There are serious errors in your form submission, please see below for details.

Search RTI Appeal

List of RTI Appeal

SNo. Registration No Appellate Authority Name Received date Reply Appeal Reply Doc
861 CICOM/A/P/23/00183 Ms. ROOP AVTAR KAUR 13-11-2023 Ref RTI NO.-CICOM/R/P/23/00369 GROUNDS FOR FIRST APPEAL: The Appellant submitted first appeal stating that “I am to invite your kind attention towards my RTI application dated 06.07.2023 submitted to PIO CIC New Delhi. And to say that the requisite information has not been provided by the PIO. Hence it is deemed refused. You are requested to take action under RTI Act and provide the information please." DECISION OF FIRST APPELLATE AUTHORITY: The First Appeal, RTI application and reply given by CPIO of CIC have been perused. As per Section 2(f) of the RTI Act, 2005 only such information as is available and existing and held by the public authority or is under control of the public authority can be provided by a PIO. The PIO is not supposed to create or collate information that is not a part of the record. Accordingly, the reply given by the CPIO is appropriate and as per the provisions of the RTI Act, 2005. Hence, no intervention is required on behalf of the FAA in this matter. The appeal is disposed of accordingly. NA
862 CICOM/A/E/23/00401 Ms. ROOP AVTAR KAUR 12-11-2023 Ref RTI No. - CICOM/R/E/23/01201 GROUNDS FOR FIRST APPEAL: The Appellant submitted first appeal stating that "Dear Sir/Madam, The applicant had filed second appeal which was returned to him due to some irrelevant attachments in place of RTI application and first appeal as informed to him by CPIO in his reply. But CPIO has not provided the copy of that irrelevant documents submitted by mistake while applicant wants to know that which irrelevant documents are submitted by him instead of relevant documents. The second appeal is successfully submitted by the applicant, it means there is something else attached by the applicant instead of RTI application and first appeal. Therefore, kindly direct CPIO to provide the copy of those documents and name of pdf files attached by the applicant by mistake due to which second appeal is returned to him. Regards," DECISION OF FIRST APPELLATE AUTHORITY: The First Appeal, RTI application and reply given by CPIO of CIC have been perused. As per Section 2(f) of the RTI Act, 2005 only such information as is available and existing and held by the public authority or is under control of the public authority can be provided by a PIO. The PIO is not supposed to create or collate information that is not a part of the record. Accordingly, the reply given by the CPIO is appropriate and as per the provisions of the RTI Act,2005. Hence, no intervention is required on behalf of the FAA in this matter. The appeal is disposed of accordingly. NA
863 CICOM/A/E/23/00399 Ms. ROOP AVTAR KAUR 10-11-2023 Ref RTI No. -CICOM/R/T/23/00060 GROUNDS FOR FIRST APPEAL: The Appellant submitted first appeal stating that "Request RTI 2005/section 19 (1) Regarding Madam/ Sir already asked me a few information from CIC 2005. section 7 -1 and 6-1, 6- 3 So I First Appellate Authority 19 -1 " DECISION OF FIRST APPELLATE AUTHORITY: The First Appeal, RTI application and reply given by CPIO of CIC have been perused. As per Section 2(f) of the RTI Act, 2005 only such information as is available and existing and held by the public authority or is under control of the public authority can be provided by a PIO. The PIO is not supposed to create or collate information that is not a part of the record. Accordingly, the reply given by the CPIO is appropriate and as per the provisions of the RTI Act,2005. Hence, no intervention is required on behalf of the FAA in this matter. The appeal is disposed of accordingly. NA
864 CICOM/A/E/23/00398 Ms. ROOP AVTAR KAUR 10-11-2023 Ref RTI No. - CICOM/R/E/23/01185 GROUNDS FOR FIRST APPEAL: The Appellant submitted first appeal stating that "Concerned PIO I see you said the SGPC is not covered in RTI but here the article clearly states that SGPC is covered under RTI by CIC . If it is not the case then why did a very big Media firm such as Indian Express write such an article which is easily accessible only . Please provide the full information and if SGPC is not covered then can you please provide a copy of any ruling by CIC regarding this Also will you take any action Indian Express if that article is misleading ? Regards." DECISION OF FIRST APPELLATE AUTHORITY: The First Appeal, RTI application and reply given by CPIO of CIC have been perused. As per Section 2(f) of the RTI Act, 2005 only such information as is available and existing and held by the public authority or is under control of the public authority can be provided by a PIO. The PIO is not supposed to create or collate information that is not a part of the record. Accordingly, the reply given by the CPIO is appropriate and as per the provisions of the RTI Act,2005. Hence, no intervention is required on behalf of the FAA in this matter. The appeal is disposed of accordingly. NA
865 CICOM/A/E/23/00400 Ms. ROOP AVTAR KAUR 10-11-2023 Ref RTI No. - CICOM/R/E/23/01169 GROUNDS FOR FIRST APPEAL: The Appellant submitted first appeal stating that "To The First Appellate Authority, Central Information Commission, New Delhi. Subject: First Appeal under section 19(1) of RTI Act, 2005. Respected Madam, 1. I have submitted an online RTI No. CICOM/R/E/23/01169, dated 11/10/2023 under RTI Act, 2005 and the details of the information sought (Points No. 4 to 6) are as under: Point No.- (4). I had submitted online Non-Compliance on dated 7.12.2022 in reference to Appeal No. CIC/NIOPS/A/2021/638751, was received vide diary No. 665627 & Reminder was received vide diary No. 628700 on dated 12.06.2023 at CIC. Provide the complete set of certified copies of the proceeding, file noting, instructions & order/decision issued after the action taken on Non-Compliance/Reminder (vide diary No. 665627, dated 7.12.2022 & 628700, dated 12.06.2023) by the Honorable CIC. Point No.- (5). I had submitted online & offline dated 8.2.2023 in reference to Appeal case No. CIC/NIOPS/A/2021/638751, was received vide diary No. 607351 dated 8.2.2023 & 107562 dated 14.2.2023 at CIC. Provide the complete set of certified copies of the proceeding, file noting, instructions & order/decision issued after the action taken on application dated 8.02.2023 (vide diary No. 607351 & 107562) by the Honorable CIC. Point No.- (6). Provide the status (presently) & certified copy of the Compliance order passed by Honorable CIC, of the Appeal No CIC/NIOPS/A/2021/638751, in response to Non-Compliance dated 7.12.2022 vide diary No. 665627 & Reminder dated 12.06.2023 vide diary No. 628700. 2. The reply dated 06/11/2023, given by CPIO & Designated Officer, IC-HS is unsatisfactory, provided information (Points No. 4 to 6) is as under: Point No.- (4). The Commission while disposing the appeal no CIC/NIOPS/A/2021/638751 comment that Commission no further scope of intervention in the instant matter. As such no action has been taken on your non compliance petition dated 07.12.2022 and reminder dated 12.06.2023. reminded Point No.- (5). As per point no 4 and No action has been taken on your letter dated 08.02.2023 relating to file no. CIC/NIOPS/A/2021/638751. Point No.- (6). As per point no.4. 3. I am not satisfied with the reply of the CPIO, as the provided information regarding Points No. (4), (5) & (6) is incomplete & inaccurate. That the CPIO & Designated Officer, IC-HS is bound by the provision of RTI Act, 2005 to provide complete and correct information, until and unless it is exempted under sections 8 & 9 of the RTI Act 2005. The CPIO & Designated Officer, IC-HS, however, neither provided the information nor justified. Denial of the same, therefore, deliberately and maliciously hiding the truth. Respectfully praying for direction to the CPIO to provide the certified copies of requisite information sought in Points No. (4), (5) & (6) of RTI No. CICOM/R/E/23/01169. I declare that the above information is true & correct to my knowledge and no fact has been concealed. Regards," DECISION OF FIRST APPELLATE AUTHORITY: The First Appeal, RTI application and reply given by CPIO of CIC have been perused. As per Section 2(f) of the RTI Act, 2005 only such information as is available and existing and held by the public authority or is under control of the public authority can be provided by a PIO. The PIO is not supposed to create or collate information that is not a part of the record. Accordingly, the reply given by the CPIO is appropriate and as per the provisions of the RTI Act,2005. Hence, no intervention is required on behalf of the FAA in this matter. The appeal is disposed of accordingly. NA
866 CICOM/A/P/23/00181 Ms. ROOP AVTAR KAUR 09-11-2023 आर.टी.आई. आवेदन, प्रदान की गई सूचना एवं प्रथम अपील का अवलोकन करने पर पाया गया कि अपीलकर्ता के आर.टी.आई. आवेदन सं. CICOM/R/P/23/00395 में सूचना मांगी थी जिसके प्रतिउत्तर में केंद्रीय जन सूचना अधिकारी द्वारा प्रेषित की गई सूचना, सूचना का अधिकार अधिनियम के प्रावधानों एवं मांगी गई सूचना के अनुसार ही है। अतः सूचना के अधिकार अधिनियम की धारा 2 (च) के प्रावधानों के अनुसार एक जन सूचना अधिकारी केवल सम्बंधित लोक प्राधिकरण के रिकॉर्ड में एक सामग्री के रूप में उपलब्ध सूचना ही प्रदान कर सकता है। आर.टी.आई. एक्ट 2005, अधिनियम की धारा 6 (1) के अनुसार, आवेदक संबंधित लोक प्राधिकरण के पास सूचना अनुरोध दायर कर सकता है, जिस लोक प्राधिकरण के पास संबंधित जानकारी उपलब्ध है। अतः केंद्रीय जन सूचना अधिकारी द्वारा प्रदान की गई सूचना तथ्यात्मक है और इसमें प्रथम अपीलीय अधिकारी के हस्तक्षेप की कोई आवश्यकता नहीं है। NA
867 CICOM/A/E/23/00396 Ms. ROOP AVTAR KAUR 09-11-2023 Ref RTI No. - CICOM/R/E/23/01225 GROUNDS FOR FIRST APPEAL: The Appellant submitted first appeal stating that "Refused access to Information Requested." DECISION OF FIRST APPELLATE AUTHORITY: The First Appeal, RTI application and reply given by CPIO of CIC have been perused. In the instant case, CPIO (DR to IC-UM) is directed to revisit the RTI application and provide information as per available records, as per the provisions of the RTI Act, 2005 by 15.12.2023. The appeal is disposed of accordingly. NA
868 CICOM/A/P/23/00174 Ms. ROOP AVTAR KAUR 08-11-2023 Ref RTI NO.- CICOM/R/P/23/00502 GROUNDS FOR FIRST APPEAL: The Appellant submitted first appeal stating that “I am to invite your kind attention towards the File No. CICOM/R/P/23/00502 my RTI application dated submitted to PIO CIC New Delhi has not mentioned, and to say that the requisite information provided by the PIO is misleading. You are requested to take action under RTI Act and provide the information please." DECISION OF FIRST APPELLATE AUTHORITY: The First Appeal, RTI application and reply given by CPIO of CIC have been perused. As per Section 2(f) of the RTI Act, 2005 only such information as is available and existing and held by the public authority or is under control of the public authority can be provided by a PIO. The PIO is not supposed to create or collate information that is not a part of the record. Accordingly, the reply given by the CPIO is appropriate and as per the provisions of the RTI Act, 2005. Hence, no intervention is required on behalf of the FAA in this matter. The appeal is disposed of accordingly. NA
869 CICOM/A/P/23/00175 Ms. ROOP AVTAR KAUR 08-11-2023 Ref RTI No.- CICOM/R/P/23/00536 GROUNDS FOR FIRST APPEAL: The Appellant submitted first appeal stating that “I am to invite your kind attention towards the File No. CICOM/R/P/23/00536 my RTI application dated submitted to PIO CIC New Delhi has not mentioned, and to say that the requisite information provided by the PIO is misleading. You are requested to take action under RTI Act and provide the information please." DECISION OF FIRST APPELLATE AUTHORITY: The First Appeal, RTI application and reply given by CPIO of CIC have been perused. As per Section 2(f) of the RTI Act, 2005 only such information as is available and existing and held by the public authority or is under control of the public authority can be provided by a PIO. The PIO is not supposed to create or collate information that is not a part of the record. Accordingly, the reply given by the CPIO is appropriate and as per the provisions of the RTI Act, 2005. Hence, no intervention is required on behalf of the FAA in this matter. The appeal is disposed of accordingly. NA
870 CICOM/A/P/23/00176 Ms. ROOP AVTAR KAUR 08-11-2023 Ref RTI No.-CICOM/R/P/23/00525 GROUNDS FOR FIRST APPEAL: The Appellant submitted first appeal stating that “I am to invite your kind attention towards the File No. CICOM/R/P/23/00525 my RTI application dated submitted to PIO CIC New Delhi has not mentioned, and to say that the requisite information provided by the PIO is misleading. You are requested to take action under RTI Act and provide the information please." DECISION OF FIRST APPELLATE AUTHORITY: The First Appeal, RTI application and reply given by CPIO of CIC have been perused. As per Section 2(f) of the RTI Act, 2005 only such information as is available and existing and held by the public authority or is under control of the public authority can be provided by a PIO. The PIO is not supposed to create or collate information that is not a part of the record. Accordingly, the reply given by the CPIO is appropriate and as per the provisions of the RTI Act, 2005. Hence, no intervention is required on behalf of the FAA in this matter. The appeal is disposed of accordingly. NA