कि गई सूचना एवं प्रथम अपील का अवलोकन करने पर पाया गया कि अपीलकर्ता के आर.टी. आई. आवेदन सं CICOM/R/P/22/00033 के प्रतिउत्तर प्रदान की गई सूचना, सूचना का अधिकार अधिनियम, 2005 के प्रावधानों के अनुसार ही है। परन्तु केंद्रीय जन सूचना अधिकारी द्वारा प्रेषित कि गई सूचना ऑनलाइन दी गई है जबकि उसने आर.टी.आई ऑफलाइन की थी। अतः केंद्रीय जन सूचना अधिकारी को यह निर्देश दिए जाता है कि वह अपीलकर्ता को आर.टी.आई. आवेदन सं. CICOM/R/P/22/00033 तहत मांगी गई सूचना का अवलोकन कर अपीलकर्ता को पूर्ण एवं स्पष्ट सूचना(फ्री ऑफ कॉस्ट) ऑफलाइन प्रेषित की जाये। अतः केंद्रीय जन सूचना अधिकारी द्वारा प्रदान कि गई सूचना तथ्यात्मक है और इसमें प्रथम अपीलीय अधिकारी के हस्तक्षेप कि कोई आवश्यकता नहीं है I NA
1776 CICOM/A/P/22/00038 Ms. ROOP AVTAR KAUR 28-03-2022 Ref RTI No.- CICOM/R/P/22/00098 GROUNDS FOR FIRST APPEAL: The Appellant submitted the first appeal stating: 1. Decision of CIC dated 24-02-2020 was not implemented by Sh. R.P. Grover, Dy. Registrar of CIC, vide his office order No. CICOM/R/P/21/00098 dated 07-03-2022. Therefore, Sh. R.P. Grover, Dy. Registrar of CIC, should be punished u/s 20(1) of RTI Act 2005 and provide the correct information to the applicant as sought in RTI application dated 24-01-2018. Copy enclosed. 2. Award dated 28-10-1995 was not implemented by Sh. V.K. Rao, Labour Officer, Govt. of NCT of Delhi vide his office order no. 8(15)/RTI/SPIO/SD/19/6563 dated 6-3-2019 and by Shri R. P. Grover, Dy. Registrar of CIC vide his office order dated 7-3-2022. Therefore, implement the award dated 28-10-1995 and pay the salary arrear Rs. 68,34,915/- to the applicant under CCS Rule of the Govt. of India, 1972 and for compliance the award dated 28-10-1995 within 10 days from received of this appeal. All the documents are enclosed. Please consider. DECISION OF FIRST APPELLATE AUTHORITY: The First Appeal petition, RTI application and CPIO’s reply have been perused. As per Section 2(f) of RTI Act, 2005 only such information as is available and existing and held by the public authority or is under control of the public authority can be provided by a PIO. The PIO is not supposed to create or collect information that is not a part of the record. The grounds of appeal mentioned by the appellant are beyond the purview of the FAA under the RTI Act, 2005. Accordingly, the reply given by the CPIO is appropriate and as per the provisions of the RTI Act, 2005. Hence, no intervention is required on behalf of the FAA in this matter. The appeal is disposed of accordingly. NA
1777 CICOM/A/P/22/00039 Ms. ROOP AVTAR KAUR 28-03-2022 Ref RTI No.- CICOM/R/P/22/00062 GROUNDS FOR FIRST APPEAL: The Appellant submitted the first appeal stating: 1. Find my complaint of online status copy of record as per to CIC online updation further you are not found to any more record informations 2. Complainant has been understood about RTI covered of action. Hence, I want only how much runnover to solvent and furnishhness from DSCDRC, New Delhi 3. Although, Requisition of appellant to Authority while you have clearance of an taken appropriates for contender about get to count fee with compensation form CIC actions with few week. DECISION OF FIRST APPELLATE AUTHORITY: The First Appeal petition, RTI application and CPIO’s reply have been perused. As per Section 2(f) of the RTI Act, 2005 only such information as is available and existing and held by the public authority or is under control of the public authority can be provided by a PIO. The PIO is not supposed to create or collect information that is not a part of the record. The grounds of appeal mentioned by the appellant are beyond the purview of the FAA under the RTI Act, 2005. Accordingly, the reply given by the CPIO is appropriate and as per the provisions of the RTI Act, 2005. Hence, no intervention is required on behalf of the FAA in this matter. The appeal is disposed of accordingly. NA
1778 CICOM/A/P/22/00032 Ms. ROOP AVTAR KAUR 28-03-2022 Ref RTI No.- CICOM/R/P/22/00010 GROUNDS FOR FIRST APPEAL: The Appellant in the first appeal application has mentioned following point-wise grounds: For Part I - An affidavit to the Commission regarding the factual position of the availability of information by 31-8-2021 failing which the Commission may initiate penal action as per section 20(1) of the RTI Act, 2005. Copy of Commission’s Order will result in penalty. Kindly provide me attested copy of penal action initiated against the D. C. Jammu. More than 5 years have already lapsed. Part II & III - Kindly intimate me the action taken and present status of second appeal dated 31-12-2021 as per records on file because the Commission’s website is not fully updated so providing incomplete information. Part IV - Complete information received. Part V - This 5th part of my RTI application form dated 31.12.2021 is omitted by all the above mentioned CPIOs. Kindly provide me attested copies of action taken and present status of my second appeal submitted to the CIC, New Delhi on 25-8-2021. DECISION OF FIRST APPELLATE AUTHORITY: The First Appeal petition, RTI application and CPIO’s reply have been perused. For Part I – As per Section 2(f) of the RTI Act, 2005 only such information as is available and existing and held by the public authority or is under control of the public authority can be provided by a PIO. The PIO is not supposed to create or collect information that is not a part of the record. The grounds of appeal mentioned by the appellant are beyond the purview of the FAA under the RTI Act, 2005. Accordingly, the reply given by the CPIO is appropriate and as per the provisions of the RTI Act, 2005. Hence, no intervention is required on behalf of the FAA in this matter. For Part II & III – As per Section 2(f) of RTI Act, 2005 only such information as is available and existing and held by the public authority or is under control of the public authority can be provided by a PIO. The PIO is not supposed to create or collect information that is not a part of the record. Accordingly, the reply given by the CPIO is appropriate and as per the provisions of the RTI Act, 2005. Hence, no intervention is required on behalf of the FAA in this matter. For Part V – In the instant case, it is observed that CPIO RTI Cell has forwarded the RTI application for Part I to CPIO (DR to CIC) and for Part II to IV to CPIO CR-I. However, no reply has been furnished for Part V. Accordingly, CPIO (RTI Cell) is directed to revisit the RTI application and take appropriate action on the same by 11/04/2022 and arrange to provide reply as per provisions of the RTI Act, 2005, free of cost. The appeal is disposed of accordingly. NA
1779 CICOM/A/P/22/00035 Ms. ROOP AVTAR KAUR 28-03-2022 Ref RTI No.- CICOM/R/P/22/00080 GROUNDS FOR FIRST APPEAL: The Appellant in the first appeal application has prayed as follows: A) Immediately provide the true, correct, complete and accurate information of Query 4A to B to the appellant. B) Provide the information of Query 4A & B free of cost as per section 7(6) of RTI Act to the appellant. C) Issue a Circular/Order directing PIOs of CIC to mentioning the Official Mobile Number or Contact Number and E. Mail ID in replies/decisions in future correspondence in compliance to the OFFICE MEMORANDUM No. 10/01/2013-IR dated 06.10.2015 of DOPT, Govt. of India. D) Provide a token compensation of Rs. 200/- for the mental pain, agony, unnecessary financially loss and determent suffered to the appellant. E) Pass any other such further orders be also passed that this First Appellant Authority may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of appeal in favour of appellant and against the PIO/Respondent in the interest of justice, equity and good conscience. F) The appellant has also submitted an application for granting of hearing and issue of hearing notice to parties. DECISION OF FIRST APPELLATE AUTHORITY: The First Appeal petition, RTI application and CPIO’s reply have been perused. As per DoPT guidelines, it is not mandatory that FAA may conduct a physical hearing. The opportunity of written submission provided to the appellant is reasonable opportunity of hearing. The written submissions made by the appellant in his first appeal application are found to be sufficient for consideration by the FAA to arrive at a decision. Accordingly, it was felt that the personal hearing as requested by appellant was not necessary. Though the copy of file (electronic copy) is already provided by the CPIO(Admin Section) to the appellant which was requested by the appellant in Point 4A. CPIO(Admin Section) is directed to revisit the RTI application for Point 4B and provide opportunity for inspection of records on the day mutually agreed by the CPIO & Appellant, free of cost. The appeal is disposed of accordingly. NA
1780 CICOM/A/P/22/00037 Ms. ROOP AVTAR KAUR 28-03-2022 आर.टी.आई. आवेदन, प्रदान कि गई सूचना एवं प्रथम अपील का अवलोकन करने पर पाया गया कि अपीलकर्ता के आर.टी. आई. आवेदन सं CICOM/R/P/22/00037 के प्रतिउत्तर प्रदान की गई सूचना, सूचना का अधिकार अधिनियम, 2005 के प्रावधानों के अनुसार ही है। परन्तु केंद्रीय जन सूचना अधिकारी द्वारा प्रेषित कि गई सूचना ऑनलाइन दी गई है जबकि उसने आर.टी.आई ऑफलाइन की थी। अतः केंद्रीय जन सूचना अधिकारी को यह निर्देश दिए जाता है कि वह अपीलकर्ता को आर.टी.आई. आवेदन सं. CICOM/R/P/22/00051 तहत मांगी गई सूचना का अवलोकन कर 10 दिन के भीतर अपीलकर्ता को पूर्ण एवं स्पष्ट सूचना (फ्री ऑफ कॉस्ट) ऑफलाइन प्रेषित की जाये। अतः केंद्रीय जन सूचना अधिकारी द्वारा प्रदान कि गई सूचना तथ्यात्मक है और इसमें प्रथम अपीलीय अधिकारी के हस्तक्षेप कि कोई आवश्यकता नहीं है I NA