| SNo. |
Registration No |
Appellate Authority Name |
Received date |
Reply Appeal |
Reply Doc |
| 151 |
CICOM/A/P/25/00074 |
Brig. VIPIN CHAKRAWARTI |
11-03-2025 |
Please see the file. |
 |
| 152 |
CICOM/A/P/25/00071 |
Brig. VIPIN CHAKRAWARTI |
10-03-2025 |
please see the file. |
|
| 153 |
CICOM/A/P/25/00072 |
Brig. VIPIN CHAKRAWARTI |
10-03-2025 |
Please see the file. |
|
| 154 |
CICOM/A/P/25/00070 |
Brig. VIPIN CHAKRAWARTI |
10-03-2025 |
Please see the file. |
|
| 155 |
CICOM/A/E/25/00054 |
Brig. VIPIN CHAKRAWARTI |
08-03-2025 |
The online First Appeal, RTI application and reply given by CPIO of CIC have been perused. Accordingly, the reply given by the CPIO is appropriate and as per provisions of the RTI Act, 2005. Hence, no intervention is required on behalf of the FAA in this matter. |
NA |
| 156 |
CICOM/A/E/25/00053 |
Brig. VIPIN CHAKRAWARTI |
08-03-2025 |
The online First Appeal, RTI application and reply given by CPIO of CIC have been perused. Accordingly, the reply given by the CPIO is appropriate and as per provisions of the RTI Act, 2005. Hence, no intervention is required on behalf of the FAA in this matter. |
NA |
| 157 |
CICOM/A/E/25/00052 |
Ms. ROOP AVTAR KAUR |
08-03-2025 |
Ref RTI No. - CICOM/R/E/25/00037
GROUNDS FOR FIRST APPEAL:
The Appellant submitted first appeal stating that
"I have sought copy of cic decision or judgement between Satyakam srivastav of EME and DGEME regarding PE revision of Foreman in the year 2006 after exact date not known, which is contempt of court that revision is not done yet till 2025, You have provided the website of CIC decision which I have searched and not found, please provide the copy and do the needful sir"
DECISION OF FIRST APPELLATE AUTHORITY:
The First Appeal, RTI application and reply given by CPIO of CIC have been perused.
As per Section 2(f) of the RTI Act, 2005 only such information as is available and existing and held by the public authority or is under control of the public authority can be provided by a PIO. The PIO is not supposed to create or collate information that is not a part of the record.
The information once published in public domain may not be treated as information held by a particular public authority.
Accordingly, the reply given by the CPIO is appropriate and as per the provisions of the RTI Act,2005. Hence, no intervention is required on behalf of the FAA in this matter.
The appeal is disposed of accordingly. |
NA |
| 158 |
CICOM/A/E/25/00051 |
Ms. ROOP AVTAR KAUR |
06-03-2025 |
Ref RTI No. - CICOM/R/T/25/00016
GROUNDS FOR FIRST APPEAL:
The Appellant submitted first appeal stating that
"Aggrieved from the reply given by the PIO I m submitting my appeal as under1) Your CPIO not provided the information required.Direct your PIO to transfer my application to other Public authority which are related to U/s 6(3) of the act."
DECISION OF FIRST APPELLATE AUTHORITY:
The First Appeal, RTI application and reply given by CPIO of CIC have been perused.
As per Section 2(f) of the RTI Act, 2005 only such information as is available and existing and held by the public authority or is under control of the public authority can be provided by a PIO. The PIO is not supposed to create or collate information that is not a part of the record.
As per the Section 6(1) of the RTI Act, 2005, the applicant shall file information request with the concerned Public Authority which holds the information.
Accordingly, the reply given by the CPIO is appropriate and as per the provisions of the RTI Act,2005. Hence, no intervention is required on behalf of the FAA in this matter.
The appeal is disposed of accordingly. |
NA |
| 159 |
CICOM/A/P/25/00067 |
Brig. VIPIN CHAKRAWARTI |
06-03-2025 |
Please see the file. |
|
| 160 |
CICOM/A/P/25/00068 |
Brig. VIPIN CHAKRAWARTI |
06-03-2025 |
Please see the file. |
|