SNo. |
Registration No |
Appellate Authority Name |
Received date |
Reply Appeal |
Reply Doc |
2891 |
CICOM/A/2019/60121 |
AJITKUMAR VASANTRAO SONTAKKE |
25-07-2019 |
On perusal of the RTI application, CPIO’s reply and submissions made in the appeal, it is observed that reply furnished by the CPIO is appropriate and factual, therefore, no intervention is required on the part of the FAA, in the matter. |
NA |
2892 |
CICOM/A/2019/60118 |
AJITKUMAR VASANTRAO SONTAKKE |
25-07-2019 |
On perusal of the RTI application, CPIO’s reply and appeal, it is observed that as far as point-wise information furnished by the CPIO is concerned, there is no infirmity in the CPIO’s reply. The appellant in her appeal has requested to devise certain procedure. In this regard, appellant is advised to send her request/suggestions separately to the Commission. |
NA |
2893 |
CICOM/A/2019/60114 |
AJITKUMAR VASANTRAO SONTAKKE |
24-07-2019 |
On perusal of the RTI application, CPIO’s reply and submissions made in the appeal, it is observed that the reply furnished by the CPIO is appropriate, therefore, no intervention is required on the part of the FAA, in the matter. |
NA |
2894 |
CICOM/A/2019/00132 |
AJITKUMAR VASANTRAO SONTAKKE |
23-07-2019 |
please see the file |
|
2895 |
CICOM/A/2019/00135 |
AJITKUMAR VASANTRAO SONTAKKE |
23-07-2019 |
please see the file |
|
2896 |
CICOM/A/2019/00133 |
AJITKUMAR VASANTRAO SONTAKKE |
23-07-2019 |
please see the file |
|
2897 |
CICOM/A/2019/00134 |
AJITKUMAR VASANTRAO SONTAKKE |
23-07-2019 |
please see the file |
|
2898 |
CICOM/A/2019/60113 |
AJITKUMAR VASANTRAO SONTAKKE |
23-07-2019 |
In the appeal, appellant has stated the CPIO informed him that no submission made to the Commission by respondent through e-email is found in 29 files. In this regard, appellant has referred and attached an earlier CPIO’s reply No.CICOM/R/2017/50408/SH dated 11.07.2017 in which on Point 3, CPIO has accepted receiving of submission via email from CPIO, Chennai. There is contradiction in the reply of present CPIO, Shri R. Sitarama Murthy and the then CPIO, Shri Vijay Bhalla.
In the light of above, direction is given to Shri R.Sitarama Murthy, CPIO & DO to IC(SC) to re-visit the RTI application and provide factual information to the appellant within 2 (two) weeks from the date of receipt of the order. A copy of reply dated 11.07.2017 of the then CPIO, Shri Bhalla is enclosed. |
NA |
2899 |
CICOM/A/2019/60112 |
AJITKUMAR VASANTRAO SONTAKKE |
22-07-2019 |
On perusal of the RTI application, CPIOs reply and appeal, it is observed that appellant has not sought any specific information about specific diary numbers or appeals, therefore, reply furnished by the CPIO/Consultant(MR) seems to be appropriate. No further intervention is required on the part of the FAA, in the matter. |
NA |
2900 |
CICOM/A/2019/60106 |
AJITKUMAR VASANTRAO SONTAKKE |
21-07-2019 |
please see the file |
|