| SNo. |
Registration No |
Appellate Authority Name |
Received date |
Reply Appeal |
Reply Doc |
| 201 |
CICOM/A/E/25/00036 |
Ms. ROOP AVTAR KAUR |
08-02-2025 |
Ref RTI No. - CICOM/R/E/25/00013
GROUNDS FOR FIRST APPEAL:
The Appellant submitted first appeal stating that CPIO provided incomplete, misleading or false information.
DECISION OF FIRST APPELLATE AUTHORITY:
The First Appeal, RTI application and reply given by CPIO of CIC have been perused.
As per Section 2(f) of the RTI Act, 2005 only such information as is available and existing and held by the public authority or is under control of the public authority can be provided by a PIO. The PIO is not supposed to create or collate information that is not a part of the record.
Accordingly, the reply given by the CPIO is appropriate and as per the provisions of the RTI Act,2005. Hence, no intervention is required on behalf of the FAA in this matter.
The appeal is disposed of accordingly. |
NA |
| 202 |
CICOM/A/E/25/00035 |
Brig. VIPIN CHAKRAWARTI |
07-02-2025 |
On perusal of the online Appeal, RTI application and reply of the CPIO, it is observed that the information given by the CPIO is as per provisions of the RTI Act, 2005. Therefore, no further intervention is required on the part of FAA in the matter. |
NA |
| 203 |
CICOM/A/E/25/00034 |
Brig. VIPIN CHAKRAWARTI |
07-02-2025 |
On perusal of the Online Appeal, RTI application and reply of the CPIO, it is observed that the information given by the CPIO for the RTI application No CICOM/R/E/24/01688/1 is not as per the provision or RTI Act, 2005. Accordingly, direction is being given to CPIO, (DR to IC VT) to revisit the matter and provide complete appropriate information point wise within 10 days of receipt of this order. |
NA |
| 204 |
CICOM/A/E/25/00032 |
Brig. VIPIN CHAKRAWARTI |
06-02-2025 |
The First Appeal, RTI application and reply given by CPIO of CIC have been perused.
The reply given by the CPIO is appropriate and as per the provisions of the RTI Act, 2005. Hence, no intervention is required on behalf of the FAA in this matter.
The appeal is disposed of accordingly. |
NA |
| 205 |
CICOM/A/E/25/00033 |
Ms. ROOP AVTAR KAUR |
06-02-2025 |
Ref RTI No. - CICOM/R/E/25/00012
GROUNDS FOR FIRST APPEAL:
The Appellant submitted first appeal stating that
"The questions asked were precise but unfortunately, instead of giving pointwise responses of the questions the link to RTI Act document was provided. I request and appeal that point wise response to the questions should be provided. The questions asked are important as there are instances where many of the PIOs are demanding the Bank account details of the RTI applicant."
DECISION OF FIRST APPELLATE AUTHORITY:
The First Appeal, RTI application and reply given by CPIO of CIC have been perused.
As per Section 2(f) of the RTI Act, 2005 only such information as is available and existing and held by the public authority or is under control of the public authority can be provided by a PIO. The PIO is not supposed to create or collate information that is not a part of the record. Neither can the CPIO provide analysis or interpretation of the information.
Accordingly, the reply given by the CPIO is appropriate and as per the provisions of the RTI Act,2005. Hence, no intervention is required on behalf of the FAA in this matter.
The appeal is disposed of accordingly. |
NA |
| 206 |
CICOM/A/E/25/00031 |
Ms. ROOP AVTAR KAUR |
04-02-2025 |
Ref RTI No. - CICOM/R/E/24/01690
GROUNDS FOR FIRST APPEAL:
The Appellant submitted first appeal stating that CPIO provided incomplete, misleading or false information.
DECISION OF FIRST APPELLATE AUTHORITY:
The First Appeal, RTI application and reply given by CPIO of CIC have been perused.
As per Section 2(f) of the RTI Act, 2005 only such information as is available and existing and held by the public authority or is under control of the public authority can be provided by a PIO. The PIO is not supposed to create or collate information that is not a part of the record.Neither can the CPIO provide analysis or interpretation of the information.
Accordingly, the reply given by the CPIO is appropriate and as per the provisions of the RTI Act,2005. Hence, no intervention is required on behalf of the FAA in this matter.
The appeal is disposed of accordingly |
NA |
| 207 |
CICOM/A/E/25/00030 |
Brig. VIPIN CHAKRAWARTI |
03-02-2025 |
The Online First Appeal, RTI application and reply given by CPIO of CIC have been perused.
As per Section 2 (f) of the RTI Act, 2005 only such information as is available and existing and held by the public authority or is under control of the public authority can be provided by a PIO. The PIO is not supposed to create or collate information that is not a part of the record.
Accordingly, the reply given by the CPIO is appropriate and as per provisions of the RTI Act, 2005. Hence, no intervention is required on behalf of the FAA in this matter. |
NA |
| 208 |
CICOM/A/P/25/00039 |
Brig. VIPIN CHAKRAWARTI |
03-02-2025 |
Please see the file. |
 |
| 209 |
CICOM/A/P/25/00040 |
Brig. VIPIN CHAKRAWARTI |
03-02-2025 |
PFA |
|
| 210 |
CICOM/A/P/25/00041 |
Brig. VIPIN CHAKRAWARTI |
03-02-2025 |
please see the file. |
|