| SNo. |
Registration No |
Appellate Authority Name |
Received date |
Reply Appeal |
Reply Doc |
| 571 |
CICOM/A/E/24/00179 |
Brig. VIPIN CHAKRAWARTI |
24-05-2024 |
On perusal of the online Appeal, RTI application and reply of the CPIO, it is observed that the information given by the CPIO is as per provisions of the RTI Act, 2005. Therefore, no further intervention is required on the part of FAA in the matter. |
NA |
| 572 |
CICOM/A/P/24/00058 |
Brig. VIPIN CHAKRAWARTI |
22-05-2024 |
Please see the file. |
 |
| 573 |
CICOM/A/E/24/00177 |
Brig. VIPIN CHAKRAWARTI |
22-05-2024 |
On perusal of the online Appeal, RTI application and reply of the CPIO, it is observed that the information given by the CPIO is as per provisions of the RTI Act, 2005. Therefore, no further intervention is required on the part of FAA in the matter. |
NA |
| 574 |
CICOM/A/E/24/00176 |
Brig. VIPIN CHAKRAWARTI |
22-05-2024 |
The First Appeal, RTI application and reply given by CPIO of CIC have been perused.
As per Section 2(f) of the RTI Act, 2005 only such information as is available and existing and held by the public authority or is under control of the public authority can be provided by a PIO. The PIO is not supposed to create or collate information that is not a part of the record.
Accordingly, the reply given by the CPIO is appropriate and as per the provisions of the RTI
Act, 2005. Hence, no intervention is required on behalf of the FAA in this matter. |
NA |
| 575 |
CICOM/A/E/24/00178 |
Brig. VIPIN CHAKRAWARTI |
22-05-2024 |
On perusal of the online Appeal, RTI application and reply of the CPIO, it is observed that the information given by the CPIO is as per provisions of the RTI Act, 2005. Therefore, no further intervention is required on the part of FAA in the matter. |
NA |
| 576 |
CICOM/A/E/24/00175 |
Brig. VIPIN CHAKRAWARTI |
21-05-2024 |
On perusal of the Appeal, RTI application and reply of the CPIO, it is observed that no information has been given by the CPIO for point’s no. 10, 12 & 13 of the RTI application No CICOM/R/E/24/00496/1. Accordingly, Nodal CPIO is direct to obtain the required information from the concerned CPIO and send the same to the applicant within 10 days of receipt of the order free of cost. |
NA |
| 577 |
CICOM/A/E/24/00174 |
Ms. ROOP AVTAR KAUR |
21-05-2024 |
Ref RTI No. - CICOM/R/E/24/00647
GROUNDS FOR FIRST APPEAL:
The Appellant submitted first appeal stating that
"tHE CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION IS A STATUTORY BODY TO ENSURE TRANSPARENCY AND ACCOUNTABILITY OF THE PUBLIC AUTHORITIES. sINCE THE HONORABLE DELHI HIGH COURT SERVED THE INTERM STAY ORDER ON CIC , THEY HAVE TO BRING THE FACTS AND NON APPLICABILITY OF THE INTERM STAY ORDER TO THE HONORABLE COURT. More the petitioner had made allegations on the part of the CIC and the same had to be replied to by the CIC and the RTI applicant cannot step into the shoes of the CIC and reply the allegations leveled against the CIC. the CIC cannot sit as a mute spectator. in view of this preferred the appeal with a request to submit their counter to the Delhi High Court by seeking a copy of the writ petitions for the allegations levelled against CIC by the petitioners."
DECISION OF FIRST APPELLATE AUTHORITY:
The First Appeal, RTI application and reply given by CPIO of CIC have been perused.
As per Section 2(f) of the RTI Act, 2005 only such information as is available and existing and held by the public authority or is under control of the public authority can be provided by a PIO. The PIO is not supposed to create or collate information that is not a part of the record.
Accordingly, the reply given by the CPIO is appropriate and as per the provisions of the RTI Act, 2005. Hence, no intervention is required on behalf of the FAA in this matter.
The appeal is disposed of accordingly. |
NA |
| 578 |
CICOM/A/E/24/00173 |
Brig. VIPIN CHAKRAWARTI |
20-05-2024 |
The First Appeal, RTI application and reply given by CPIO of CIC have been perused.
As per Section 2(f) of the RTI Act, 2005 only such information as is available and existing and held by the public authority or is under control of the public authority can be provided by a PIO. The PIO is not supposed to create or collate information that is not a part of the record.
Accordingly, the reply given by the CPIO is appropriate and as per the provisions of the RTI
Act, 2005. Hence, no intervention is required on behalf of the FAA in this matter. |
NA |
| 579 |
CICOM/A/E/24/00172 |
Ms. ROOP AVTAR KAUR |
19-05-2024 |
Ref RTI No. - CICOM/R/E/24/00482
GROUNDS FOR FIRST APPEAL:
The Appellant submitted first appeal stating that
"the information sought was year wise appeal before CIC i.e. 2nd appeal against decision taken of CPSE, department of government of India and CVC; the information was sought year wise and organization wise, which means in each year how many 2nd appeal was received by CIC against CPSE, CVC and ministry of government of India; information provided against point no-1 is not in line and also vague; against point no-4 and 5, it has been rejected on the ground that no complied information is available; it is shocking as far as CIC is concerned; it is the obligation on PA to maintain the records to facilitate the information- sec-4(1)(a); it is true that CIC publishes the annual report; how the annual report is prepared? definitely based on raw information and then complied to the form of annual report? how could PIO tell that no compiled information is available? if it would the answer of CIC, where the applicant would go? i request you to provide the information"
DECISION OF FIRST APPELLATE AUTHORITY:
The First Appeal, RTI application and reply given by CPIO of CIC have been perused.
As per Section 2(f) of the RTI Act, 2005 only such information as is available and existing and held by the public authority or is under control of the public authority can be provided by a PIO. The PIO is not supposed to create or collate information that is not a part of the record.
Accordingly, the reply given by the CPIO is appropriate and as per the provisions of the RTI Act,2005. Hence, no intervention is required on behalf of the FAA in this matter.
The appeal is disposed of accordingly. |
NA |
| 580 |
CICOM/A/E/24/00171 |
Brig. VIPIN CHAKRAWARTI |
16-05-2024 |
On perusal of the online Appeal, RTI application and reply of the CPIO, it is observed that the information given by the CPIO is as per provisions of the RTI Act, 2005. Therefore, no further intervention is required on the part of FAA in the matter. |
NA |