There are serious errors in your form submission, please see below for details.

Search RTI Appeal

List of RTI Appeal

SNo. Registration No Appellate Authority Name Received date Reply Appeal Reply Doc
911 CICOM/A/E/23/00369 Ms. ROOP AVTAR KAUR 16-10-2023 Ref RTI No.- CICOM/R/E/23/01037 GROUNDS FOR FIRST APPEAL: The Appellant submitted first appeal stating that "Provided partial information, Date since the post of Information Commissioners are Vacant not provided hence information provided is Incomplete" DECISION OF THE FIRST APPELLATE AUTHORITY: The First Appeal, RTI application and reply given by CPIO of CIC have been perused. The information is already available on the website of the Commission. The dates of appointment of Information Commissioners and the dates of demitting office of the Information Commissioners can also be seen from the seen under Circulars Section of the website. The appeal is disposed of accordingly. NA
912 CICOM/A/P/23/00160 Ms. ROOP AVTAR KAUR 16-10-2023 आर. टी. आई. आवेदन, प्रदान की गई सूचना एवं प्रथम अपील का अवलोकन किया गया, अतः केंद्रीय जन सूचना अधिकारी को निर्देश दिया जाता है कि इस आदेश के प्राप्ति के दस दिन के भीतर दिनांक 30.10.2023 तक आर.टी.आई. आवेदन सं. CICOM/R/P/23/00477 के तहत मांगी गई सूचना का अवलोकन कर अपीलकर्ता को पुनः स्पष्ट सूचना प्रेषित की जाये। NA
913 CICOM/A/E/23/00370 Ms. ROOP AVTAR KAUR 16-10-2023 Ref RTI No.- CICOM/R/E/23/01116 GROUNDS FOR FIRST APPEAL: The Appellant submitted first appeal stating that "I am not satisfied with reply because CPIO simply prescribed me a website and I am not able to search my information on concerned website. Please look into the matter and provide me information as soon possible. I will be thankful to you for this." DECISION OF THE FIRST APPELLATE AUTHORITY: The First Appeal, RTI application and reply given by CPIO of CIC have been perused. As per Section 2(f) of the RTI Act, 2005 only such information as is available and existing and held by the public authority or is under control of the public authority can be provided by a PIO. The PIO is not supposed to create or collate information that is not a part of the record. Accordingly, the reply given by the CPIO is appropriate and as per the provisions of the RTI Act, 2005. Hence, no intervention is required on behalf of the FAA in this matter. The appeal is disposed of accordingly. NA
914 CICOM/A/E/23/00368 Ms. ROOP AVTAR KAUR 15-10-2023 Ref RTI No.- CICOM/R/E/23/00996 GROUNDS FOR FIRST APPEAL: The Appellant submitted first appeal stating that "Against my RTI application no. CICOM/R/E/23/00996, I am in receipt of a reply from the CPIO on 15.09.2023 in which there are two misleading replies that lacks transparency. I am aggrieved with such replies from the Honourable Central Information Commission and, hence, this appeal. Against item no. 1 of my RTI application, information has been denied on the ground that seeking any opinion / clarification from CPIO is not covered under the definition of information as per Section 2 (f) of RTI Act, 2005. I had neither sought any opinion nor any clarification; what I wanted was the information that was in the possession of the public authority as an action had been performed on said information. Had I sought for said information before accomplishing the action, the information sought for would have been a matter of seeking an opinion / clarification. Against item no. 2, the information has been denied by stating that the CPIO is not competent to make any comment on the decision of the Commission. As per Section 19 (7) of RTI Act, Commission decision is final. I did not at all ask / request the CPIO to make any comment on the decision of the Commission. I sought for a copy of the rule / operating procedure under which the particular action was taken by the public authority (CIC). It must be noted that such rule / operating procedure must be in the possession of the CIC otherwise such public action could not have been taken. Against item no. 3, the reply given by the CPIO is being accepted by me since the information might be considered as decision of the Honourable Information Commissioner that was based on his application of mind. I accept that information that generated from application of mind is out of the purview of the RTI Act, 2005. Against item no. 4, since the CPIO furnished the information, irrespective of the fact as to whether non-conducting of enquiry was correct or not, I received the information sought for. I pray before the First Appellate Authority for directing the CPIO to supply the information sought for in items no. 1 and 2. In case his decision is otherwise, such as concurring with the replies of CPIO, a copy of the hearing proceeding on the first appeal should be supplied to me as, in terms of Section 19 (5) of the RTI Act, 2005, in any appeal proceedings, the onus to prove that a denial of a request was justified shall be on the Central Public Information Officer who denied the request. " DECISION OF THE FIRST APPELLATE AUTHORITY: The First Appeal, RTI application and reply given by CPIO of CIC have been perused. As per Section 2(f) of the RTI Act, 2005 only such information as is available and existing and held by the public authority or is under control of the public authority can be provided by a PIO. The PIO is not supposed to create or collate information that is not a part of the record. Accordingly, the reply given by the CPIO is appropriate and as per the provisions of the RTI Act, 2005. Hence, no intervention is required on behalf of the FAA in this matter. The appeal is disposed of accordingly. NA
915 CICOM/A/P/23/00158 Ms. ROOP AVTAR KAUR 13-10-2023 आर.टी.आई. आवेदन, प्रदान की गई सूचना एवं प्रथम अपील का अवलोकन करने पर पाया गया कि अपीलकर्ता के आर.टी.आई. आवेदन सं. CICOM/R/P/23/00457 में सूचना मांगी थी जिसके प्रतिउत्तर में केंद्रीय जन सूचना अधिकारी द्वारा प्रेषित की गई सूचना, सूचना का अधिकार अधिनियम के प्रावधानों एवं मांगी गई सूचना के अनुसार ही है। अतः सूचना के अधिकार अधिनियम की धारा 2 (च) के प्रावधानों के अनुसार एक जन सूचना अधिकारी केवल सम्बंधित लोक प्राधिकरण के रिकॉर्ड में एक सामग्री के रूप में उपलब्ध सूचना ही प्रदान कर सकता है। अतः केंद्रीय जन सूचना अधिकारी द्वारा प्रदान की गई सूचना तथ्यात्मक है और इसमें प्रथम अपीलीय अधिकारी के हस्तक्षेप की कोई आवश्यकता नहीं है। NA
916 CICOM/A/P/23/00159 Ms. ROOP AVTAR KAUR 13-10-2023 आर.टी.आई. आवेदन, प्रदान की गई सूचना एवं प्रथम अपील का अवलोकन करने पर पाया गया कि अपीलकर्ता के आर.टी.आई. आवेदन सं. CICOM/R/P/23/00513 में सूचना मांगी थी जिसके प्रतिउत्तर में केंद्रीय जन सूचना अधिकारी द्वारा प्रेषित की गई सूचना, सूचना का अधिकार अधिनियम के प्रावधानों एवं मांगी गई सूचना के अनुसार ही है। अतः केंद्रीय जन सूचना अधिकारी द्वारा प्रदान की गई सूचना तथ्यात्मक है और इसमें प्रथम अपीलीय अधिकारी के हस्तक्षेप की कोई आवश्यकता नहीं है। NA
917 CICOM/A/E/23/00367 Ms. ROOP AVTAR KAUR 13-10-2023 Ref RTI No.- CICOM/R/E/23/01086 GROUNDS FOR FIRST APPEAL: The Appellant submitted first appeal stating that "Sir, The Reply of CPIO for question no-2 & 3 is incomplete /misleading in line with recent decision vide second appeal No. CIC/DELTL/A/2022/654599-UM Dated 07.08.2023 ." DECISION OF THE FIRST APPELLATE AUTHORITY: The First Appeal, RTI application and reply given by CPIO of CIC have been perused. For Point No.2 The decision of the Commission cannot be reviewed. For Point No.3 The information sought is more in the form of a clarification and is not covered under Section 2(f) of the RTI Act, 2005. As per Section 2(f) of the RTI Act, 2005 only such information as is available and existing and held by the public authority or is under control of the public authority can be provided by a PIO. The PIO is not supposed to create or collate information that is not a part of the record. Hence, no intervention is required on behalf of the FAA in this matter. The appeal is disposed of accordingly. NA
918 CICOM/A/P/23/00156 Ms. ROOP AVTAR KAUR 12-10-2023 आर. टी. आई. आवेदन, प्रदान की गई सूचना एवं प्रथम अपील का अवलोकन किया गया, अतः केंद्रीय जन सूचना अधिकारी को निर्देश दिया जाता है कि इस आदेश के प्राप्ति के दस दिन के भीतर दिनांक 30.10.2023 तक आर.टी.आई. आवेदन सं. CICOM/R/P/23/00487 के तहत मांगी गई सूचना का अवलोकन कर अपीलकर्ता को पुनः स्पष्ट सूचना प्रेषित की जाये। NA
919 CICOM/A/P/23/00157 Ms. ROOP AVTAR KAUR 12-10-2023 आर. टी. आई. आवेदन, प्रदान की गई सूचना एवं प्रथम अपील का अवलोकन करने पर पाया गया कि अपीलकर्ता के आर.टी.आई. आवेदन सं. CICOM/R/P/2023/00442 में सूचना मांगी थी जिसके प्रतिउत्तर में केंद्रीय जन सूचना अधिकारी द्वारा प्रेषित की गई सूचना, सूचना का अधिकार अधिनियम के प्रावधानों एवं मांगी गई सूचना के अनुसार नहीं है। अतः केंद्रीय जन सूचना अधिकारी को निर्देश दिया जाता है कि इस आदेश के प्राप्ति के दस दिन के भीतर दिनांक 30.10.2023 तक आर.टी.आई. आवेदन सं. CICOM/R/P/23/00442 के तहत मांगी गई सूचना का अवलोकन कर अपीलकर्ता को पुनः स्पष्ट सूचना प्रेषित की जाये। NA
920 CICOM/A/E/23/00366 Ms. ROOP AVTAR KAUR 12-10-2023 Ref RTI No.-CICOM/R/E/23/01072 GROUNDS FOR FIRST APPEAL: The Appellant submitted first appeal stating that CPIO Refused access to Information Requested. DECISION OF THE FIRST APPELLATE AUTHORITY: The First Appeal, RTI application and reply given by CPIO of CIC have been perused. The reply given by the CPIO is appropriate and as per the provisions of the RTI Act, 2005. Hence, no intervention is required on behalf of the FAA in this matter. The appeal is disposed of accordingly. NA