| SNo. |
Registration No |
Appellate Authority Name |
Received date |
Reply Appeal |
Reply Doc |
| 3411 |
CICOM/A/2018/00140 |
AJITKUMAR VASANTRAO SONTAKKE |
14-06-2018 |
please see the file |
 |
| 3412 |
CICOM/A/2018/00141 |
AJITKUMAR VASANTRAO SONTAKKE |
14-06-2018 |
please see the file |
|
| 3413 |
CICOM/A/2018/60073 |
AJITKUMAR VASANTRAO SONTAKKE |
14-06-2018 |
In the appeal, appellant has stated that as per reply of CPIO, diary No.173942 dated 27.09.2016 was received in the registry of IC(YA) but same is not available in the complaint file, it might have been filed with another file, is misleading because practically it means that the said dak is missing from the registry/misplaced by the registry. This dak is closely related to 3 other daks received on the same date that resulted in initiation of a vigilance enquiry against CIC officials/rehearing of a 2nd appeal. Since the dak received vide diary No.173942 dated 27.09.2016 is missing/misplaced, the other responses of CPIO in relation to aforementioned dak diary number are just to create an illusion that information has been provided.
In view of the above, direction is given to Shri R.P. Grover, CPIO & DO to IC(YA) to search the dak diarized vide Dy.No.173942 dated 27.09.2016 and provide appropriate reply of the information sought to the appellant within 10 days from the date of receipt of the order. |
NA |
| 3414 |
CICOM/A/2018/60071 |
AJITKUMAR VASANTRAO SONTAKKE |
08-06-2018 |
On perusal of the RTI application, reply of the CPIO and appeal, it is observed that information sought on Points 1 & 2 of the RTI application are same and reply furnished by the CPIO is appropriate. As regards information sought on Points 3 & 4 of the RTI application, direction is given to Shri Krishan Avtar Talwar, CPIO & DS to Central Registry-I to collect information from all the registries u/s 5(4) and provide a composite reply to the appellant within 10 working days from the date of receipt of the order. |
NA |
| 3415 |
CICOM/A/2018/00138 |
R K SINGH |
06-06-2018 |
please see the file |
|
| 3416 |
CICOM/A/2018/00139 |
R K SINGH |
06-06-2018 |
please see the file |
|
| 3417 |
CICOM/A/2018/00137 |
AJITKUMAR VASANTRAO SONTAKKE |
06-06-2018 |
please see the file |
|
| 3418 |
CICOM/A/2018/60070 |
AJITKUMAR VASANTRAO SONTAKKE |
06-06-2018 |
In the RTI application, appellant has sought certified copy of the proof of dispatch of the Notice of Hearing in case File No.CIC/MOEAF/A/2016/298594. Shri S.C. Sharma, CPIO vide letter dated has responded that “As per the CIC website (copy enclosed), the notice was sent to the CPIO by speed post. The Bar code is: ED369372543IN.â€
In the appeal, the appellant has stated that documents provided by the CPIO are not properly certified. The CPIO should have provided true copy of the documents as per DoPT OM No.10/1/2013-IR dated 06.10.2015. In this regard, it is to mention that the CPIO has provided desired document as downloaded from the CIC’s website, which is already available in public domain. The CPIO can provide true copy of those documents, which are available on his record. Therefore, there is no infirmity in the reply of the CPIO. Hence, no action is required on the part of the FAA. |
NA |
| 3419 |
CICOM/A/2018/60069 |
AJITKUMAR VASANTRAO SONTAKKE |
05-06-2018 |
At point-4 of the appeal, appellant has stated that:-
“Through this appeal, I am not approaching the FAA for a decision on CPIO reply but a sincere request to apprise the top most authority on RTI i.e. CIC himself about the sentiments of the citizen about the eroding values of the commission in the public eye.â€
On perusal of the RTI application and reply thereof by CPIO, it is observed that reply of the CPIO is appropriate.
Since the appellant is not aggrieved with the CPIO’s reply, no action is required on the part of the FAA. |
NA |
| 3420 |
CICOM/A/2018/60068 |
R K SINGH |
04-06-2018 |
please see the file |
|