There are serious errors in your form submission, please see below for details.

Search RTI Appeal

List of RTI Appeal

SNo. Registration No Appellate Authority Name Received date Reply Appeal Reply Doc
1331 CICOM/A/P/23/00024 Ms. ROOP AVTAR KAUR 20-02-2023 Ref RTI No.- CICOM/R/P/22/00695 GROUNDS FOR FIRST APPEAL: The Appellant submitted first appeal stating that “...no response has been received from the CPIO even after expiry of prescribed time limit of 30 days and that is deemed refusal on the party of CPIO as per section 7(2) of RTI Act, 2005.” DECISION OF FIRST APPELLATE AUTHORITY: The First Appeal, RTI application and reply given by CPIO of CIC have been perused. As per Section 2(f) of the RTI Act, 2005 only such information as is available and existing and held by the public authority or is under control of the public authority can be provided by a PIO. The PIO is not supposed to create or collate information that is not a part of the record. In the instant case, the CPIO furnished reply to the RTI application on 13.01.2023, but as mentioned by the appellant in the first appeal of non-receipt of the reply, a copy of the RTI reply is being attached with this order. Accordingly, the reply given by the CPIO is appropriate and as per the provisions of the RTI Act, 2005. Hence, no intervention is required on behalf of the FAA in this matter. The appeal is disposed of accordingly. NA
1332 CICOM/A/E/23/00071 Ms. ROOP AVTAR KAUR 19-02-2023 Ref RTI No.- CICOM/R/E/22/01350 GROUNDS FOR FIRST APPEAL: The Appellant submitted first appeal stating that TO THE FAA CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION SUBJECT:FIRST APPEAL U/S 19 OF RTI ACT 2005 RESPECTED SIR/MADAM REQUEST YOU TO KINDLY DIRECT CPIO TO PROVIDE COMPLETE INFORMATION WITHIN 7 DAYS AND FREE OF COST. DECISION OF THE FIRST APPELLATE AUTHORITY: The First Appeal and the RTI application have been perused. CPIO (DR to IC-UM) is directed to reply to the RTI application as per the provisions of the RTI Act, 2005 by 23.03.2023, free of cost. The appeal is disposed of accordingly. NA
1333 CICOM/A/E/23/00070 Ms. ROOP AVTAR KAUR 18-02-2023 ऑनलाइन आर. टी. आई. आवेदन, प्रदान की गई सूचना एवं प्रथम अपील का अवलोकन करने पर पाया गया कि अपीलकर्ता के आर.टी.आई. आवेदन CICOM/R/E/2023/00050 के प्रतिउत्तर में केंद्रीय जन सूचना अधिकारी द्वारा प्रेषित की गई सूचना, सूचना का अधिकार अधिनियम के प्रावधानों एवं मांगी गई सूचना के अनुसार ही है। अतः केंद्रीय जन सूचना अधिकारी द्वारा प्रदान की गई सूचना तथ्यात्मक है और इसमें प्रथम अपीलीय अधिकारी के हस्तक्षेप की कोई आवश्यकता नहीं है। NA
1334 CICOM/A/P/23/00021 Ms. ROOP AVTAR KAUR 17-02-2023 आर. टी. आई. आवेदन, प्रदान की गई सूचना एवं प्रथम अपील का अवलोकन करने पर पाया गया कि अपीलकर्ता के आर.टी.आई. आवेदन सं. CICOM/R/P/22/00681 में सूचना मांगी थी जिसके प्रतिउत्तर में केंद्रीय जन सूचना अधिकारी द्वारा प्रेषित की गई सूचना, सूचना का अधिकार अधिनियम के प्रावधानों एवं मांगी गई सूचना के अनुसार ही है। परन्तु आपने अपनी प्रथम अपील में यह कहा है कि अभी तक कोई सूचना प्राप्त नहीं कराई गई। जबकि केंद्रीय जन सूचना अधिकारी द्वारा पत्र दिनांक 12.01.2023 के द्वारा सूचना भेजी का चुकी है। केंद्रीय जन सूचना अधिकारी द्वारा दी गई सूचना, दिनांक 12.01.2023 की प्रति, प्रथम अपील के आर्डर के साथ संलग्न की जा रही है I अतः केंद्रीय जन सूचना अधिकारी द्वारा प्रदान की गई सूचना तथ्यात्मक है और इसमें प्रथम अपीलीय अधिकारी के हस्तक्षेप की कोई आवश्यकता नहीं है। NA
1335 CICOM/A/E/23/00066 Ms. ROOP AVTAR KAUR 17-02-2023 Ref RTI No.- CICOM/R/E/23/00062 GROUNDS FOR FIRST APPEAL: The Appellant submitted first appeal stating that: “Please see online RTI Reference number -CICOM/R/E/23/00074 in from 6(1) you will get the clear reason for my RTI application.” DECISION OF THE FIRST APPELLATE AUTHORITY: The First Appeal, RTI application and reply given by CPIO of CIC have been perused. As per Section 2(f) of the RTI Act, 2005 only such information as is available and existing and held by the public authority or is under control of the public authority can be provided by a PIO. The PIO is not supposed to create or collate information that is not a part of the record. The appellant in the grounds of appeal has mentioned to see online RTI No. CICOM/R/E/23/00074, whereas the appellant has filed an appeal on RTI No. CICOM/R/E/23/00062 and did not mention any grounds related to RTI No. CICOM/R/E/23/00062. The functioning of State Information Commissions does not come under the purview/ambit of Central Information Commission. You are therefore, advised to approach the concerned public authority i.e. State Information Commission, Uttar Pradesh in the instant case. Accordingly, the reply given by the CPIO is appropriate and as per the provisions of the RTI Act, 2005. Hence, no intervention is required on behalf of the FAA in this matter. The appeal is disposed of accordingly. NA
1336 CICOM/A/E/23/00067 Ms. ROOP AVTAR KAUR 17-02-2023 Ref RTI No.- CICOM/R/E/23/00064 GROUNDS FOR FIRST APPEAL: The Appellant submitted first appeal stating that: “Please see online Rti reference number CICOM/R/E/23/00074 in from 6(1) you will get the clear reason for my Rti application.” DECISION OF THE FIRST APPELLATE AUTHORITY: The First Appeal, RTI application and reply given by CPIO of CIC have been perused. As per Section 2(f) of the RTI Act, 2005 only such information as is available and existing and held by the public authority or is under control of the public authority can be provided by a PIO. The PIO is not supposed to create or collate information that is not a part of the record. The appellant in the grounds of appeal has mentioned to see online RTI No. CICOM/R/E/23/00074, whereas the appellant has filed an appeal on RTI No. CICOM/R/E/23/00064 and did not mention any grounds related to RTI No. CICOM/R/E/23/00064. The functioning of State Information Commissions does not come under the purview/ambit of Central Information Commission. You are therefore, advised to approach the concerned public authority i.e. State Information Commission, Uttar Pradesh in the instant case. Accordingly, the reply given by the CPIO is appropriate and as per the provisions of the RTI Act, 2005. Hence, no intervention is required on behalf of the FAA in this matter. The appeal is disposed of accordingly. NA
1337 CICOM/A/E/23/00068 Ms. ROOP AVTAR KAUR 17-02-2023 Ref RTI No.- CICOM/R/E/23/00063 GROUNDS FOR FIRST APPEAL: The Appellant submitted first appeal stating that: “Please see online Rti reference number - CICOM/R/E/23/00074 in from 6(1) You will get the clear reason for my Rti application.” DECISION OF THE FIRST APPELLATE AUTHORITY: The First Appeal, RTI application and reply given by CPIO of CIC have been perused. As per Section 2(f) of the RTI Act, 2005 only such information as is available and existing and held by the public authority or is under control of the public authority can be provided by a PIO. The PIO is not supposed to create or collate information that is not a part of the record. The appellant in the grounds of appeal has mentioned to see online RTI No. CICOM/R/E/23/00074, whereas the appellant has filed an appeal on RTI No. CICOM/R/E/23/00063 and did not mention any grounds related to RTI No. CICOM/R/E/23/00063. The functioning of State Information Commissions does not come under the purview/ambit of Central Information Commission. You are therefore, advised to approach the concerned public authority i.e. State Information Commission, Uttar Pradesh in the instant case. Accordingly, the reply given by the CPIO is appropriate and as per the provisions of the RTI Act, 2005. Hence, no intervention is required on behalf of the FAA in this matter. The appeal is disposed of accordingly. NA
1338 CICOM/A/E/23/00069 Ms. ROOP AVTAR KAUR 17-02-2023 Ref RTI No.- CICOM/R/E/22/01371 GROUNDS FOR FIRST APPEAL: The Appellant submitted first appeal stating that no information was provided. DECISION OF THE FIRST APPELLATE AUTHORITY: The First Appeal, RTI application and reply given by CPIO of CIC have been perused. As per Section 2(f) of the RTI Act, 2005 only such information as is available and existing and held by the public authority or is under control of the public authority can be provided by a PIO. The PIO is not supposed to create or collate information that is not a part of the record. Accordingly, the reply given by the CPIO is appropriate and as per the provisions of the RTI Act, 2005. Hence, no intervention is required on behalf of the FAA in this matter. The appeal is disposed of accordingly. NA
1339 CICOM/A/P/23/00019 Ms. ROOP AVTAR KAUR 16-02-2023 आर. टी. आई. आवेदन, प्रदान की गई सूचना एवं प्रथम अपील का अवलोकन करने पर पाया गया कि अपीलकर्ता के आर.टी.आई. आवेदन सं. CICOM/R/P/23/00021 में सूचना मांगी थी जिसके प्रतिउत्तर में केंद्रीय जन सूचना अधिकारी द्वारा प्रेषित की गई सूचना, सूचना का अधिकार अधिनियम के प्रावधानों एवं मांगी गई सूचना के अनुसार ही है। अतः केंद्रीय जन सूचना अधिकारी द्वारा प्रदान की गई सूचना तथ्यात्मक है और इसमें प्रथम अपीलीय अधिकारी के हस्तक्षेप की कोई आवश्यकता नहीं है। NA
1340 CICOM/A/P/23/00018 Ms. ROOP AVTAR KAUR 16-02-2023 Ref RTI No.- CICOM/R/P/22/00704 GROUNDS FOR FIRST APPEAL: The Appellant submitted the first appeal stating that “...From the information provided in the matter and the facts narrated above, it is evident that the acts of the PA to the FAA, in not making noting, not putting up the review application dated 05.09.22 to the FAA and linking it with so called First appeal no. CICOM/A/P/22/ 00112, are illegitimate and unlawful....” DECISION OF FIRST APPELLATE AUTHORITY: The First Appeal, RTI application and reply given by CPIO of CIC have been perused. As per Section 2(f) of the RTI Act, 2005 only such information as is available and existing and held by the public authority or is under control of the public authority can be provided by a PIO. The PIO is not supposed to create or collate information that is not a part of the record. Accordingly, the reply given by the CPIO is appropriate and as per the provisions of the RTI Act, 2005. Hence, no intervention is required on behalf of the FAA in this matter. The appeal is disposed of accordingly. NA