There are serious errors in your form submission, please see below for details.

Search RTI Appeal

List of RTI Appeal

SNo. Registration No Appellate Authority Name Received date Reply Appeal Reply Doc
1811 CICOM/A/E/22/00085 Ms. ROOP AVTAR KAUR 27-02-2022 आर. टी. आई. आवेदन, प्रदान की गई सूचना एवं प्रथम अपील का अवलोकन करने पर पाया गया कि अपीलकर्ता के आर.टी.आई. आवेदन सं. CICOM/R/E/22/00118 के बिंदु संख्या 1,2,3,4, एवं 5 के तहत प्रदान की गई सूचना, सूचना का अधिकार अधिनियम, 2005 के प्रावधानों के अनुसार ही है। परन्तु, केंद्रीय जन सूचना अधिकारी ने आर.टी.आई. आवेदन के बिंदु संख्या 6 के प्रतिउत्तर का उल्लेख नहीं किया है अतः केंद्रीय जन सूचना अधिकारी (RTI Cell) को यह निर्देश दिए जाता है कि वह अपीलकर्ता को आर.टी.आई. आवेदन सं. CICOM/R/E/22/00118 के बिंदु संख्या 6 के तहत मांगी गई सूचना का अवलोकन कर अपीलकर्ता को पूर्ण एवं स्पष्ट सूचना प्रेषित की जाये। NA
1812 CICOM/A/E/22/00084 Ms. ROOP AVTAR KAUR 24-02-2022 Ref RTI No.- CICOM/R/E/22/00159 GROUNDS FOR FIRST APPEAL: The Appellant submitted first appeal stating that the CPIO has provided incomplete, misleading and false information and mentions as follows:- 3.File Number. CIC/CBECE/A/2021/632749. 4.File Number. CIC/OCCPD/A/2021/634194. 5.File Number. CIC/CBECE/A/2021/634457. 6.File Number. CIC/DEPDD/A/2021/645305. DECISION OF THE FIRST APPELLATE AUTHORITY: The First Appeal petition, RTI application and reply given by CPIO of CIC have been perused. As per Section 2(f) of RTI Act, 2005 only such information as is available and existing and held by the public authority or is under control of the public authority can be provided by a PIO. The PIO is not supposed to create or collect information that is not a part of the record. In the instant case, the appellant has mentioned incorrect appeal no. for point no. 3 to 6 . Accordingly, the reply given by the CPIO is appropriate and as per the provisions of the RTI Act, 2005. Hence, no intervention is required on behalf of the FAA in this matter. The appeal is disposed of accordingly. NA
1813 CICOM/A/E/22/00083 Ms. ROOP AVTAR KAUR 23-02-2022 Ref RTI No.-CICOM/R/E/22/00029 GROUNDS FOR FIRST APPEAL: The Appellant submitted first appeal stating : The CPIO has refused to supply information by quoting an order of the High court but the said order is not applicable in the present case. I have demanded a copy of my own second appeal as I have misplaced it and need it for filing a writ petition in the High court. The demanded information does not fall under section 8 or 9 or the RTI act and further it is not third party information as I have demanded the records submitted by me. In view of the above, please direct the CPIO to supply information. DECISION OF THE FIRST APPELLATE AUTHORITY: The First Appeal petition, RTI application and reply given by CPIO of CIC have been perused. As per Section 2(f) of RTI Act, 2005 only such information as is available and existing and held by the public authority or is under control of the public authority can be provided by a PIO. Here, the Appellant himself has mentioned that the information pertains to him and has been misplaced by him because of which the Appellant has sought the information. CPIO didn’t mention any section for exemption from disclosure of information. Hence, the CPIO is directed to mention appropriate section of the RTI Act, 2005 for exemption from disclosure of information and reply the Appellant accordingly by 28/03/2022. The appeal is disposed of accordingly. NA
1814 CICOM/A/E/22/00081 Ms. ROOP AVTAR KAUR 23-02-2022 Ref RTI No.- CICOM/R/E/22/00055 GROUNDS FOR FIRST APPEAL: The Appellant submitted first appeal stating : The CPIO has refused to supply information by quoting an order of the High court but the said order is not applicable in the present case. I have demanded a copy of my own second appeal as I have misplaced it and need it for filing a writ petition in the High court. The demanded information does not fall under section 8 or 9 or the RTI act and further it is not third party information as I have demanded the records submitted by me. In view of the above, please direct the CPIO to supply information. DECISION OF THE FIRST APPELLATE AUTHORITY: The First Appeal petition, RTI application and reply given by CPIO of CIC have been perused. As per Section 2(f) of RTI Act, 2005 only such information as is available and existing and held by the public authority or is under control of the public authority can be provided by a PIO. Here, the Appellant himself has mentioned that the information pertains to him and has been misplaced by him because of which the Appellant has sought the information. CPIO didn’t mention any section for exemption from disclosure of information. Hence, the CPIO is directed to mention appropriate section of the RTI Act, 2005 for exemption from disclosure of information and reply the Appellant accordingly by 28/03/2022. The appeal is disposed of accordingly. NA
1815 CICOM/A/E/22/00082 Ms. ROOP AVTAR KAUR 23-02-2022 Ref RTI No.- CICOM/R/E/22/00049 GROUNDS FOR FIRST APPEAL: The Appellant submitted first appeal stating : The CPIO has refused to supply information by quoting an order of the High court but the said order is not applicable in the present case. I have demanded a copy of my own second appeal as I have misplaced it and need it for filing a writ petition in the High court. The demanded information does not fall under section 8 or 9 or the RTI act and further it is not third party information as I have demanded the records submitted by me and action taken on such records. In view of the above, please direct the CPIO to supply information. DECISION OF THE FIRST APPELLATE AUTHORITY: The First Appeal petition, RTI application and reply given by CPIO of CIC have been perused. As per Section 2(f) of RTI Act, 2005 only such information as is available and existing and held by the public authority or is under control of the public authority can be provided by a PIO. Here, the Appellant himself has mentioned that the information pertains to him and has been misplaced by him because of which the Appellant has sought the information. CPIO didn’t mention any section for exemption from disclosure of information. Hence, the CPIO is directed to mention appropriate section of the RTI Act, 2005 for exemption from disclosure of information and reply the Appellant accordingly by 28/03/2022. The appeal is disposed of accordingly. NA
1816 CICOM/A/E/22/00079 AJITKUMAR VASANTRAO SONTAKKE 20-02-2022 केंद्रीय जन सूचना अधिकारी ने आर.टी.आई आवेदन के बिंदु सं 1 के बारे में उपलब्ध सूचना, सूचना का अधिकार अधिनियम के अनुसार दे दी है। बिंदु सं 2 के लिए , जन सूचना अधिकारी ने संबंधित कोई भी रिकॉर्ड मेन्टेन नहीं होने के बारे में लिखा है। प्रथम अपील में अपीलकर्ता द्वारा वृहद जनहित के आधार पर केंद्रीय जन सूचना अधिकारी के जवाब को चुनौती दी है। यहाँ पर यह महत्वपूर्ण है की, जन सूचना अधिकारी वो ही सूचना प्रस्तुत कर सकता है जो उसके रिकॉर्ड में उपलब्ध है। अतः अपीलकर्ता ने वृहद जनहित के आधार पर किया हुआ निवेदन जन सूचना अधिकारी के सूचना उपलब्ध नहीं होने के कारण से मेल नहीं खता है। अतः ऑनलाइन आर. टी. आई. आवेदन, प्रदान की गई सूचना एवं प्रथम अपील का अवलोकन करने पर पाया गया कि अपीलकर्ता के आर.टी.आई. आवेदन सं. CICOM/R/E/22/00017 के प्रतिउत्तर में केंद्रीय जन सूचना अधिकारियों द्वारा प्रेषित की गई सूचना, सूचना का अधिकार अधिनियम के प्रावधानों एवं मांगी गई सूचना के अनुसार ही है। अतः केंद्रीय जन सूचना अधिकारी द्वारा प्रदान की गई सूचना तथ्यात्मक है और इसमें प्रथम अपीलीय अधिकारी के हस्तक्षेप की कोई आवश्यकता नहीं है। NA
1817 CICOM/A/E/22/00080 Ms. ROOP AVTAR KAUR 20-02-2022 Ref RTI No.- CICOM/R/T/22/00012 GROUNDS FOR FIRST APPEAL: The Appellant submitted first appeal stating : CICOM/R/E/22/00042 REQUEST FOR UPLOADING OF POINTWISE DISPOSAL OF THIS FIRST APPEAL WITH GROUNDS OF FIRST APPEAL, QUERY OF APPLICATION ON THE CIC WEBSITE RATHER THAN UPLOADING MEANINGLESS DECISIONS WITHOUT CITING QUERY,GROUNDS OF APPEAL VIOLATING SECTION 4(2) OF RTI ACT AS WELL AS DOPT CIRCULAR OF 2013,2019 FOR DISSEMINATION OF INFORMATION WITH CITIZENS TO MINIMIZE RTI USE As usual in this application like in all previous replies, learned CPIO sent reply by entirely hiding desired query Q-1 to 3 without showing my queries deliberately which will likely to be uploaded on the cic website in meaningless manner defeating section 4(2) of RTI Act as well as DoPT circulars of 2013, 2019 of uploading of queries with reply minimize rti use. This time again my reply has been sent by most delinquent CPIO of CIC without any jurisdiction without bothering to check the reply being sent by him. (1) Q-1, 2 no reply given by CPIO . Even this rti application reply making my Q-1,2 evidently clear of hiding queries of rti applications. FAA is requested to take disciplinary action against such CPIO badly affecting entire Indian citizens by deliberately sending fake , misleading information. (2) url given by CPIO is showing six months old rti replies. So none of my rti reply has been uploaded on cic website till date in the last two months as 8-august 2021 is the latest rti reply by CIC . (3) Q-3 FAA is requested to provide copy of complete queries with replies of CIC (rather than vague meaningless replies against section 4(2) , violating DoPT circular) (4) FAA is REQUESTED TO DISPLAY ALL RTI REPLIES IN REAL TIME LIKE DOPT WEBSITE HIDING NEITHER QUERY NOR FIRST APPEAL GROUNDS in view of suppressing last six months replies, first appeal decisions by cic . FAA as usual disposed first appeals without bothering to dispose pointwise in quasi-judicial manner OR by conducting hearing badly violating law in all previous first appeals. Now in this first appeal , FAA is requested to disclose my grounds of appeal in its uploaded first appeal decision on cic website with my name rather than entirely hiding APPLICANT NAME , grounds of appeal, queries of application as usual violating section 4(2) of RTI Act for minimizing rti use by citizens by dissemination of maximum information. DECISION OF THE FIRST APPELLATE AUTHORITY: The First Appeal petition, RTI application and reply given by CPIO of CIC have been perused. As per Section 2(f) of RTI Act, 2005 only such information as is available and existing and held by the public authority or is under control of the public authority can be provided by a PIO. The PIO is not supposed to create or collect information that is not a part of the record. In the instant case, the RTI was originally filed with DOPT with RTI No.- DOP&T/R/E/22/00502 dated 01/02/2022. It was transferred to CIC on 01/02/2022 with RTI No. - CICOM/R/T/22/00012 and disposed of by CPIO RTI Cell on 16/02/2022. Accordingly, the reply given by the CPIO is appropriate and as per the provisions of the RTI Act, 2005. Hence, no intervention is required on behalf of the FAA in this matter. The appeal is disposed of accordingly. NA
1818 CICOM/A/E/22/00078 Ms. ROOP AVTAR KAUR 20-02-2022 Ref RTI No.- CICOM/R/E/22/00086 GROUNDS FOR FIRST APPEAL: The Appellant submitted first appeal stating : THE FIRST APPEAL ALONG WITH THE COPIES OF THE RTI APPLICATION AND REPLY OF CPIO ARE ATTACHED FOR CONSIDERATION AND DECISION TO PROVIDE THE RELIEF REQUESTED. DECISION OF THE FIRST APPELLATE AUTHORITY: The First Appeal petition, RTI application and reply given by CPIO of CIC have been perused. As per Section 2(f) of RTI Act, 2005 only such information as is available and existing and held by the public authority or is under control of the public authority can be provided by a PIO. The PIO is not supposed to create or collect information that is not a part of the record. Accordingly, the reply given by the CPIO is appropriate and as per the provisions of the RTI Act, 2005. Hence, no intervention is required on behalf of the FAA in this matter. The appeal is disposed of accordingly. NA
1819 CICOM/A/P/22/00016 Ms. ROOP AVTAR KAUR 18-02-2022 Ref RTI No.- CICOM/R/P/21/00603 GROUNDS FOR FIRST APPEAL: The Appellant in the first appeal states that CPIO has not supplied clear particulars of documents and the cost of the certified documents has not been furnished by the CPIO and prays for the same. DECISION OF FIRST APPELLATE AUTHORITY: The First Appeal petition, RTI application and reply given by CPIO of CIC have been perused. In the instant case, the Appellant has submitted the first appeal after 30 days of receipt of reply of the CPIO i.e. reply dated 03.12.2021. Appellant has not specified anything which could be taken as sufficient cause for the appellant not filing the appeal in time. So, this appeal cannot be taken into consideration as the time limit for submission of first appeal has already exceeded. The appeal is rejected as per RTI Act, 2005. The appeal is disposed of accordingly. NA
1820 CICOM/A/P/22/00017 Ms. ROOP AVTAR KAUR 18-02-2022 आर. टी. आई. आवेदन, प्रदान की गई सूचना एवं प्रथम अपील का अवलोकन करने पर पाया गया कि अपीलकर्ता के आर.टी.आई. आवेदन सं. CICOM/R/P/21/00662 के प्रतिउत्तर में केंद्रीय जन सूचना अधिकारी द्वारा प्रेषित की गई सूचना, सूचना का अधिकार अधिनियम के प्रावधानों एवं मांगी गई सूचना के अनुसार ही है। उल्लेखनीय है कि सूचना अधिकार अधिकारी अधिनियम की धारा 2 (च) के प्रावधानों के अनुसार एक जन सूचना अधिकारी केवल सम्बंधित लोक प्राधिकरण के रिकॉर्ड में एक सामग्री के रूप में उपलब्ध सूचना ही प्रदान कर सकता है। अतः केंद्रीय जन सूचना अधिकारी द्वारा प्रदान की गई सूचना तथ्यात्मक है और इसमें प्रथम अपीलीय अधिकारी के हस्तक्षेप की कोई आवश्यकता नहीं है। NA