There are serious errors in your form submission, please see below for details.

Search RTI Appeal

List of RTI Appeal

SNo. Registration No Appellate Authority Name Received date Reply Appeal Reply Doc
871 CICOM/A/P/23/00177 Ms. ROOP AVTAR KAUR 08-11-2023 Ref RTI No.-CICOM/R/P/23/00526 GROUNDS FOR FIRST APPEAL: The Appellant submitted first appeal stating that “I am to invite your kind attention towards the File No. CICOM/R/P/23/00526 my RTI application dated submitted to PIO CIC New Delhi has not mentioned, and to say that the requisite information provided by the PIO is misleading. You are requested to take action under RTI Act and provide the information please." DECISION OF FIRST APPELLATE AUTHORITY: The First Appeal, RTI application and reply given by CPIO of CIC have been perused. As per Section 2(f) of the RTI Act, 2005 only such information as is available and existing and held by the public authority or is under control of the public authority can be provided by a PIO. The PIO is not supposed to create or collate information that is not a part of the record. Accordingly, the reply given by the CPIO is appropriate and as per the provisions of the RTI Act, 2005. Hence, no intervention is required on behalf of the FAA in this matter. The appeal is disposed of accordingly. NA
872 CICOM/A/P/23/00178 Ms. ROOP AVTAR KAUR 08-11-2023 Ref RTI No.-CICOM/R/P/23/00385 GROUNDS FOR FIRST APPEAL: The Appellant submitted first appeal stating that “I am to invite your kind attention towards my RTI application dated 14.07.2023 submitted to PIO CIC New Delhi. And to say that the requisite information has not been provided by the PIO. Hence it is deemed refused. You are requested to take action under RTI Act and provide the information please." DECISION OF FIRST APPELLATE AUTHORITY: The First Appeal, RTI application and reply given by CPIO of CIC have been perused. As per Section 2(f) of the RTI Act, 2005 only such information as is available and existing and held by the public authority or is under control of the public authority can be provided by a PIO. The PIO is not supposed to create or collate information that is not a part of the record. Accordingly, the reply given by the CPIO is appropriate and as per the provisions of the RTI Act, 2005. Hence, no intervention is required on behalf of the FAA in this matter. The appeal is disposed of accordingly. NA
873 CICOM/A/P/23/00179 Ms. ROOP AVTAR KAUR 08-11-2023 Ref RTI No.-CICOM/R/P/23/00496 GROUNDS FOR FIRST APPEAL: The Appellant submitted first appeal stating that “I am to invite your kind attention towards the File No. CICOM/R/P/23/00496 my RTI application dated 28.08.2023 submitted to PIO CIC New Delhi has not mentioned, and to say that the requisite information has not been provided by the PIO, hence it is deemed refused. You are requested to take action under RTI Act and provide the information please." DECISION OF FIRST APPELLATE AUTHORITY: The First Appeal, RTI application and reply given by CPIO of CIC have been perused. As per Section 2(f) of the RTI Act, 2005 only such information as is available and existing and held by the public authority or is under control of the public authority can be provided by a PIO. The PIO is not supposed to create or collate information that is not a part of the record. Accordingly, the reply given by the CPIO is appropriate and as per the provisions of the RTI Act, 2005. Hence, no intervention is required on behalf of the FAA in this matter. The appeal is disposed of accordingly. NA
874 CICOM/A/P/23/00180 Ms. ROOP AVTAR KAUR 08-11-2023 Ref RTI No.-CICOM/R/P/23/00334 GROUNDS FOR FIRST APPEAL: The Appellant submitted first appeal stating that “Sir I am to invite your kind attention towards my RTI application dated 13.06.2023 submitted to PIO CIC New Delhi, and to say that the requisite information has not been provided by the PIO. Hence it is deemed refused. You are requested to take action under RTI act and provide the information please." DECISION OF FIRST APPELLATE AUTHORITY: The First Appeal, RTI application and reply given by CPIO of CIC have been perused. As per Section 2(f) of the RTI Act, 2005 only such information as is available and existing and held by the public authority or is under control of the public authority can be provided by a PIO. The PIO is not supposed to create or collate information that is not a part of the record. Accordingly, the reply given by the CPIO is appropriate and as per the provisions of the RTI Act, 2005. Hence, no intervention is required on behalf of the FAA in this matter. The appeal is disposed of accordingly. NA
875 CICOM/A/E/23/00395 Ms. ROOP AVTAR KAUR 08-11-2023 Ref RTI No. - CICOM/R/E/23/01130/2 GROUNDS FOR FIRST APPEAL: The Appellant submitted first appeal stating that "Point no. e, f, g, h, i & j were transferred to this CPIO. Wrt point e & f, non-compliance hearing was held and appropriate action directed by Honble CIC. Wrt point g & h, information has been now received. Wrt point i & j, it is submitted that no update whatsoever has been received. Please see the queries again-- In matter CIC/DIRED/A/2022/652966, reply to RTI queries (f), (g), (h), (i) was supposed to be provided within 21 days of order dated 07-Aug-23. Only Education Directorate can provide it and not Zonal Deputy Directors or School Principals. The replies are not being provided and Social Worker under School Management Committees of Delhi Govt are being appointed by politicians of the ruling Delhi Govt. People who have not even passed 5th class are social workers in field of education. Such is the state of affairs and thats why the RTI was filed." DECISION OF FIRST APPELLATE AUTHORITY: The First Appeal, RTI application and reply given by CPIO of CIC have been perused. In the instant case, CPIO (DR to IC-VT) is directed to reply to the RTI application and provide information as per available records, as per the provisions of the RTI Act, 2005 by 15.12.2023, free of cost. The appeal is disposed of accordingly. NA
876 CICOM/A/E/23/00394 Ms. ROOP AVTAR KAUR 08-11-2023 Ref RTI No. - CICOM/R/E/23/01082 GROUNDS FOR FIRST APPEAL: The Appellant submitted first appeal stating that "Permission has been granted vide Order dated 09.10.2023 by Learned CPIO to File this First Appeal under RTI Act, 2005 before this Hon’ble Authority. Learned CPIO utterly failed to provide information pertaining to current action status of Notice of Motion dated 17.09.2023 of this RTI Appellant. Therefore, this Hon’ble Appellate Authority kindly be pleased to provide current action status of Notice of Motion dated 17.09.2023 of this RTI Appellant. Further Learned CPIO utterly failed to provide any information pertaining to judicial proceedings which were under taken or to be taken by Hon’ble Central Information Commission ensuring mandatory compliance of mandatory Section 4 of RTI Act, 2005. Therefore, this Hon’ble Authority is prayed to direct Learned CPIO to revisit the Original RTI Application for providing correct, complete and appropriate information pertaining to implementation of Para 27 of Judgment dated 17.08.2023 of Hon’ble Supreme Court of India passed in W.P.C. No. 990 of 2021. This may kindly be treated as extremely urgent." DECISION OF FIRST APPELLATE AUTHORITY: The First Appeal, RTI application and reply given by CPIO of CIC have been perused. As per Section 2(f) of the RTI Act, 2005 only such information as is available and existing and held by the public authority or is under control of the public authority can be provided by a PIO. The PIO is not supposed to create or collate information that is not a part of the record. Accordingly, the reply given by the CPIO is appropriate and as per the provisions of the RTI Act,2005. Hence, no intervention is required on behalf of the FAA in this matter. The appeal is disposed of accordingly. NA
877 CICOM/A/P/23/00167 Ms. ROOP AVTAR KAUR 06-11-2023 Ref RTI No.- CICOM/R/P/23/00445 GROUNDS FOR FIRST APPEAL: The Appellant submitted first appeal stating that “I am to invite your kind attention towards the File No. CICOM/R/P/23/00445 my RTI application dated submitted to PIO CIC New Delhi has not mentioned, and to say that the requisite information provided by the PIO is misleading. You are requested to take action under RTI Act and provide the information please." DECISION OF FIRST APPELLATE AUTHORITY: The First Appeal, RTI application and reply given by CPIO of CIC have been perused. As per Section 2(f) of the RTI Act, 2005 only such information as is available and existing and held by the public authority or is under control of the public authority can be provided by a PIO. The PIO is not supposed to create or collate information that is not a part of the record. Accordingly, the reply given by the CPIO is appropriate and as per the provisions of the RTI Act, 2005. Hence, no intervention is required on behalf of the FAA in this matter. The appeal is disposed of accordingly. NA
878 CICOM/A/P/23/00168 Ms. ROOP AVTAR KAUR 06-11-2023 Ref RTI No.- CICOM/R/P/23/00440 GROUNDS FOR FIRST APPEAL: The Appellant submitted first appeal stating that “I am to invite your kind attention towards the File No. CICOM/R/P/23/00440 my RTI application dated submitted to PIO CIC New Delhi has not mentioned, and to say that the requisite information provided by the PIO is misleading. You are requested to take action under RTI Act and provide the information please." DECISION OF FIRST APPELLATE AUTHORITY: The First Appeal, RTI application and reply given by CPIO of CIC have been perused. As per Section 2(f) of the RTI Act, 2005 only such information as is available and existing and held by the public authority or is under control of the public authority can be provided by a PIO. The PIO is not supposed to create or collate information that is not a part of the record. Accordingly, the reply given by the CPIO is appropriate and as per the provisions of the RTI Act, 2005. Hence, no intervention is required on behalf of the FAA in this matter. The appeal is disposed of accordingly. NA
879 CICOM/A/P/23/00169 Ms. ROOP AVTAR KAUR 06-11-2023 Ref RTI No.- CICOM/R/P/23/00535 GROUNDS FOR FIRST APPEAL: The Appellant submitted first appeal stating that “I am to invite your kind attention towards the File No. CICOM/R/P/23/00535 my RTI application dated submitted to PIO CIC New Delhi has not mentioned, and to say that the requisite information provided by the PIO is misleading. You are requested to take action under RTI Act and provide the information please." DECISION OF FIRST APPELLATE AUTHORITY: The First Appeal, RTI application and reply given by CPIO of CIC have been perused. As per Section 2(f) of the RTI Act, 2005 only such information as is available and existing and held by the public authority or is under control of the public authority can be provided by a PIO. The PIO is not supposed to create or collate information that is not a part of the record. Accordingly, the reply given by the CPIO is appropriate and as per the provisions of the RTI Act, 2005. Hence, no intervention is required on behalf of the FAA in this matter. The appeal is disposed of accordingly. NA
880 CICOM/A/P/23/00170 Ms. ROOP AVTAR KAUR 06-11-2023 आर.टी.आई. आवेदन, प्रदान की गई सूचना एवं प्रथम अपील का अवलोकन किया गया, अतः केंद्रीय जन सूचना अधिकारी को निर्देश दिया जाता है कि इस आदेश के प्राप्ति के दस दिन के भीतर दिनांक 20.11.2023 तक आर.टी.आई. आवेदन सं. CICOM/R/P/23/00544 के तहत मांगी गई सूचना का अवलोकन कर अपीलकर्ता को पुनः स्पष्ट सूचना प्रेषित की जाये। NA