There are serious errors in your form submission, please see below for details.

Search RTI Appeal

List of RTI Appeal

SNo. Registration No Appellate Authority Name Received date Reply Appeal Reply Doc
3401 CICOM/A/2018/00147 R K SINGH 22-06-2018 please see the file download pdf
3402 CICOM/A/2018/00145 AJITKUMAR VASANTRAO SONTAKKE 22-06-2018 please see the file download pdf
3403 CICOM/A/2018/00146 AJITKUMAR VASANTRAO SONTAKKE 22-06-2018 please see the file download pdf
3404 CICOM/A/2018/60079 AJITKUMAR VASANTRAO SONTAKKE 19-06-2018 In the appeal, appellant has requested for audio-conferencing over his mobile No.9560901490. Accordingly, the appellant was contacted on 20.06.2018 at 1100 hrs. The appellant has stated during the hearing that he aggrieved with the reply of CPIO on Point-5 of the RTI application as the CPIO has not provided the reasons for taking back ministries/departments from Hon’ble Information Commissioner, Shri M. Sridhar Acharyulu. Shri Jeewan Chandra, CPIO was called with requisite papers. On perusal of the requisite papers and information provided, it is observed that there is no “taking back Ministry/Department from the said Hon’ble Information Commissioner”. In fact, it is the work distribution done by the Commission from time to time. There is no reason available on the file. The Ministry/Department allotted from time to time related information has already been provided by the CPIO. Shri Jeewan Chandra, CPIO(MR) has exceeded to his authority in writing such factually not correct information that “As per RTI Act, the reason for taking back Ministries/Department may not be provided”. Shri Jeewan Chandra, CPIO (MR) is hereby ‘WARNED’ to be careful in dealing with the RTI application and ensure that only relevant information be furnished, in future. NA
3405 CICOM/A/2018/60078 AJITKUMAR VASANTRAO SONTAKKE 15-06-2018 In the RTI application, appellant has sought following information in respect of case File No.CIC/MP/A/2014/000332:- “a. Pl provide a copy of the intimation by NCW to CIC in compliance with direction of Fact Finding Committee per para no.7.8 of its report. b. If no intimation is received, please provide copy of letter sent by CIC to NCW since receipt of Fact Finding Report in October 2016. c. Information and supporting documents as regards action taken by CIC for non-compliance of the affidavit given by NCW to CIC in July 2015 that it will take disciplinary action on receipt of the case files.” Shri T.K. Mohapatra, CPIO & DO to IC(SA) has replied as under:- “…. Point a,b and c: The concerned case file which is available in the digitized form in the AppsCom of this Commission consists of 361 pages. It is not possible to identify and segregate the documents required by you from the voluminous documents. You may inspect the file and identify the document(s) as per your requiredment so that the copy fo the same can be provided or you may take copy of the whole file by depositing Rs.722/- @ Rs.2/- per page by Demand Draft, Postal Order or Bankers Cheque in favour of Pay and Account Officer, CAT payable at New Delhi.” Since appellant resides in Mumbai, therefore, she stated in the appeal that she is not in Delhi to take physical inspection and requested to direct the CPIO to upload the digitized 361 pages for online verification or send her the soft copy to identify the documents which she need and can apply per requisite fees to obtain certified copies. In case, this is not possible, then at the least to provide her the index of 361 pages showing the date of submission, name of party which submitted, no. of pages and title of the submission. In this regard, Shri T.K. Mohapatra, CPIO cum DO to IC(SA) has been called for and discussed the matter. Shri Mohapatra agreed to provide copy of complete case file to the appellant. Direction is accordingly given to Shri T.K. Mohapatra, CPIO cum DO to IC(SA) to provide copy of complete documents of digitized case File No.CIC/MP/A/2014/000332 to the appellant within 10 days from the date of receipt of the order. NA
3406 CICOM/A/2018/60077 R K SINGH 14-06-2018 In the appeal, appellant has requested for audio-conferencing over his mobile No.9560901490. Accordingly, the appellant was contacted on 20.06.2018 at 1100 hrs. The appellant stated during the hearing that on Point-1 of the RTI application, CPIO has provi NA
3407 CICOM/A/2018/00144 R K SINGH 14-06-2018 please see the file download pdf
3408 CICOM/A/2018/60075 AJITKUMAR VASANTRAO SONTAKKE 14-06-2018 In the appeal, appellant has requested for audio-conferencing over his mobile No.9560901490. Accordingly, the appellant was contacted on 20.06.2018 at 1100 hrs. On Point-1 of the RTI application, appellant has stated during the hearing that copy of the attendance sheet in case File Nos.CIC/NYUKS/C/2017/146410 & CIC/NYUKS/A/2017/144856 supplied to him, CPIO has not attested the same and also suppressed some information. Further, CPIO has not provided point-wise reply. Shri T.K. Mohapatra, CPIO has intimated that he only hide those part of the attendance sheet, which consists personal information and he has given point-wise reply of the RTI. On perusal of the RTI application and CPIO’s reply and submission made during audio-conference, it is observed that 1. CPIO has provided copy of attendance sheet but not certified. 2. For other points, the CPIO has provided factual and appropriate point-wise information to the appellant. Direction is given to Shri T.K. Mohapatra, CPIO & DO to IC(SA) to provide certified copy of attendance sheets as per DoPT OM No.10/1/2013-IR dated 06.10.2015 to the appellant by severing the personal information within 1 week from the date of receipt of the order. NA
3409 CICOM/A/2018/60074 AJITKUMAR VASANTRAO SONTAKKE 14-06-2018 please see the file download pdf
3410 CICOM/A/2018/00143 AJITKUMAR VASANTRAO SONTAKKE 14-06-2018 please see the file download pdf