SNo. |
Registration No |
Appellate Authority Name |
Received date |
Reply Appeal |
Reply Doc |
831 |
CICOM/A/P/23/00193 |
Ms. ROOP AVTAR KAUR |
06-12-2023 |
आर.टी.आई. आवेदन, पà¥à¤°à¤¦à¤¾à¤¨ की गई सूचना à¤à¤µà¤‚ पà¥à¤°à¤¥à¤® अपील का अवलोकन किया गया, कि केंदà¥à¤°à¥€à¤¯ जन सूचना अधिकारी ने अपीलकरà¥à¤¤à¤¾ को पतà¥à¤° दिनांकित 24.08.2023 से संबंधित 06 बिंदà¥à¤“ं पर कोई सूचना पà¥à¤°à¥‡à¤·à¤¿à¤¤ नहीं करवाई गई है, अतः केंदà¥à¤°à¥€à¤¯ जन सूचना अधिकारी को निरà¥à¤¦à¥‡à¤¶ दिया जाता है कि इस आदेश के पà¥à¤°à¤¾à¤ªà¥à¤¤à¤¿ के दस दिन के à¤à¥€à¤¤à¤° दिनांक 04.01.2024 तक आर.टी.आई. आवेदन सं. CICOM/R/P/23/00604 के तहत मांगी गई सूचना का अवलोकन कर अपीलकरà¥à¤¤à¤¾ को पà¥à¤¨à¤ƒ सà¥à¤ªà¤·à¥à¤Ÿ सूचना पà¥à¤°à¥‡à¤·à¤¿à¤¤ की जाये। |
NA |
832 |
CICOM/A/E/23/00420 |
Ms. ROOP AVTAR KAUR |
04-12-2023 |
Ref RTI No. - CICOM/R/E/23/01196
GROUNDS FOR FIRST APPEAL:
The Appellant submitted first appeal stating that no reply received till date.
DECISION OF FIRST APPELLATE AUTHORITY:
The First Appeal, RTI application and reply given by CPIO of CIC have been perused.
In the instant case, the CPIO has already replied to the RTI application on 14.12.2023.
Accordingly, the reply given by the CPIO is appropriate and as per the provisions of the RTI Act,2005. Hence, no intervention is required on behalf of the FAA in this matter.
The appeal is disposed of accordingly. |
NA |
833 |
CICOM/A/P/23/00192 |
Ms. ROOP AVTAR KAUR |
04-12-2023 |
आर.टी.आई. आवेदन, पà¥à¤°à¤¦à¤¾à¤¨ की गई सूचना à¤à¤µà¤‚ पà¥à¤°à¤¥à¤® अपील का अवलोकन किया गया, अतः केंदà¥à¤°à¥€à¤¯ जन सूचना अधिकारी को निरà¥à¤¦à¥‡à¤¶ दिया जाता है कि इस आदेश के पà¥à¤°à¤¾à¤ªà¥à¤¤à¤¿ के दस दिन के à¤à¥€à¤¤à¤° दिनांक 18.12.2023 तक आर.टी.आई. आवेदन सं. CICOM/R/P/23/00597 के तहत मांगी गई सूचना का अवलोकन कर अपीलकरà¥à¤¤à¤¾ को पà¥à¤¨à¤ƒ सà¥à¤ªà¤·à¥à¤Ÿ सूचना पà¥à¤°à¥‡à¤·à¤¿à¤¤ की जाये। |
NA |
834 |
CICOM/A/E/23/00418 |
Ms. ROOP AVTAR KAUR |
03-12-2023 |
Ref RTI No. - CICOM/R/E/23/01146
GROUNDS FOR FIRST APPEAL:
The Appellant submitted first appeal stating that
"Dear First Appellate Authority, Aggrieved by the reply of the CPIO/deemed CPIOs w.r.t. my RTI application CICOM/R/E/23/01146, I hereby file a first appeal under section 19(1) of the RTI Act. In response to point 1 of my application, with respect to IC(HS) and IC(SP) the information has been stated to be NIL. However, w.r.t. IC(SC) the information has been said to be not maintained in the form sought by me. There is no reply with respect to any other registries. In response to point 2, the information has been said to be not maintained. My respectful submission is that section 4(1)(a) of the RTI Act mandates, inter alia, that every public authority maintains all its records duly catalogued and indexed in a manner and the form which facilitates the right to information under the RTI Act. In the light of this provision, I urge you to kindly direct the concerned officers to please provide the information sought by me. I shall be grateful to you for this kindness."
DECISION OF FIRST APPELLATE AUTHORITY:
The First Appeal, RTI application and reply given by CPIO of CIC have been perused.
As per Section 2(f) of the RTI Act, 2005 only such information as is available and existing and held by the public authority or is under control of the public authority can be provided by a PIO. The PIO is not supposed to create or collate information that is not a part of the record.
Accordingly, the reply given by the CPIO is appropriate and as per the provisions of the RTI Act,2005. Hence, no intervention is required on behalf of the FAA in this matter.
The appeal is disposed of accordingly. |
NA |
835 |
CICOM/A/E/23/00419 |
Ms. ROOP AVTAR KAUR |
03-12-2023 |
Ref RTI No. - CICOM/R/E/23/01165
GROUNDS FOR FIRST APPEAL:
The Appellant submitted first appeal stating that
"Dear First Appellate Authority, Aggrieved by the reply of the CPIO/deemed CPIOs w.r.t. my RTI application CICOM/R/E/23/01165, I hereby file a first appeal under section 19(1) of the RTI Act. In response to point 1 of my application, I have been asked to refer to the annual reports of CIC. My respectful submission is that the annual reports do not contain the information sought by me in the desired form. In response to point 2 and 3, the information has been said to be not maintained by CIC. My respectful submission is that section 4(1)(a) of the RTI Act mandates, inter alia, that every public authority maintains all its records duly catalogued and indexed in a manner and the form which facilitates the right to information under the RTI Act . Further, section 7(9) of the Act provides that information should ordinarily be provided in the form in which it is sought. In the light of these provisions, I urge you to 1. kindly direct the concerned officers to please provide the information sought by me in point 1 in any of the specified format i.e. .xls, .xlsx, .ods, .txt, or .csv 2. kindly direct the concerned officers to please provide the information sought by me in points 2 and 3 of the application. I shall be grateful to you for this kindness."
DECISION OF FIRST APPELLATE AUTHORITY:
The First Appeal, RTI application and reply given by CPIO of CIC have been perused.
As per Section 2(f) of the RTI Act, 2005 only such information as is available and existing and held by the public authority or is under control of the public authority can be provided by a PIO. The PIO is not supposed to create or collate information that is not a part of the record.
Accordingly, the reply given by the CPIO is appropriate and as per the provisions of the RTI Act,2005. Hence, no intervention is required on behalf of the FAA in this matter.
The appeal is disposed of accordingly. |
NA |
836 |
CICOM/A/E/23/00417 |
Ms. ROOP AVTAR KAUR |
01-12-2023 |
Ref RTI No. - CICOM/R/E/23/01220
GROUNDS FOR FIRST APPEAL:
The Appellant submitted first appeal stating that no response given within time limit.
DECISION OF FIRST APPELLATE AUTHORITY:
The First Appeal, RTI application and reply given by CPIO of CIC have been perused.
In the instant case, the CPIO has replied to the RTI application on 14.12.2023.
Accordingly, the reply given by the CPIO is appropriate and as per the provisions of the RTI Act,2005. Hence, no intervention is required on behalf of the FAA in this matter.
The appeal is disposed of accordingly. |
NA |
837 |
CICOM/A/P/23/00191 |
Ms. ROOP AVTAR KAUR |
29-11-2023 |
आर.टी.आई. आवेदन, पà¥à¤°à¤¦à¤¾à¤¨ की गई सूचना à¤à¤µà¤‚ पà¥à¤°à¤¥à¤® अपील का अवलोकन करने पर पाया गया कि अपीलकरà¥à¤¤à¤¾ के आर.टी.आई. आवेदन सं. CICOM/R/P/23/00603 में सूचना मांगी थी जिसके पà¥à¤°à¤¤à¤¿à¤‰à¤¤à¥à¤¤à¤° में केंदà¥à¤°à¥€à¤¯ जन सूचना अधिकारी दà¥à¤µà¤¾à¤°à¤¾ पà¥à¤°à¥‡à¤·à¤¿à¤¤ की गई सूचना, सूचना का अधिकार अधिनियम के पà¥à¤°à¤¾à¤µà¤§à¤¾à¤¨à¥‹à¤‚ à¤à¤µà¤‚ मांगी गई सूचना के अनà¥à¤¸à¤¾à¤° ही है। अतः केंदà¥à¤°à¥€à¤¯ जन सूचना अधिकारी दà¥à¤µà¤¾à¤°à¤¾ पà¥à¤°à¤¦à¤¾à¤¨ की गई सूचना तथà¥à¤¯à¤¾à¤¤à¥à¤®à¤• है और इसमें पà¥à¤°à¤¥à¤® अपीलीय अधिकारी के हसà¥à¤¤à¤•à¥à¤·à¥‡à¤ª की कोई आवशà¥à¤¯à¤•ता नहीं है। |
NA |
838 |
CICOM/A/E/23/00416 |
Ms. ROOP AVTAR KAUR |
29-11-2023 |
Ref RTI No. - CICOM/R/E/23/01095
GROUNDS FOR FIRST APPEAL:
The Appellant submitted first appeal stating that
"A: INTERIM RELIEF SOUGHT: Kindly transfer this appeal and underlying RTI request to Railway, CBI and CVC w.r.t CVC Complaint 38583/2023 dated 29/11/2023 B. GROUNDS FOR APPEAL: No response within time limits C. FACTS: Kindly note following RTI request (edited/updated text) CICOM/R/E/23/01095 dated 21/09/2023 CBA: REQUEST FOR INFORMATION FROM PIO OF INFORMATION COMMISSIONER MS SAROJ PUNHANI U/S 7(1) OF RTI ACT CONCERNING LIFE AND LIBERTY OF APPLICANT TO BE REPLIED WITHIN 48 HOURS (i) Kindly inform action taken and date of action taken on email dated 20/09/2023 sent to punhanis@cic.nic.in with the subject - Hearing held on 20/09/2023 w.r.t 2 cases (CEA and CBI), 7 complaints registered online with CIC in December 2013 with signed copy sent by speed post and with email praveenpoddar@outlook.com (ii) Kindly provide certified copy of email intimation w.r.t hearing held on 20/09/2023 w.r.t CIC file no. CIC/CBRUI/A/2022/605866. The postal copy apparently sent at the earlier address of applicant were apparently returned by the office of DyCEE/PRS (iii) Kindly provide certified copy of refusal to receive the hearing notice w.r.t file no. . CIC/CBRUI/A/2022/605866 and CIC/CEATY/A/2022/610551 by office of DyCEE/PRS (iv) Kindly transfer the RTI request under 9 series to Railway, CBI, CVC (w.r.t CVC Complaint 28691/2023 dated 20/09/2023) and Department of Posts so that related and updated information can be provided by their PIOs CB. REASONS FOR URGENCY (i) On 10/05/2023, the applicant has been fraudulently retired from Eastern Railway. So with criminal intentions, postal letters sent at the earlier address of applicant are not being received. In this regard, Principal Chief Commercial Manager of Eastern Railway Sh Soumitra Mazumdar has been informed on 20/09/2023 through Whatsapp message seen by him. Against him, CVC Complaint 30/01/2023 referred by CVC to CBI was given delayed response by CBI/Kolkata in May 2023 after fraudulent retirement of applicant. CVC Complaint 21211/2023 dated 12/07/2023 against HoZ/CBI/Kolkata referred to CVO/CBI in August 2023 was rejected/filed by CVO/CBI in September 2023. On 05/09/2023, Sh C A Joseph Dy Registrar/CIC issued hearing notice w.r.t file no. CIC/CBRUI/A/2022/605866 (ii) Kindly note the following RTI request dated 27/04/2023 disposed of online on 10/08/2023 by CIC CICOM/R/E/23/00435/2 dated 27/04/2023 CBA. REQUEST FOR INFORMATION FROM PIO OF CIC SH Y K SINHA: Kindly inform the status of compliance with the decision dated 15/03/2023 of IC Sh Uday Mahurkar w.r.t Second Appeal No. CIC/SORLY/A/2022/605498-UM meant for compliance within one month. Status REQUEST DISPOSED OF as on 10/08/2023 Status REQUEST TRANSFERRED TO OTHER CPIO as on 21/09/2023 Date of Action 21/09/2023 Remarks Details of CPIO :- Name:-DO TO IC (UM) - Rakesh Kumar Rao, Telephone Number:- 01126182598, Email Id:- drtoic8@cic.nic.in"
DECISION OF FIRST APPELLATE AUTHORITY:
The First Appeal, RTI application and reply given by CPIO of CIC have been perused.
In the instant case, CPIO (DR to IC-VT) is directed to reply to the RTI application and provide information as per available records, as per the provisions of the RTI Act, 2005 by 10.01.2024, free of cost.
The appeal is disposed of accordingly. |
NA |
839 |
CICOM/A/P/23/00187 |
Ms. ROOP AVTAR KAUR |
28-11-2023 |
Ref RTI No.- CICOM/R/P/23/00480
GROUNDS FOR FIRST APPEAL:
The Appellant submitted first appeal stating that
“I am to invite your kind attention towards the File No. CICOM/R/P/00480 My RTI application dated submitted to PIO CIC new Delhi has not mentioned, and to say that the requisite information provided by the PIO is misleading.
You are requested to take action under RTI act and provide the information please."
DECISION OF FIRST APPELLATE AUTHORITY:
The First Appeal, RTI application and reply given by CPIO of CIC have been perused.
As per Section 2(f) of the RTI Act, 2005 only such information as is available and existing and held by the public authority or is under control of the public authority can be provided by a PIO. The PIO is not supposed to create or collate information that is not a part of the record.
Accordingly, the reply given by the CPIO is appropriate and as per the provisions of the RTI Act, 2005. Hence, no intervention is required on behalf of the FAA in this matter.
The appeal is disposed of accordingly. |
NA |
840 |
CICOM/A/P/23/00186 |
Ms. ROOP AVTAR KAUR |
28-11-2023 |
Ref RTI No.-CICOM/R/P/23/00551
GROUNDS FOR FIRST APPEAL:
The Appellant submitted first appeal stating that
“I am to invite your kind attention the File No. CICOM/R/P/23/00551 My RTI application dated submitted to PIO CIC New Delhi has not mentioned, and to say that the requisite information provided by the PIO is misleading.
You are requested to take action under RTI Act and provide the information please."
DECISION OF FIRST APPELLATE AUTHORITY:
The First Appeal, RTI application and reply given by CPIO of CIC have been perused.
As per Section 2(f) of the RTI Act, 2005 only such information as is available and existing and held by the public authority or is under control of the public authority can be provided by a PIO. The PIO is not supposed to create or collate information that is not a part of the record.
Accordingly, the reply given by the CPIO is appropriate and as per the provisions of the RTI Act, 2005. Hence, no intervention is required on behalf of the FAA in this matter.
The appeal is disposed of accordingly. |
NA |