| SNo. |
Registration No |
Appellate Authority Name |
Received date |
Reply Appeal |
Reply Doc |
| 581 |
CICOM/A/E/24/00165 |
Brig. VIPIN CHAKRAWARTI |
15-05-2024 |
On perusal of the Appeal, RTI application and reply of the CPIO, it is observed that the information not given by the CPIO for points 1 of the RTI application No. CICOM/R/E/24/00437 is not as per the provisions of RTI Act, 2005. Accordingly, direction is being given to DR to IC (VT) CPIO, to revisit the matter and provide complete and appropriate information within 10 days of receipt of this order, as per provisions of RTI Act, 2005. |
NA |
| 582 |
CICOM/A/E/24/00166 |
Brig. VIPIN CHAKRAWARTI |
15-05-2024 |
On perusal of the online Appeal, RTI application and reply of the CPIO, it is observed that the information given by the CPIO is as per provisions of the RTI Act, 2005. Therefore, no further intervention is required on the part of FAA in the matter. |
NA |
| 583 |
CICOM/A/E/24/00169 |
Ms. ROOP AVTAR KAUR |
15-05-2024 |
Ref RTI No. - CICOM/R/E/24/00516
GROUNDS FOR FIRST APPEAL:
The Appellant submitted first appeal stating that
"APPEAL AGAINST CRYPTIC COMMENT THAT IS INCOMPREHENSIBLE (UNRELATED TO DISCLOSURE u/s 4) CONTEXT: My 2nd Appeal No. CIC/CICOM/A/2022/663553 for direction to publish the powers and duties of all nodal officers in CIC was disposed of by Order dated 21/12/2023 advising CIC Secretary to look into the matter of updating the disclosure u/s 4 on CIC website. I had sent, by email and by speed-post, a letter dated 03.01.2024 on the subject of the said Order requesting the Secretary CIC to have the powers and duties of all nodal officers of CIC published u/s 4(1)(b)(ii) of RTI Act. The information was not published. The decision / reason for the decision to reject my request was not intimated. FACTS: On 15.04.2024 I made RTI Online request No. CICOM/R/E/24/00516 for detailed information of all of any actions taken on: (1) the email that I had sent at 10:26 PM on 05.01.2024 to secy-cic@nic.in (2) the speed-post ED522240094IN that was delivered in CIC at 1:12 PM on 05.01.2024 Point no. 2 was separately disposed of, as No. CICOM/R/E/24/00516/1, by CPIO I/c Dak Section (and I am filing separate appeal in respect of it). No. CICOM/R/E/24/00516 was disposed of by letter dated 14.05.2023 of Admin Section CPIO, saying: The email dated 5/1/2024 has been marked to the concerned task holder as per the channel. GROUNDS: A. I have specifically sought DETAILED information of ALL actions taken on the email that I sent to secy-cic@nic.in. CPIO has neither informed ALL Actions nor provided any DETAILS (e.g., when and by whom my email was opened and read, printed and put up / electronically forwarded for any further action taken / not taken, if it was archived or deleted.) B. CPIO has, instead, cryptically commented about a marking to TASK HOLDER as per CHANNEL. I am not able to access on CIC website the current publication u/s 4(1)(b)(iii) of channels. (Printout is attached of the error message: The requested page could not be found). In the previous publication, of which I have a downloaded copy, I find neither CHANNEL nor TASK HOLDER for correspondence related to advice issued to CIC Secretary in an Order of the Commission. REQUEST: I may please be provided the requested detailed information of action taken on my email (by way of, e.g., printout(s) from the secy-cic@nic.in email account and copies of any physical marking(s) or noting(s) relating to it). The TASK HOLDER and CHANNEL mentioned by CPIO may also please be comprehensibly informed. "
DECISION OF FIRST APPELLATE AUTHORITY:
The First Appeal, RTI application and reply given by CPIO of CIC have been perused.
Suo-motu disclosure u/s 4(1)(b)(ii) has been updated on the CIC website.
The appeal is disposed of accordingly. |
NA |
| 584 |
CICOM/A/E/24/00170 |
Brig. VIPIN CHAKRAWARTI |
15-05-2024 |
On perusal of the online Appeal, RTI application and reply of the CPIO, it is observed that the information given by the CPIO is as per provisions of the RTI Act, 2005. Therefore, no further intervention is required on the part of FAA in the matter. |
NA |
| 585 |
CICOM/A/E/24/00168 |
Brig. VIPIN CHAKRAWARTI |
15-05-2024 |
On perusal of the online Appeal, RTI application and reply of the CPIO, it is observed that the information given by the CPIO is as per provisions of the RTI Act, 2005. Therefore, no further intervention is required on the part of FAA in the matter. |
NA |
| 586 |
CICOM/A/E/24/00167 |
Brig. VIPIN CHAKRAWARTI |
15-05-2024 |
On perusal of the Online Appeal, RTI application and reply of the CPIO, it is observed that the information given by the CPIO for the RTI application No CICOM/R/E/24/00515 is not as per the provision or RTI Act, 2005. Accordingly, direction is being given to CPIO, (RTI Cell) to revisit the matter and provide complete appropriate information within 10 days of receipt of this order. |
NA |
| 587 |
CICOM/A/P/24/00056 |
Brig. VIPIN CHAKRAWARTI |
14-05-2024 |
Please see the file. |
 |
| 588 |
CICOM/A/P/24/00057 |
Brig. VIPIN CHAKRAWARTI |
14-05-2024 |
Please see the file. |
|
| 589 |
CICOM/A/E/24/00164 |
Brig. VIPIN CHAKRAWARTI |
14-05-2024 |
On perusal of the online Appeal, RTI application and reply of the CPIO, it is observed that the information given by the CPIO is as per provisions of the RTI Act, 2005. Therefore, no further intervention is required on the part of FAA in the matter. |
NA |
| 590 |
CICOM/A/E/24/00163 |
Brig. VIPIN CHAKRAWARTI |
14-05-2024 |
On perusal of the online Appeal, RTI application and reply of the CPIO, it is observed that the information given by the CPIO is as per provisions of the RTI Act, 2005. Therefore, no further intervention is required on the part of FAA in the matter. |
NA |