SNo. |
Registration No |
Appellate Authority Name |
Received date |
Reply Appeal |
Reply Doc |
551 |
CICOM/A/P/24/00068 |
Ms. ROOP AVTAR KAUR |
07-06-2024 |
आर. टी. आई. आवेदन, पà¥à¤°à¤¦à¤¾à¤¨ की गई सूचना à¤à¤µà¤‚ पà¥à¤°à¤¥à¤® अपील का अवलोकन करने पर पाया गया कि अपीलकरà¥à¤¤à¤¾ के आर.टी.आई. आवेदन सं. CICOM/R/P/24/00184 के पà¥à¤°à¤¤à¤¿à¤‰à¤¤à¥à¤¤à¤° में केंदà¥à¤°à¥€à¤¯ जन सूचना अधिकारी दà¥à¤µà¤¾à¤°à¤¾ पà¥à¤°à¥‡à¤·à¤¿à¤¤ की गई सूचना, सूचना का अधिकार अधिनियम के पà¥à¤°à¤¾à¤µà¤§à¤¾à¤¨à¥‹à¤‚ à¤à¤µà¤‚ मांगी गई सूचना के अनà¥à¤¸à¤¾à¤° ही है। अतः केंदà¥à¤°à¥€à¤¯ जन सूचना अधिकारी दà¥à¤µà¤¾à¤°à¤¾ पà¥à¤°à¤¦à¤¾à¤¨ की गई सूचना तथà¥à¤¯à¤¾à¤¤à¥à¤®à¤• है और इसमें पà¥à¤°à¤¥à¤® अपीलीय अधिकारी के हसà¥à¤¤à¤•à¥à¤·à¥‡à¤ª की कोई आवशà¥à¤¯à¤•ता नहीं है। |
NA |
552 |
CICOM/A/E/24/00189 |
Brig. VIPIN CHAKRAWARTI |
07-06-2024 |
The First Appeal, RTI application and reply given by CPIO of CIC have been perused.
As per Section 2(f) of the RTI Act, 2005 only such information as is available and existing and held by the public authority or is under control of the public authority can be provided by a PIO. The PIO is not supposed to create or collate information that is not a part of the record.
Accordingly, the reply given by the CPIO is appropriate and as per the provisions of the RTI
Act, 2005. Hence, no intervention is required on behalf of the FAA in this matter. |
NA |
553 |
CICOM/A/P/24/00067 |
Ms. ROOP AVTAR KAUR |
06-06-2024 |
Ref RTI No.- CICOM/R/P/24/00161
DECISION OF FIRST APPELLATE AUTHORITY:
The First Appeal, RTI application and reply given by CPIO of CIC have been perused.
As per Section 2(f) of the RTI Act, 2005 only such information as is available and existing and held by the public authority or is under control of the public authority can be provided by a PIO. The PIO is not supposed to create or collate information that is not a part of the record.
In the instant case, the CPIO furnished reply to the RTI application on 27.05.2024 i.e. within the prescribed time limit as per the provisions of the RTI Act, 2005, but as mentioned by the appellant in the first appeal of non-receipt of the reply, a copy of the RTI reply is being attached with this order.
Accordingly, the reply given by the CPIO is appropriate and as per the provisions of the RTI Act, 2005. Hence, no intervention is required on behalf of the FAA in this matter.
The appeal is disposed of accordingly. |
NA |
554 |
CICOM/A/E/24/00188 |
Ms. ROOP AVTAR KAUR |
06-06-2024 |
Ref RTI No. - CICOM/R/E/24/00644
GROUNDS FOR FIRST APPEAL:
The Appellant submitted first appeal stating that
"The information furnished by the CPIO dated 29/5/2024 is incomplete, please provide factual information."
DECISION OF FIRST APPELLATE AUTHORITY:
The First Appeal, RTI application and reply given by CPIO of CIC have been perused.
It is the duty of every Public Authority to designate Public Information Officers in its administrative units or offices. The details in this respect may be referred from Section 5 of the RTI Act, 2005.
Hence, no intervention is required on behalf of the FAA in this matter.
The appeal is disposed of accordingly. |
NA |
555 |
CICOM/A/P/24/00066 |
Brig. VIPIN CHAKRAWARTI |
06-06-2024 |
Please see the file. |
|
556 |
CICOM/A/E/24/00187 |
Brig. VIPIN CHAKRAWARTI |
05-06-2024 |
On perusal of the online Appeal, RTI application and reply of the CPIO, it is observed that the information given by the CPIO is as per provisions of the RTI Act, 2005. Therefore, no further intervention is required on the part of FAA in the matter. |
NA |
557 |
CICOM/A/P/24/00064 |
Ms. ROOP AVTAR KAUR |
04-06-2024 |
Ref RTI No.- CICOM/R/P/24/00169
DECISION OF FIRST APPELLATE AUTHORITY:
The First Appeal, RTI application and reply given by CPIO of CIC have been perused.
As per Section 2(f) of the RTI Act, 2005 only such information as is available and existing and held by the public authority or is under control of the public authority can be provided by a PIO. The PIO is not supposed to create or collate information that is not a part of the record.
Accordingly, the reply given by the CPIO is appropriate and as per the provisions of the RTI Act, 2005. Hence, no intervention is required on behalf of the FAA in this matter.
The appeal is disposed of accordingly. |
NA |
558 |
CICOM/A/P/24/00065 |
Brig. VIPIN CHAKRAWARTI |
04-06-2024 |
Please see the file. |
|
559 |
CICOM/A/E/24/00186 |
Brig. VIPIN CHAKRAWARTI |
03-06-2024 |
The First Appeal, RTI application and reply given by CPIO of CIC have been perused.
As per Section 2(f) of the RTI Act, 2005 only such information as is available and existing and held by the public authority or is under control of the public authority can be provided by a PIO. The PIO is not supposed to create or collate information that is not a part of the record.
Accordingly, the reply given by the CPIO is appropriate and as per the provisions of the RTI
Act, 2005. Hence, no intervention is required on behalf of the FAA in this matter. |
NA |
560 |
CICOM/A/P/24/00063 |
Brig. VIPIN CHAKRAWARTI |
30-05-2024 |
Please see the file. |
|