There are serious errors in your form submission, please see below for details.

Search RTI Appeal

List of RTI Appeal

SNo. Registration No Appellate Authority Name Received date Reply Appeal Reply Doc
1291 CICOM/A/E/23/00093 Ms. ROOP AVTAR KAUR 15-03-2023 Ref RTI No.- CICOM/R/T/23/00028/2 GROUNDS FOR FIRST APPEAL: The Appellant submitted first appeal stating that “Roop Avtar Kaur Additional Secretary 502 26162290/26175295(F) as-cic@nic.in https://cic.gov.in/cic-official-directory Till 12.59 pm today 15.03.2023 i have not responded with online VC link and forcing to visit public office for which public is not bound An appeal against DR to CIC(YS) - S K Chitkara who received online application on 03/03/2023 and partially disposing of on 15/03/2023 so he is just wasting public time without obliging his basic duties to improve delivery of public services, no longer call, email from CPIO then no longer he is bothering to write complete information of First Appellate authority and online status showing as follows: i have not sent any online video conferencing link so over e-mails no response, over call just not bothering to listen and making lame excuses and RTI online is also useless so what is duty of all these public servants who are abusing public, harassing with wasting public time Till now Y K Sinha, S K Chitkara, Suresh Kumar have not shared online video conferencing link or meeting id against CIC-PASOF-A-2022-616374 and hearing is on 15.03.2023 around 1.00 pm and still my emails, phone calls to 01126186535 have not considered and forcefully asking to visit DC/Public office even i can join from home/anywhere so it is duty of public servants to facilitate online VC rather to abuse, harass public by imposing self-made rules to mistreat public by going here, there even notice of hearing is not in official language Hindi then provided number 01633269392 is disabled not working, emails not being answered, PMPOG grievances dealt poorly and keeping pending it purposefully to write prabhjot singh gill is absent even public servants not obliging duties to facilitate online video conferencing Enter Registration Number CICOM/R/T/23/00028/2 Name Prabhjot Singh Gill Received Date 03/03/2023 Public Authority Central Information Commission Status REQUEST DISPOSED OF Date of action 15/03/2023 Reply :- Notice of hearing is sent to the Appellant and the CPIO to attend the hearing at the CIC office physically or through video conference at NIC studio for the Appellants and CPIOs based outside NCT of Delhi. No separate link is provided for the hearing. CPIO Details :- DR to CIC(YS) - S K Chitkara Phone: 01126186535 sk[dot]chitkara[at]nic[dot]in First Appellate Authority Details :- Ms[dot] ROOP AVTAR KAUR Phone: 011-26162290 as-cic[at]nic[dot]in Nodal Officer Details :- Telephone Number 011-26172690 Email Id rticell[at]cic[dot]nic[dot]in.” DECISION OF THE FIRST APPELLATE AUTHORITY: The First Appeal, RTI application and reply given by CPIO of CIC have been perused. As per Section 2(f) of the RTI Act, 2005 only such information as is available and existing and held by the public authority or is under control of the public authority can be provided by a PIO. The PIO is not supposed to create or collate information that is not a part of the record. Accordingly, the reply given by the CPIO is appropriate and as per the provisions of the RTI Act, 2005. Hence, no intervention is required on behalf of the FAA in this matter. The appeal is disposed of accordingly. NA
1292 CICOM/A/E/23/00094 Ms. ROOP AVTAR KAUR 15-03-2023 Ref RTI No.- CICOM/R/T/23/00028/1 GROUNDS FOR FIRST APPEAL: The Appellant submitted first appeal stating that “Roop Avtar Kaur Additional Secretary 502 26162290/26175295(F) as-cic@nic.in https://cic.gov.in/cic-official-directory An appeal against CPIO- SHARAD KUMAR who received online application on 03/03/2023 and partially disposing of on 15/03/2023 so he is just wasting public time without obliging his basic duties to improve delivery of public services, no longer call, email from CPIO then no longer he is bothering to write complete information of First Appellate authority and online status showing as follows: File CICOM/R/T/23/00028/1 Dated 15.03.202 file has no electronic signature not esigned/digitally signed so this document is not valid under IT act 2000 then not even official language as per enacted act The Official Languages Act, 1963 not used then on purpose CPIO- Sharad Kumar doing violation of CSMOP, 2019 by DAPG, GOI against which no public servant is exempted to hide contact credentials of Public servant, Public office and here public servant Sharad kumar hiding contact credentials, EPABX/PBX Extension number being hiding, official email id and same for Roop Avtar Kaur being hiding so what is duty of all these public servants who are abusing public, harassing with wasting public time CICOM/R/T/23/00028/1 Prabhjot Singh Gill 03/03/2023 Public Authority Central Information Commission StatusREQUEST DISPOSED OF 15/03/2023 Reply :- Refer to Section 8(1)(j) of RTI Act which is deals with disclosure of personal information and same is reproduced below for your information: Section 8(1) (j) information which relates to personal information the disclosure of which has no relationship to any public activity or interest, or which would cause unwarranted invasion of the privacy of the individual unless the Central Public Information Officer or the State Public Information Officer or the appellate authority, as the case may be, is satisfied that the larger public interest justifies the disclosure of such information. The personal information can be protected under this section. View Document CPIO CENTRAL REGISTRY - I - SHARAD KUMAR Phone: 011-26717353 drcr1[at]cic[dot]nic[dot]in First Appellate Authority Ms[dot] ROOP AVTAR KAUR Phone: 011-26162290 as-cic[at]nic[dot]in Nodal Officer Telephone Number 011-26172690 rticell[at]cic[dot]nic[dot]in CPIO-Sharad Kumar, FAA-Roop Avtar Kumar must read RTI, Enclosures and oblige to dispense information also Make decision against this RTI Appeal with using eoffice,esign/dsc to save public funds, paper and do not send letter post anymore i.e. not required so paperless governance is useful with significance and manually signed decision copies are not acceptable so oblige basic duties to serve public in ethical, timely manner. Prabhjot Singh Gill Son of Ankpal Kaur 8146007472 e-mail Prabhjotgillunique77@hotmail.co.in Psgill7@bluetiehome.com Esigned/digitally signed Decision copy by Roop Avtar Kaur must be uploaded online or even if willing to send same upon provided email ids.” DECISION OF THE FIRST APPELLATE AUTHORITY: The First Appeal, RTI application and reply given by CPIO of CIC have been perused. As per Section 2(f) of the RTI Act, 2005 only such information as is available and existing and held by the public authority or is under control of the public authority can be provided by a PIO. The PIO is not supposed to create or collate information that is not a part of the record. Accordingly, the reply given by the CPIO is appropriate and as per the provisions of the RTI Act, 2005. Hence, no intervention is required on behalf of the FAA in this matter. The appeal is disposed of accordingly. NA
1293 CICOM/A/P/23/00040 Ms. ROOP AVTAR KAUR 14-03-2023 आर. टी. आई. आवेदन, प्रदान की गई सूचना एवं प्रथम अपील का अवलोकन करने पर पाया गया कि अपीलकर्ता के आर.टी.आई. आवेदन सं. CICOM/R/P/23/00078 में सूचना मांगी थी जिसके प्रतिउत्तर में केंद्रीय जन सूचना अधिकारी द्वारा प्रेषित की गई सूचना, सूचना का अधिकार अधिनियम के प्रावधानों एवं मांगी गई सूचना के अनुसार ही है। परन्तु आपने अपनी प्रथम अपील में यह कहा है कि अभी तक कोई सूचना प्राप्त नहीं कराई गई। जबकि केंद्रीय जन सूचना अधिकारी द्वारा पत्र दिनांक 01.03.2023 के द्वारा सूचना भेजी जा चुकी है। केंद्रीय जन सूचना अधिकारी द्वारा दी गई सूचना, दिनांक 01.03.2023 की प्रति, प्रथम अपील के आर्डर के साथ संलग्न की जा रही है I अतः केंद्रीय जन सूचना अधिकारी द्वारा प्रदान की गई सूचना तथ्यात्मक है और इसमें प्रथम अपीलीय अधिकारी के हस्तक्षेप की कोई आवश्यकता नहीं है। NA
1294 CICOM/A/E/23/00091 Ms. ROOP AVTAR KAUR 14-03-2023 Ref RTI No.- CICOM/R/E/23/00216 GROUNDS FOR FIRST APPEAL: The Appellant submitted first appeal stating that “You have closed this without giving any information and not even forwarded it to the right authority. If you do not have this information, please forward this to the right authority who has the information.” DECISION OF THE FIRST APPELLATE AUTHORITY: The First Appeal, RTI application and reply given by CPIO of CIC have been perused. As per Section 2(f) of the RTI Act, 2005 only such information as is available and existing and held by the public authority or is under control of the public authority can be provided by a PIO. The PIO is not supposed to create or collate information that is not a part of the record. Accordingly, the reply given by the CPIO is appropriate and as per the provisions of the RTI Act, 2005. Hence, no intervention is required on behalf of the FAA in this matter. The appeal is disposed of accordingly. NA
1295 CICOM/A/E/23/00089 Ms. ROOP AVTAR KAUR 13-03-2023 Ref RTI No.- CICOM/R/E/23/00104 GROUNDS FOR FIRST APPEAL: The Appellant submitted first appeal stating that “Sir, Information may be provided without further delay. Thank you” DECISION OF THE FIRST APPELLATE AUTHORITY: The First Appeal, RTI application and reply given by CPIO of CIC have been perused. As per Section 2(f) of the RTI Act, 2005 only such information as is available and existing and held by the public authority or is under control of the public authority can be provided by a PIO. The PIO is not supposed to create, collate or segregate information that is not a part of the record. In the instant case, the appellant filed First Appeal on 13.03.2023 whereas the CPIO (Legal Cell) furnished the reply to the RTI application on the same date. Accordingly, the reply given by the CPIO is appropriate and as per the provisions of the RTI Act, 2005. Hence, no intervention is required on behalf of the FAA in this matter. The appeal is disposed of accordingly. NA
1296 CICOM/A/E/23/00090 Ms. ROOP AVTAR KAUR 13-03-2023 Ref RTI No.- CICOM/R/T/23/00017 GROUNDS FOR FIRST APPEAL: The Appellant submitted first appeal stating that “Roop Avtar Kaur Additional Secretary 502 26162290/26175295(F) as-cic@nic.in https://cic.gov.in/cic-official-directory An appeal against U S KANYAL who received online application on 17/02/2023 and partially disposing of on 13/03/2023 so he is just wasting public time without obliging his basic duties to improve delivery of public services, no longer call, email from CPIO then no longer he is bothering to write complete information of First Appellate authority and online status showing as follows: Enter Registration Number CICOM/R/T/23/00017 Name Prabhjot Singh Gill Received Date 17/02/2023 Public Authority Central Information Commission Status REQUEST DISPOSED OF Date of action 13/03/2023 Reply :- Si, No information is available on any of the points of the RTI application . First Appeal lie with Addl Secretary & FAA CIC . CICOM/R/T/23/00017 U S KANYAL -SO Legal 011-26181928 so-jslaw@cic.nic.in REQUEST DISPOSED OF 13/03/23 Si, No information is available on any of the points of the RTI application . First Appeal lie with Addl Secretary & FAA CIC https://rtionline.gov.in/request/status.php Nodal Officer Details :-Telephone Number 011-26172690Email Id rticell@cic.nic.in Make decision against this RTI Appeal with using eoffice,esign/dsc to save public funds, paper and do not send letter post anymore i.e. not required so paperless governance is useful with significance and manually signed decision copies are not acceptable so oblige basic duties to serve public in ethical, timely manner. Thanking you Prabhjot Singh Gill Son of Ankpal Kaur 8146007472 e-mail Prabhjotgillunique77@hotmail.co.in Psgill7@bluetiehome.com Esigned/digitally Decision copy by Roop Avtar Kaur must be uploaded online or even if willing to send same upon provided electronic email ids.” DECISION OF THE FIRST APPELLATE AUTHORITY: The First Appeal, RTI application and reply given by CPIO of CIC have been perused. As per Section 2(f) of the RTI Act, 2005 only such information as is available and existing and held by the public authority or is under control of the public authority can be provided by a PIO. The PIO is not supposed to create or collate information that is not a part of the record. Accordingly, the reply given by the CPIO is appropriate and as per the provisions of the RTI Act, 2005. Hence, no intervention is required on behalf of the FAA in this matter. The appeal is disposed of accordingly. NA
1297 CICOM/A/P/23/00037 Ms. ROOP AVTAR KAUR 10-03-2023 आर.टी.आई. आवेदन एवं प्रथम अपील का अवलोकन करने पर पाया गया कि अपीलकर्ता के आर.टी. आई. आवेदन सं CICOM/R/P/23/00027 के प्रतिउत्तर में कोई भी सूचना प्रदान नहीं की गई है। अतः केंद्रीय जन सूचना अधिकारी को यह निर्देश दिए जाता है कि वह अपीलकर्ता को आर.टी.आई. आवेदन सं. CICOM/R/P/23/00027 तहत मांगी गई सूचना दिनांक 10.04.2023 तक अपीलकर्ता को (फ्री ऑफ कॉस्ट) ऑफलाइन प्रेषित की जाये। NA
1298 CICOM/A/P/23/00038 Ms. ROOP AVTAR KAUR 10-03-2023 आर. टी. आई. आवेदन, प्रदान की गई सूचना एवं प्रथम अपील का अवलोकन करने पर पाया गया कि अपीलकर्ता के आर.टी.आई. आवेदन सं. CICOM/R/X/23/00013 में सूचना मांगी थी जिसके प्रतिउत्तर में केंद्रीय जन सूचना अधिकारी द्वारा प्रेषित की गई सूचना, सूचना का अधिकार अधिनियम के प्रावधानों एवं मांगी गई सूचना के अनुसार ही है। अतः केंद्रीय जन सूचना अधिकारी द्वारा प्रदान की गई सूचना तथ्यात्मक है और इसमें प्रथम अपीलीय अधिकारी के हस्तक्षेप की कोई आवश्यकता नहीं है। NA
1299 CICOM/A/P/23/00039 Ms. ROOP AVTAR KAUR 10-03-2023 Ref RTI No.- CICOM/R/P/22/00650 GROUNDS FOR FIRST APPEAL: The Appellant submitted first appeal stating that “I am to invite your kind attention towards the RTI application dated 23.11.2022 submitted to PIO CIC New Delhi and to say that the requisite information furnished by the CPIO is misleading and incorrect.” DECISION OF FIRST APPELLATE AUTHORITY: The First Appeal and the RTI application have been perused. CPIO (DR to IC-UM) is directed to reply to the RTI application as per the provisions of the RTI Act, 2005 by 06.04.2023, free of cost. The appeal is disposed of accordingly. NA
1300 CICOM/A/P/23/00036 Ms. ROOP AVTAR KAUR 10-03-2023 आर. टी. आई. आवेदन, प्रदान की गई सूचना एवं प्रथम अपील का अवलोकन करने पर पाया गया कि अपीलकर्ता के आर.टी.आई. आवेदन सं. CICOM/R/P/23/00064 में सूचना मांगी थी जिसके प्रतिउत्तर में केंद्रीय जन सूचना अधिकारी द्वारा प्रेषित की गई सूचना, सूचना का अधिकार अधिनियम के प्रावधानों एवं मांगी गई सूचना के अनुसार ही है। अतः केंद्रीय जन सूचना अधिकारी द्वारा प्रदान की गई सूचना तथ्यात्मक है और इसमें प्रथम अपीलीय अधिकारी के हस्तक्षेप की कोई आवश्यकता नहीं है। NA