There are serious errors in your form submission, please see below for details.

Search RTI Appeal

List of RTI Appeal

SNo. Registration No Appellate Authority Name Received date Reply Appeal Reply Doc
2891 CICOM/A/2019/60121 AJITKUMAR VASANTRAO SONTAKKE 25-07-2019 On perusal of the RTI application, CPIO’s reply and submissions made in the appeal, it is observed that reply furnished by the CPIO is appropriate and factual, therefore, no intervention is required on the part of the FAA, in the matter. NA
2892 CICOM/A/2019/60118 AJITKUMAR VASANTRAO SONTAKKE 25-07-2019 On perusal of the RTI application, CPIO’s reply and appeal, it is observed that as far as point-wise information furnished by the CPIO is concerned, there is no infirmity in the CPIO’s reply. The appellant in her appeal has requested to devise certain procedure. In this regard, appellant is advised to send her request/suggestions separately to the Commission. NA
2893 CICOM/A/2019/60114 AJITKUMAR VASANTRAO SONTAKKE 24-07-2019 On perusal of the RTI application, CPIO’s reply and submissions made in the appeal, it is observed that the reply furnished by the CPIO is appropriate, therefore, no intervention is required on the part of the FAA, in the matter. NA
2894 CICOM/A/2019/00132 AJITKUMAR VASANTRAO SONTAKKE 23-07-2019 please see the file download pdf
2895 CICOM/A/2019/00135 AJITKUMAR VASANTRAO SONTAKKE 23-07-2019 please see the file download pdf
2896 CICOM/A/2019/00133 AJITKUMAR VASANTRAO SONTAKKE 23-07-2019 please see the file download pdf
2897 CICOM/A/2019/00134 AJITKUMAR VASANTRAO SONTAKKE 23-07-2019 please see the file download pdf
2898 CICOM/A/2019/60113 AJITKUMAR VASANTRAO SONTAKKE 23-07-2019 In the appeal, appellant has stated the CPIO informed him that no submission made to the Commission by respondent through e-email is found in 29 files. In this regard, appellant has referred and attached an earlier CPIO’s reply No.CICOM/R/2017/50408/SH dated 11.07.2017 in which on Point 3, CPIO has accepted receiving of submission via email from CPIO, Chennai. There is contradiction in the reply of present CPIO, Shri R. Sitarama Murthy and the then CPIO, Shri Vijay Bhalla. In the light of above, direction is given to Shri R.Sitarama Murthy, CPIO & DO to IC(SC) to re-visit the RTI application and provide factual information to the appellant within 2 (two) weeks from the date of receipt of the order. A copy of reply dated 11.07.2017 of the then CPIO, Shri Bhalla is enclosed. NA
2899 CICOM/A/2019/60112 AJITKUMAR VASANTRAO SONTAKKE 22-07-2019 On perusal of the RTI application, CPIOs reply and appeal, it is observed that appellant has not sought any specific information about specific diary numbers or appeals, therefore, reply furnished by the CPIO/Consultant(MR) seems to be appropriate. No further intervention is required on the part of the FAA, in the matter. NA
2900 CICOM/A/2019/60106 AJITKUMAR VASANTRAO SONTAKKE 21-07-2019 please see the file download pdf