There are serious errors in your form submission, please see below for details.

Search RTI Appeal

List of RTI Appeal

SNo. Registration No Appellate Authority Name Received date Reply Appeal Reply Doc
1321 CICOM/A/E/23/00077 Ms. ROOP AVTAR KAUR 27-02-2023 Ref RTI No.- CICOM/R/E/23/00108 GROUNDS FOR FIRST APPEAL: The Appellant submitted first appeal stating that “Please provide me correct answer of RTI query.” DECISION OF THE FIRST APPELLATE AUTHORITY: The First Appeal, RTI application and reply given by CPIO of CIC have been perused. As per Section 2(f) of the RTI Act, 2005 only such information as is available and existing and held by the public authority or is under control of the public authority can be provided by a PIO. The PIO is not supposed to create or collate information that is not a part of the record. Accordingly, the reply given by the CPIO is appropriate and as per the provisions of the RTI Act, 2005. Hence, no intervention is required on behalf of the FAA in this matter. The appeal is disposed of accordingly. NA
1322 CICOM/A/E/23/00076 Ms. ROOP AVTAR KAUR 26-02-2023 ऑनलाइन आर. टी. आई. आवेदन, प्रदान की गई सूचना एवं प्रथम अपील का अवलोकन करने पर पाया गया कि अपीलकर्ता के आर.टी.आई. आवेदन CICOM/R/E/2023/00051 के प्रतिउत्तर में केंद्रीय जन सूचना अधिकारी द्वारा प्रेषित की गई सूचना, सूचना का अधिकार अधिनियम के प्रावधानों एवं मांगी गई सूचना के अनुसार ही है। अतः केंद्रीय जन सूचना अधिकारी द्वारा प्रदान की गई सूचना तथ्यात्मक है और इसमें प्रथम अपीलीय अधिकारी के हस्तक्षेप की कोई आवश्यकता नहीं है। NA
1323 CICOM/A/E/23/00075 Ms. ROOP AVTAR KAUR 24-02-2023 ऑनलाइन आर.टी.आई. आवेदन एवं प्रथम अपील का अवलोकन करने पर पाया गया कि अपीलकर्ता के आर.टी. आई. आवेदन सं CICOM/R/E/2023/00071 के प्रतिउत्तर में कोई भी सूचना प्रदान नहीं की गई है। अतः केंद्रीय जन सूचना अधिकारी को यह निर्देश दिए जाता है कि वह अपीलकर्ता को आर.टी.आई. आवेदन सं. CICOM/R/E/2023/00071 तहत मांगी गई सूचना 10 दिन के भीतर दिनांक 20.03.2023 तक अपीलकर्ता को (फ्री ऑफ कॉस्ट) ऑफलाइन प्रेषित की जाये। NA
1324 CICOM/A/E/23/00074 Ms. ROOP AVTAR KAUR 23-02-2023 Ref RTI No.- CICOM/R/E/23/00135 GROUNDS FOR FIRST APPEAL: The Appellant submitted first appeal stating that “My Query is related to the statement i.e. “As per the Section 6(1) of the RTI Act, 2005 it is the duty of the applicant to file information request with the concerned Public Authority which holds the information” mentioned by the FAA of the Central Information Commission, Government of India in his/her ORDER dated 17.02.2023 in pursuance to my appeal no- CICOM/A/E/23/00043. Respected Sir/Madam, this is for your kind information that the said statement is not written by me or not copied from any unknown source. But, surprisingly in response to my RTI Petition the CPIO replied me that “For Desired information kindly go through the Section 6 (1) of the RTI Act, 2005 available in CIC website link https://cic.gov.in/sites/default/files/RTI-Act_English.pdf”. Now after scrutiny, I did not find the said statement on the above mentioned link provided by the said CPIO. Moreover the said CPIO also written that “No other information is available on record.” This clearly transpires that if the said statement is not available in any u/s Subject to the provisions of the RTI Act 2005 then the content mentioned in the ORDER dated 17.02.2023, issued in pursuance to my appeal no- CICOM/A/E/23/00043 will be vague, indefinite & misleading. In that case I have no other option left except to knock on the door of the Hon’ble High Court against CIC for providing vague, indefinite & misleading information in pursuance to my RTI First Appeal Petition. In view of the above, I hope that I have tried my best to explain my ground of appeal & I shall forever be indebted to you if you kindly consider the above mentioned matter on top priority basis & take appropriate action as per u/s 18(1), u/s 20(1), 19(8) (b) & 20(2) Subject to the provisions of RTI Act 2005 & investigate the matter as early as possible & provide me with the information or the supporting document/documents as per u/s 19(6), u/s 19(1), u/s 6(1), u/s 6(2) subject to the provisions of the RTI Act, 2005 as mentioned by me in my said RTI petition.” DECISION OF THE FIRST APPELLATE AUTHORITY: The First Appeal, RTI application and reply given by CPIO of CIC have been perused. As per Section 2(f) of the RTI Act, 2005 only such information as is available and existing and held by the public authority or is under control of the public authority can be provided by a PIO. The PIO is not supposed to create, collate or interpret information that is not a part of the record. The information once published in public domain may not be treated as information held by a particular public authority. Accordingly, the reply given by the CPIO is appropriate and as per the provisions of the RTI Act, 2005. Hence, no intervention is required on behalf of the FAA in this matter. The appeal is disposed of accordingly. NA
1325 CICOM/A/P/23/00026 Ms. ROOP AVTAR KAUR 22-02-2023 आर. टी. आई. आवेदन, प्रदान की गई सूचना एवं प्रथम अपील का अवलोकन करने पर पाया गया कि अपीलकर्ता के आर.टी.आई. आवेदन सं. CICOM/R/P/23/00012 में सूचना मांगी थी जिसके प्रतिउत्तर में केंद्रीय जन सूचना अधिकारी द्वारा प्रेषित की गई सूचना, सूचना का अधिकार अधिनियम के प्रावधानों एवं मांगी गई सूचना के अनुसार ही है। अतः केंद्रीय जन सूचना अधिकारी द्वारा प्रदान की गई सूचना तथ्यात्मक है और इसमें प्रथम अपीलीय अधिकारी के हस्तक्षेप की कोई आवश्यकता नहीं है। NA
1326 CICOM/A/E/23/00073 Ms. ROOP AVTAR KAUR 22-02-2023 Ref RTI No.- CICOM/R/E/22/01036 GROUNDS FOR FIRST APPEAL: The Appellant submitted first appeal stating that No reply of the RTI filed has been given till date, so please direct the CPIO to provide the sought information. DECISION OF THE FIRST APPELLATE AUTHORITY: The First Appeal and the RTI application have been perused. CPIO (DR to IC-UM) is directed to reply to the RTI application as per the provisions of the RTI Act, 2005 by 23.03.2023, free of cost. The appeal is disposed of accordingly. NA
1327 CICOM/A/P/23/00025 Ms. ROOP AVTAR KAUR 22-02-2023 Ref RTI No.- CICOM/R/P/22/00699 GROUNDS FOR FIRST APPEAL: The Appellant submitted first appeal stating that “...During the years 2009, Commission passed an order on 12-1-2009 directly the PIO, MCD, Vig. Deptt Delhi to provide the Information to the appellant by 30-1-2009 in Decision No.- CIC/WB/A/2008/01398/SG/0986 dated 17-11-2009 which is self explanatory (copy enclosed). In response to the Commission’s Order, PIO, Vig MCD, Delhi provided the required attested copies of noting page 1 to 5 and copy of the office order No.- AD/Vig-II/AK/2009/5726 dated 07-12-2009 whereby warning has been issued to Dr. V.N. Chaturvedi, Veterinary Officer vide no.- PIO(Vig)/ CRIA/HC/Misc/2009/5764 dated 10-12-2009 with enclosures (copies are enclosed). When the MCD Vig, deptt. Delhi have no objection to provided the attested copy of action taken on the complaint against their class I officer then why State Bank of India have not provided the attested copy of the action taken or not taken on the complaint against their official.” DECISION OF FIRST APPELLATE AUTHORITY: The First Appeal, RTI application and reply given by CPIO of CIC have been perused. As per Section 2(f) of the RTI Act, 2005 only such information as is available and existing and held by the public authority or is under control of the public authority can be provided by a PIO. The PIO is not supposed to create, collate or interpret information that is not a part of the record. In the instant case, the grounds of appeal mentioned by appellant in the first appeal are beyond the mandate of the First Appellate Authority. Accordingly, the reply given by the CPIO is appropriate and as per the provisions of the RTI Act, 2005. Hence, no intervention is required on behalf of the FAA in this matter. The appeal is disposed of accordingly. NA
1328 CICOM/A/P/23/00022 Ms. ROOP AVTAR KAUR 20-02-2023 आर. टी. आई. आवेदन, प्रदान की गई सूचना एवं प्रथम अपील का अवलोकन करने पर पाया गया कि अपीलकर्ता के आर.टी.आई. आवेदन सं. CICOM/R/P/23/00033 में सूचना मांगी थी जिसके प्रतिउत्तर में केंद्रीय जन सूचना अधिकारी द्वारा प्रेषित की गई सूचना, सूचना का अधिकार अधिनियम के प्रावधानों एवं मांगी गई सूचना के अनुसार ही है। आपके द्वारा मांगी गई सूचना बिंदु सं 2 और 3 में सूचना के अधिकार नियम 2012 के लिंक dopt.gov.in/hi/acts/सूचना-का-अधिकार-नियम-2012 का अवलोकन करें। तथा आर.टी. आई एक्ट, 2005 के लिंक cic.gov.in/sites/default/files/rti-actinhindi.pdf का अवलोकन करें। अतः केंद्रीय जन सूचना अधिकारी द्वारा प्रदान की गई सूचना तथ्यात्मक है और इसमें प्रथम अपीलीय अधिकारी के हस्तक्षेप की कोई आवश्यकता नहीं है। NA
1329 CICOM/A/P/23/00023 Ms. ROOP AVTAR KAUR 20-02-2023 आर.टी.आई. आवेदन एवं प्रथम अपील का अवलोकन करने पर पाया गया कि अपीलकर्ता के आर.टी. आई. आवेदन सं CICOM/R/P/23/00037 के प्रतिउत्तर में कोई भी सूचना प्रदान नहीं की गई है। अतः केंद्रीय जन सूचना अधिकारी को यह निर्देश दिए जाता है कि वह अपीलकर्ता को आर.टी.आई. आवेदन सं. CICOM/R/P/23/00037 तहत मांगी गई सूचना 10 दिन के भीतर दिनांक 27.03.2023 तक अपीलकर्ता को (फ्री ऑफ कॉस्ट) ऑफलाइन प्रेषित की जाये। NA
1330 CICOM/A/E/23/00072 Ms. ROOP AVTAR KAUR 20-02-2023 ऑनलाइन आर. टी. आई. आवेदन, प्रदान की गई सूचना एवं प्रथम अपील का अवलोकन करने पर पाया गया कि अपीलकर्ता के आर.टी.आई. आवेदन CICOM/R/E/2023/00130 के प्रतिउत्तर में केंद्रीय जन सूचना अधिकारी द्वारा प्रेषित की गई सूचना, सूचना का अधिकार अधिनियम के प्रावधानों एवं मांगी गई सूचना के अनुसार ही है। अतः केंद्रीय जन सूचना अधिकारी द्वारा प्रदान की गई सूचना तथ्यात्मक है और इसमें प्रथम अपीलीय अधिकारी के हस्तक्षेप की कोई आवश्यकता नहीं है। NA