| SNo. |
Registration No |
Appellate Authority Name |
Received date |
Reply Appeal |
Reply Doc |
| 2481 |
CICOM/A/P/20/00061 |
Ms. ROOP AVTAR KAUR |
17-08-2020 |
Please see the file. |
 |
| 2482 |
CICOM/A/P/20/00062 |
Ms. ROOP AVTAR KAUR |
17-08-2020 |
Please see the file. |
|
| 2483 |
CICOM/A/E/20/00139 |
Ms. ROOP AVTAR KAUR |
17-08-2020 |
On perusal of the RTI application, CPIO’s reply and First Appeal filed by the Appellant, it is observed that the Appellant, through his RTI application, has asked reason of returning his complaint petition (diary No. 676705/2020). The CPIO, Sh. KrishanAvtarTalwar in his reply has already informed the Appellant the reason for the same. Hence, the information, provided by the CPIO is factual in nature and as per the provision of the RTI Act, 2005. Accordingly, no further intervention is required on the part of FAA in the matter. |
NA |
| 2484 |
CICOM/A/E/20/00140 |
Ms. ROOP AVTAR KAUR |
17-08-2020 |
Ongoing through the RTI application, CPIO’s reply and First Appeal filed by the appellant, it is observed that the appellant, through his RTI application, has asked for details of the training/orientation programmes organized by the Central Information Commission for newly appointed information Commissioners to make them aware with the provisions of RTI Act, 2005 and the details of such programmes attended by the IC(VN). Together with, certified copies of documents/electronic evidences pertaining to appellant’s eight Second Appeals, which were received by the IC(VN) from the respondent public authority has also been asked for by the Appellant.
It is important to note that under the provisions of Section 2(f) of the RTI Act, only such information, as is available and existing and held by the public authority or is under control of the public authoritycan be provided by a PIO. Accordingly, the CPIO, against point Nos. 1 & 2 has informed the appellant that “No such information is available on record.†In response to the query against point No. 3 of the Appellant, the CPIO has already provided the copies of all documents of the cases files in PDF format to the appellant, which is available in record. Hence the reply given by the CPIO is factual and as per the provision of the RTI Act, 2005. Accordingly, no further intervention is required on the part of FAA in this matter. |
NA |
| 2485 |
CICOM/A/E/20/00138 |
Ms. ROOP AVTAR KAUR |
16-08-2020 |
On perusal of the Appeal, RTI application and reply of the CPIO, it is observed that the information given by CPIO, Sh. Ashok. Kr. Assija is as per provisions of the RTI Act, 2005, therefore, no further intervention is required on the part of FAA in the matter. |
NA |
| 2486 |
CICOM/A/E/20/00137 |
Ms. ROOP AVTAR KAUR |
15-08-2020 |
On perusal of the Appeal, RTI application and reply of the CPIO, it is observed that the information given by CPIO, Sh. R. P. Grover is as per provisions of the RTI Act, 2005. It is important to note that under the provisions of Section 2(f) of the RTI Act, only such information, as is available and existing and held by the public authority or is under control of the public authoritycan be provided by a PIO. The PIO is not supposed to create the information and he is also not required to interpret information or furnish replies to the hypothetical questions. Hence, the information, provided by the CPIO is factual in nature. Accordingly, no further intervention is required on the part of FAA in the matter. |
NA |
| 2487 |
CICOM/A/E/20/00136 |
Ms. ROOP AVTAR KAUR |
15-08-2020 |
On going through the RTI application, CPIO’s reply and First Appeal filed by the Appellant, it is observed that the Appellant, through his RTI application, has asked for copies of the documents/ records (in any form like hard copy, audio cassette etc.), on basis of that the order/observation was passed by the Information Commissioner in the Second Appeal No. CIC/ICARH/A/2020/600799 of the Appellant.
It is important to note that under the provisions of Section 2(f) of the RTI Act, only such information, as is available and existing and held by the public authority or is under control of the public authoritycan be provided by a PIO. The PIO is also not required to interpret information or furnish replies to the hypothetical questions. Whatever the Appellant has asked for was construed as the interpretation of decision passed by the Commission and hence the reply given by CPIO which has been further clarified now by the Appellant in his First Appeal. Accordingly, CPIO, Sh. A. K. Assija is directed to revisit the matter and provide the information as sought, as per provisions of the RTI Act, 2005 within ten days of receipt of this order. No further intervention is required on the part of FAA in the matter. |
NA |
| 2488 |
CICOM/A/E/20/00135 |
Ms. ROOP AVTAR KAUR |
14-08-2020 |
On going through the RTI application, CPIO’s reply and First Appeal filed by the Appellant, it is observed that the Appellant, through his RTI application, has asked for copies of the documents/ records (in any form like hard copy, audio cassette etc.), on basis of that the order/observation was passed by the Information Commissioner in the Second Appeal No. CIC/IVTRI/A/2020/600445 of the Appellant.
It is important to note that under the provisions of Section 2(f) of the RTI Act, only such information, as is available and existing and held by the public authority or is under control of the public authoritycan be provided by a PIO. The PIO is also not required to interpret information or furnish replies to the hypothetical questions. Whatever the Appellant has asked for was construed as the interpretation of decision passed by the Commission and hence the reply given by CPIO which has been further clarified now by the Appellant in his First Appeal. Accordingly, CPIO, Sh. A. K. Assija is directed to revisit the matter and provide the information as sought, as per provisions of the RTI Act, 2005 within ten days of receipt of this order. No further intervention is required on the part of FAA in the matter. |
NA |
| 2489 |
CICOM/A/E/20/00134 |
Ms. ROOP AVTAR KAUR |
13-08-2020 |
On perusal of the Appeal, RTI application and reply of the CPIO, it is observed that the information given by CPIO, Sh. Ashok. Kr. Assija is as per provisions of the RTI Act, 2005, therefore, no further intervention is required on the part of FAA in the matter. |
NA |
| 2490 |
CICOM/A/E/20/00133 |
Ms. ROOP AVTAR KAUR |
13-08-2020 |
On perusal of the Appeal, RTI application and reply of the CPIO, it is observed that the information given by CPIO, Sh. C. Vinod babu is as per provisions of the RTI Act, 2005, therefore, no further intervention is required on the part of FAA in the matter. |
NA |