SNo. |
Registration No |
Appellate Authority Name |
Received date |
Reply Appeal |
Reply Doc |
221 |
CICOM/A/E/25/00021 |
Brig. VIPIN CHAKRAWARTI |
25-01-2025 |
The Online First Appeal, RTI application and reply given by CPIO of CIC have been perused. As per Section 2 (f) of the RTI Act, 2005 only such information as is available and existing and held by the public authority or is under control of the public authority can be provided by a PIO. The PIO is not supposed to create or collate information that is not a part of the record. Accordingly, the reply given by the CPIO is appropriate and as per the provisions of the RTI Act, 2005. Hence, no intervention is required on behalf of the FAA in this matter.
The appeal is disposed of accordingly. |
NA |
222 |
CICOM/A/E/25/00022 |
Brig. VIPIN CHAKRAWARTI |
25-01-2025 |
On perusal of the online Appeal, RTI application and reply of the CPIO, it is observed that the information given by the CPIO is as per provisions of the RTI Act, 2005. There is no facility available for video conferencing for hearing of first appeal. Therefore, no further intervention is required on the part of FAA in the matter. |
NA |
223 |
CICOM/A/E/25/00023 |
Ms. ROOP AVTAR KAUR |
25-01-2025 |
Ref RTI No. - CICOM/R/E/24/01660
GROUNDS FOR FIRST APPEAL:
The Appellant submitted first appeal stating that CPIO refused access to information requested.
DECISION OF FIRST APPELLATE AUTHORITY:
The First Appeal, RTI application and reply given by CPIO of CIC have been perused.
As per Section 2(f) of the RTI Act, 2005 only such information as is available and existing and held by the public authority or is under control of the public authority can be provided by a PIO. The PIO is not supposed to create or collate information that is not a part of the record.
The information once published in public domain may not be treated as information held by a particular public authority.
Accordingly, the reply given by the CPIO is appropriate and as per the provisions of the RTI Act,2005. Hence, no intervention is required on behalf of the FAA in this matter.
The appeal is disposed of accordingly. |
NA |
224 |
CICOM/A/E/25/00020 |
Ms. ROOP AVTAR KAUR |
24-01-2025 |
Ref RTI No. - CICOM/R/E/24/01676
GROUNDS FOR FIRST APPEAL:
The Appellant submitted first appeal stating that CPIO refused access to information requested.
DECISION OF FIRST APPELLATE AUTHORITY:
The First Appeal, RTI application and reply given by CPIO of CIC have been perused.
As per Section 2(f) of the RTI Act, 2005 only such information as is available and existing and held by the public authority or is under control of the public authority can be provided by a PIO. The PIO is not supposed to create or collate information that is not a part of the record.
The information once published in public domain may not be treated as information held by a particular public authority.
Accordingly, the reply given by the CPIO is appropriate and as per the provisions of the RTI Act,2005. Hence, no intervention is required on behalf of the FAA in this matter.
The appeal is disposed of accordingly. |
NA |
225 |
CICOM/A/P/25/00034 |
Brig. VIPIN CHAKRAWARTI |
24-01-2025 |
Please see the file. |
|
226 |
CICOM/A/E/25/00018 |
Brig. VIPIN CHAKRAWARTI |
23-01-2025 |
The Online First Appeal, RTI application and reply given by CPIO of CIC have been perused. As per Section 2 (f) of the RTI Act, 2005 only such information as is available and existing and held by the public authority or is under control of the public authority can be provided by a PIO. The PIO is not supposed to create or collate information that is not a part of the record. Accordingly, the reply given by the CPIO is appropriate and as per the provisions of the RTI Act, 2005. Hence, no intervention is required on behalf of the FAA in this matter.
The appeal is disposed of accordingly. |
NA |
227 |
CICOM/A/E/25/00019 |
Ms. ROOP AVTAR KAUR |
23-01-2025 |
Ref RTI No. - CICOM/R/E/25/00009
GROUNDS FOR FIRST APPEAL:
The Appellant submitted first appeal being unsatisfied with the reply of CPIO.
DECISION OF FIRST APPELLATE AUTHORITY:
The First Appeal, RTI application and reply given by CPIO of CIC have been perused.
The information sought by the applicant in the RTI application appears to be related to the State Election Commission. The applicant may approach the concerned Public Authority. Further, the working of State Public Authorities comes under the domain of State Information Commission and not come under the domain of the Central Information Commission.
As per the Section 6(1) of the RTI Act, 2005, the applicant shall file information request with the concerned Public Authority which holds the information.
As per Section 2(f) of the RTI Act, 2005 only such information as is available and existing and held by the public authority or is under control of the public authority can be provided by a PIO. The PIO is not supposed to create or collate information that is not a part of the record.
Accordingly, the reply given by the CPIO is appropriate and as per the provisions of the RTI Act,2005. Hence, no intervention is required on behalf of the FAA in this matter.
The appeal is disposed of accordingly. |
NA |
228 |
CICOM/A/E/25/00017 |
Brig. VIPIN CHAKRAWARTI |
22-01-2025 |
On perusal of the online Appeal, RTI application and reply of the CPIO, it is observed that the information given by the CPIO is as per provisions of the RTI Act, 2005. Therefore, no further intervention is required on the part of FAA in the matter. |
NA |
229 |
CICOM/A/P/25/00033 |
Brig. VIPIN CHAKRAWARTI |
21-01-2025 |
Please see the file. |
|
230 |
CICOM/A/E/25/00015 |
Brig. VIPIN CHAKRAWARTI |
17-01-2025 |
On perusal of the online Appeal, RTI application and reply of the CPIO, it is observed that the information given by the CPIO is as per provisions of the RTI Act, 2005. Therefore, no further intervention is required on the part of FAA in the matter. |
NA |