| SNo. |
Registration No |
Appellate Authority Name |
Received date |
Reply Appeal |
Reply Doc |
| 3161 |
CICOM/A/2018/00271 |
AJITKUMAR VASANTRAO SONTAKKE |
17-12-2018 |
please see the file |
 |
| 3162 |
CICOM/A/2018/00272 |
AJITKUMAR VASANTRAO SONTAKKE |
17-12-2018 |
please see the file |
|
| 3163 |
CICOM/A/2018/00274 |
AJITKUMAR VASANTRAO SONTAKKE |
17-12-2018 |
please see the file |
|
| 3164 |
CICOM/A/2018/00273 |
AJITKUMAR VASANTRAO SONTAKKE |
17-12-2018 |
please see the file |
|
| 3165 |
CICOM/A/2018/60196 |
AJITKUMAR VASANTRAO SONTAKKE |
16-12-2018 |
The appellant has been contacted over his given mobile to explain but to no avail. However, on perusal of the RTI application, CPIO’s reply and appeal, it is observed that information furnished by the CPIO is appropriate. The appellant is advised to wait the turn of hearing of his 2nd appeal. |
NA |
| 3166 |
CICOM/A/2018/60195 |
AJITKUMAR VASANTRAO SONTAKKE |
16-12-2018 |
In the appeal, appellant has stated that enclosure of the letter dated 05.12.2018 has not been forwarded to him. The enclosure dated 05.12.2018 of the CPIO’s letter No.CICOM/R/2018/50907/CR-1 is attached herewith.
Appellant also mentioned other briefs of his grievances in the appeal. In this regard, it is to mention that FAA jurisdiction is limited to the RTI application and CPIO’s response on the RTI application. As far as reply of CPIOs is concerned, it is observed that appropriate and factual information has been provided by the CPIOs, therefore, no further intervention is required on the part of the FAA, in the matter. |
|
| 3167 |
CICOM/A/2018/60197 |
AJITKUMAR VASANTRAO SONTAKKE |
16-12-2018 |
Please see attachment. |
|
| 3168 |
CICOM/A/2018/60193 |
AJITKUMAR VASANTRAO SONTAKKE |
15-12-2018 |
please see the file |
|
| 3169 |
CICOM/A/2018/60194 |
AJITKUMAR VASANTRAO SONTAKKE |
15-12-2018 |
Please see attachment. |
|
| 3170 |
CICOM/A/2018/60192 |
AJITKUMAR VASANTRAO SONTAKKE |
14-12-2018 |
In the appeal, appellant has stated that the details of the appropriate public authority is not provided and requested for the same. In this regard, Shri TBJS Rajappa, CPIO, RTI Cell has been called who informed that information sought by the appellant is of general nature and not specific. As per Annual Report of 2016-17 of the Commission, there are 2092 public authorities and which is the appropriate authority for the appellant is not known, therefore, he was informed that in case any CPIO/PIO or any other official has leaked the information in violation to RTI Act, he may approach the concerned public authority for appropriate action against the individual. However, appellant may see the name of public authorities in the Annual Reports 2016-17 of the Commission under the link https://cic.gov.in/sites/default/files/Reports/CIC%20Annual%20Report%20English%202016-17.pdf
FAA is in agreement with the submissions of the CPIO. |
NA |