| SNo. |
Registration No |
Appellate Authority Name |
Received date |
Reply Appeal |
Reply Doc |
| 3391 |
CICOM/A/2018/00148 |
AJITKUMAR VASANTRAO SONTAKKE |
27-06-2018 |
please see the file |
 |
| 3392 |
CICOM/A/2018/00150 |
AJITKUMAR VASANTRAO SONTAKKE |
27-06-2018 |
please see the file |
|
| 3393 |
CICOM/A/2018/00151 |
AJITKUMAR VASANTRAO SONTAKKE |
27-06-2018 |
please see the file |
|
| 3394 |
CICOM/A/2018/60084 |
AJITKUMAR VASANTRAO SONTAKKE |
27-06-2018 |
On perusal of the RTI application, reply of the CPIO and appeal, it is observed that the appellant is not aggrieved with the reply of the CPIO, CIC but she is aggrieved with the order of the Commission in case file No.CIC/NCFWO/A/2017/607207 and CIC/MOWCD/A/2018/102543. As far as reply of the CPIOs is concerned, it is observed that the point-wise information furnished by the CPIOs is factual and appropriate. Moreover, CPIO as well FAA of the Commission cannot comment on the decision of the Commission. Therefore, no intervention is required on the part of the FAA, in the matter. |
NA |
| 3395 |
CICOM/A/2018/00152 |
AJITKUMAR VASANTRAO SONTAKKE |
27-06-2018 |
please see the file |
|
| 3396 |
CICOM/A/2018/00149 |
AJITKUMAR VASANTRAO SONTAKKE |
27-06-2018 |
please see the file |
|
| 3397 |
CICOM/A/2018/60083 |
AJITKUMAR VASANTRAO SONTAKKE |
26-06-2018 |
In the RTI application, appellant has sought following information:-
“Which ministry/department provides which official car to its offices of the rank of Joint Secretary, Additional Secretary and Secretary level officers. Please provide a list of official cars indicating which ministry/department has provided which official car to its officers of the rank of Joint Secretary, Additional Secretary and Secretary. Please specify the name of car also.
Shri S.K. Rabbani, CPIO & DS(GA) vide reply dated 26.06.18 has stated that “The information sought is not clear and specific.â€
In the appeal, appellant has stated that “The reply provided to my RTI application is avoided on the ground that the question is not clear and specific, whereas I specifically asked for the name of the car provided officially to the officers of Joint Secretary, Additional Secretary and Secretary rank for example Maruti Ciaz is given to an officer of Additional Secretary level of Government of India. Please provide the specific information in listed form as to which car/official vehicle is provided to the officers of Joint Secretary, Additional Secretary and Secretary rank in various ministries of Government of India.â€
From perusal of RTI application and submission made in the first appeal, it appears that appellant wants to know name of the cars included in the staff car list and a list of official car provided by Ministries/Department to its officers of Joint Secretary, Additional Secretary and Secretary. As far as list of cars included as staff car is concerned, this information may be available with Department of Expenditure, Ministry of Finance. Direction is accordingly given to Shri S.K. Rabbani, CPIO & DS(GA) to transfer the RTI application u/s 6(3) of the RTI Act to the Department of Expenditure, Ministry of Finance with a copy to the appellant within 5 days from the date of receipt of the order.
The list of official cars provided to Joint Secretary, Additional Secretary and Secretary of the Ministries/Departments is not maintained at this office, therefore, appellant is advised to approach the concerned Ministry/Department to get the information. |
NA |
| 3398 |
CICOM/A/2018/60082 |
AJITKUMAR VASANTRAO SONTAKKE |
23-06-2018 |
please see the file |
|
| 3399 |
CICOM/A/2018/60080 |
AJITKUMAR VASANTRAO SONTAKKE |
23-06-2018 |
On perusal of the RTI application, reply of the CPIO and appeal, it is observed that the appellant is aggrieved with the non-compliance of the Commission’s decision No.CIC/DSSSB/A/2017/608427 dated 20.03.2018 and the appellant brought to the notice of the CIC regarding the non-compliance of the orders of the IC(YA) on 22.05.2018 vide Diary No.132167. No action apparently has been taken on his petition/request regarding non-compliance. Instead of providing information regarding action taken on his non-compliance petition, Shri R.P. Grover, CPIO has transferred his RTI application u/s 6(3) to the respondent authority i.e. DSSSB, New Delhi, which shows that CPIO has not gone through the RTI application properly. In the appeal, appellant has stated that action should be taken by CIC for the non compliance of order by the DSSSB. Shri R.P. Grover, CPIO & DO to IC(YA) is accordingly directed to provide action taken on the non-compliance filed vide Dy.No.132167 dated 22.05.2018 to the appellant within 2 weeks from the date of receipt of the order. |
NA |
| 3400 |
CICOM/A/2018/60081 |
AJITKUMAR VASANTRAO SONTAKKE |
23-06-2018 |
On perusal of the RTI application, reply of the CPIO and appeal, it is observed that information furnished by the CPIO is factual and appropriate, therefore, no intervention is required on the part of the FAA, in the matter. |
NA |