| SNo. |
Registration No |
Appellate Authority Name |
Received date |
Reply Appeal |
Reply Doc |
| 161 |
CICOM/A/P/25/00069 |
Brig. VIPIN CHAKRAWARTI |
06-03-2025 |
Please see the file. |
 |
| 162 |
CICOM/A/E/25/00050 |
Brig. VIPIN CHAKRAWARTI |
05-03-2025 |
On perusal of the online Appeal, RTI application and reply of the CPIO, it is observed that the information given by the CPIO is as per provisions of the RTI Act, 2005. Therefore, no further intervention is required on the part of FAA in the matter. |
NA |
| 163 |
CICOM/A/P/25/00066 |
Brig. VIPIN CHAKRAWARTI |
04-03-2025 |
Please see the file. |
|
| 164 |
CICOM/A/P/25/00064 |
Brig. VIPIN CHAKRAWARTI |
04-03-2025 |
Please see the file. |
|
| 165 |
CICOM/A/P/25/00065 |
Brig. VIPIN CHAKRAWARTI |
04-03-2025 |
Please see the file. |
|
| 166 |
CICOM/A/E/25/00049 |
Brig. VIPIN CHAKRAWARTI |
04-03-2025 |
The online First Appeal, RTI application and reply given by CPIO of CIC have been perused. Accordingly, the reply given by the CPIO is appropriate and as per provisions of the RTI Act, 2005. Hence, no intervention is required on behalf of the FAA in this matter. |
NA |
| 167 |
CICOM/A/E/25/00048 |
Brig. VIPIN CHAKRAWARTI |
03-03-2025 |
On perusal of the online Appeal, RTI application and reply of the CPIO, it is observed that the information given by the CPIO is as per provisions of the RTI Act, 2005. You can collect the information from the CIC website link https://cic.gov.in. Therefore, no further intervention is required on the part of FAA in the matter. |
NA |
| 168 |
CICOM/A/P/25/00063 |
Brig. VIPIN CHAKRAWARTI |
28-02-2025 |
PFA |
|
| 169 |
CICOM/A/E/25/00047 |
Ms. ROOP AVTAR KAUR |
28-02-2025 |
Ref RTI No. - CICOM/R/E/25/00133
GROUNDS FOR FIRST APPEAL:
The Appellant submitted first appeal stating that CPIO refused access to information requested.
DECISION OF FIRST APPELLATE AUTHORITY:
The First Appeal, RTI application and reply given by CPIO of CIC have been perused.
As per Section 2(f) of the RTI Act, 2005 only such information as is available and existing and held by the public authority or is under control of the public authority can be provided by a PIO. The PIO is not supposed to create or collate information that is not a part of the record.
Further, it is the discretion of the Public Authority to provide information within the ambit of Section 4(1)(b) of the RTI Act, 2005.
Accordingly, the reply given by the CPIO is appropriate and as per the provisions of the RTI Act,2005. Hence, no intervention is required on behalf of the FAA in this matter.
The appeal is disposed of accordingly. |
NA |
| 170 |
CICOM/A/P/25/00062 |
Brig. VIPIN CHAKRAWARTI |
27-02-2025 |
Please see the file. |
|