There are serious errors in your form submission, please see below for details.

Search RTI Appeal

List of RTI Appeal

SNo. Registration No Appellate Authority Name Received date Reply Appeal Reply Doc
941 CICOM/A/E/23/00353 Ms. ROOP AVTAR KAUR 24-09-2023 Ref RTI No.- CICOM/R/E/23/01095/2 GROUNDS FOR FIRST APPEAL: The Appellant submitted first appeal stating that "A: RELIEF SOUGHT: Transfer of this RTI appeal to CVC, Railway and CVO/CIC w.r.t non-compliance of decision dated 15/03/2023 of Information Commissioner Sh Uday Mahurkar by respondent Southern Railway/Chennai Division and/or Railway Board. The matter is related to CVC Complaint 3487/2022 dated 31/12/2022 against Information Commissioner Sh Uday Mahurkar and marked to Railway on 17/01/2023 B. GROUNDS FOR APPEAL: No ink/digitally signed document from PIO is found attached with the disposal of the RTI request meaning thereby that an unknown criminal is dealing/operating online RTI requests as seen from the Year 2014 onwards. The attached document shows name of Sh Sharad Kumar DR/Central Registry-1. In place of signature, there is an image which is not a valid mode of signature. Email ID of Sh sharad Kumar is drcr1@cic.nic.in at which email dated 09/10/2021 was sent with the subject - Absence of response to request for audit of loss to government on account of delay in finalisation of disciplinary case arising from CVC ID Note No. Conf/2106/10/107479 dated 04/10/2010, Major Penalty Charge Memorandum dated 11/07/2011 issued by GM/CORE/ALD to Sh Praveen Poddar DyCEE/RE/NJP (now working as DyCEE/Coord/MLG/NFR). Matter of the email is now related to CVC Complaint 28691/2023 dated 20/09/2023 against AZ/CVC Sh A K Kanoujia who has been dealing issues of appellant since 23/06/2017 in a criminal manner. C. FACTS - Kindly note the following RTI appeal (edited/updated text) CICOM/A/E/23/00044 dated 23/01/2023 CA: The matter is related to CVC Complaint 3487/2022 dated 31/12/2022 against Information Commissioner Sh Uday Mahurkar and marked to Railway on 17/01/2023 CB. GROUNDS FOR APPEAL: No ink/digitally signed document from PIO is found attached with the disposal of the RTI request meaning thereby that an unknown criminal is dealing/operating online RTI requests as seen from the Year 2014 onwards. CC. FACTS - Kindly note the following RTI appeal (edited/updated text) - CICOM/A/2014/60045 dated 08/10/2014 The relief sought: Cognisance of the RTI case as a complaint under section 18 (1) (c) and 18(1) (e) of the RTI Act duly initiating inquiry under section 18(2) and section 18(3) of RTI Act 1) On account of blatant violation of sections 7(1) and 19(6) of RTI Act by the Vigilance Directorate of Railway Board under the Ministry of Railways, the matter was reported to CVC on 03/08/201. CVC was investigating the matter vide complaint 18464/2014. 2) Ministry of Railways disposed of RTI appeal MORLY/A/2014/60924 dated 29/07/2014 on 27/05/2021. In the appeal, lapses in 59 RTI cases were attached. 3) Ministry of Railways disposed of RTI request MORLY/R/2013/61390 dated 30/09/2013 on 29/05/2017 Status APPEAL DISPOSED OF as on 19/12/2014 Date of Action 19/12/2014 " DECISION OF THE FIRST APPELLATE AUTHORITY: The First Appeal, RTI application and reply given by CPIO of CIC have been perused. As per Section 2(f) of the RTI Act, 2005 only such information as is available and existing and held by the public authority or is under control of the public authority can be provided by a PIO. The PIO is not supposed to create or collate information that is not a part of the record. Accordingly, the reply given by the CPIO is appropriate and as per the provisions of the RTI Act,2005. Hence, no intervention is required on behalf of the FAA in this matter. The appeal is disposed of accordingly. NA
942 CICOM/A/P/23/00147 Ms. ROOP AVTAR KAUR 22-09-2023 Ref RTI No.- CICOM/R/P/23/00404 GROUNDS FOR FIRST APPEAL: The Appellant submitted first appeal stating that “The CPIO has supplied an unsatisfactory reply to that RTI. Relief Sought: Please instruct the PIO to give the information forthwith.” DECISION OF FIRST APPELLATE AUTHORITY: The First Appeal, RTI application and reply given by CPIO of CIC have been perused. As per Section 2(f) of the RTI Act, 2005 only such information as is available and existing and held by the public authority or is under control of the public authority can be provided by a PIO. The PIO is not supposed to create or collate information that is not a part of the record. Accordingly, the reply given by the CPIO is appropriate and as per the provisions of the RTI Act, 2005. Hence, no intervention is required on behalf of the FAA in this matter. The appeal is disposed of accordingly. NA
943 CICOM/A/P/23/00144 Ms. ROOP AVTAR KAUR 21-09-2023 Ref RTI No.- CICOM/R/P/23/00351 GROUNDS FOR FIRST APPEAL: The Appellant submitted first appeal stating that “I had submitted a RTI application dated 22.6.2023 to PIO CIC New Delhi. Regretted to say that the PIO has not furnished the information it is deemed refused. You are requested to kindly look in the matter personal, and action under section 7(6).” DECISION OF FIRST APPELLATE AUTHORITY: The First Appeal, RTI application and reply given by CPIO of CIC have been perused. As per Section 2(f) of the RTI Act, 2005 only such information as is available and existing and held by the public authority or is under control of the public authority can be provided by a PIO. The PIO is not supposed to create or collate information that is not a part of the record. In the instant case, the CPIO furnished reply to the RTI application on 02.08.2023 i.e. within the prescribed time limit as per the provisions of the RTI Act, 2005, but as mentioned by the appellant in the first appeal of non-receipt of the reply, a copy of the RTI reply is being attached with this order. Accordingly, the reply given by the CPIO is appropriate and as per the provisions of the RTI Act, 2005. Hence, no intervention is required on behalf of the FAA in this matter. The appeal is disposed of accordingly. NA
944 CICOM/A/P/23/00145 Ms. ROOP AVTAR KAUR 21-09-2023 Ref RTI No.- CICOM/R/P/23/00350 GROUNDS FOR FIRST APPEAL: The Appellant submitted first appeal stating that “I had submitted a RTI application dated 21.6.2023 to PIO CIC New Delhi. Regretted to say that the PIO has not furnished the information it is deemed refused. You are requested to kindly look in the matter personal, and action under section 7(6).” DECISION OF FIRST APPELLATE AUTHORITY: The First Appeal, RTI application and reply given by CPIO of CIC have been perused. As per Section 2(f) of the RTI Act, 2005 only such information as is available and existing and held by the public authority or is under control of the public authority can be provided by a PIO. The PIO is not supposed to create or collate information that is not a part of the record. In the instant case, the CPIO furnished reply to the RTI application on 02.08.2023 i.e. within the prescribed time limit as per the provisions of the RTI Act, 2005, but as mentioned by the appellant in the first appeal of non-receipt of the reply, a copy of the RTI reply is being attached with this order. Accordingly, the reply given by the CPIO is appropriate and as per the provisions of the RTI Act, 2005. Hence, no intervention is required on behalf of the FAA in this matter. The appeal is disposed of accordingly. NA
945 CICOM/A/P/23/00146 Ms. ROOP AVTAR KAUR 21-09-2023 Ref RTI No.- CICOM/R/P/23/00349 GROUNDS FOR FIRST APPEAL: The Appellant submitted first appeal stating that “I had submitted a RTI application dated 23.6.2023 to PIO CIC New Delhi. Regretted to say that the PIO has not furnished the information it is deemed refused. You are requested to kindly look in the matter personal, and action under section 7(6).” DECISION OF FIRST APPELLATE AUTHORITY: The First Appeal, RTI application and reply given by CPIO of CIC have been perused. As per Section 2(f) of the RTI Act, 2005 only such information as is available and existing and held by the public authority or is under control of the public authority can be provided by a PIO. The PIO is not supposed to create or collate information that is not a part of the record. In the instant case, the CPIO furnished reply to the RTI application on 02.08.2023 i.e. within the prescribed time limit as per the provisions of the RTI Act, 2005, but as mentioned by the appellant in the first appeal of non-receipt of the reply, a copy of the RTI reply is being attached with this order. Accordingly, the reply given by the CPIO is appropriate and as per the provisions of the RTI Act, 2005. Hence, no intervention is required on behalf of the FAA in this matter. The appeal is disposed of accordingly. NA
946 CICOM/A/E/23/00352 Ms. ROOP AVTAR KAUR 21-09-2023 Ref RTI No.- CICOM/R/E/23/01056 GROUNDS FOR FIRST APPEAL: The Appellant submitted first appeal stating that "Instead of providing a clear answer, the PIO directs me to refer to RTI Act of 2005. Hence, I ask the Appellate Authority to look into the same and give a clear statement of answer." DECISION OF THE FIRST APPELLATE AUTHORITY: The First Appeal, RTI application and reply given by CPIO of CIC have been perused. As per Section 2(f) of the RTI Act, 2005 only such information as is available and existing and held by the public authority or is under control of the public authority can be provided by a PIO. The PIO is not supposed to create or collate information that is not a part of the record. Accordingly, the reply given by the CPIO is appropriate and as per the provisions of the RTI Act,2005. Hence, no intervention is required on behalf of the FAA in this matter. The appeal is disposed of accordingly. NA
947 CICOM/A/P/23/00141 Ms. ROOP AVTAR KAUR 20-09-2023 Ref RTI No.- CICOM/R/P/23/00458 DECISION OF FIRST APPELLATE AUTHORITY: The First Appeal, RTI application and reply given by CPIO of CIC have been perused. In the instant case, CPIO (DR to CIC) is directed to revisit the RTI application and provide information as sought by the appellant without enclosures as per the provisions of the RTI Act, 2005, by 13.10.2023. The appeal is disposed of accordingly. NA
948 CICOM/A/P/23/00142 Ms. ROOP AVTAR KAUR 20-09-2023 Ref RTI No.- CICOM/R/P/23/00461 DECISION OF FIRST APPELLATE AUTHORITY: The First Appeal, RTI application and reply given by CPIO of CIC have been perused. As per Section 2(f) of the RTI Act, 2005 only such information as is available and existing and held by the public authority or is under control of the public authority can be provided by a PIO. The PIO is not supposed to create or collate information that is not a part of the record. Accordingly, the reply given by the CPIO is appropriate and as per the provisions of the RTI Act, 2005. Hence, no intervention is required on behalf of the FAA in this matter. The appeal is disposed of accordingly. NA
949 CICOM/A/P/23/00143 Ms. ROOP AVTAR KAUR 20-09-2023 आर. टी. आई. आवेदन, प्रदान की गई सूचना एवं प्रथम अपील का अवलोकन करने पर पाया गया कि अपीलकर्ता के आर.टी.आई. आवेदन सं. CICOM/R/P/23/00460 में सूचना मांगी थी जिसके प्रतिउत्तर में केंद्रीय जन सूचना अधिकारी द्वारा प्रेषित की गई सूचना, सूचना का अधिकार अधिनियम के प्रावधानों एवं मांगी गई सूचना के अनुसार ही है। अतः सूचना के अधिकार अधिनियम की धारा 2 (च) के प्रावधानों के अनुसार एक जन सूचना अधिकारी केवल सम्बंधित लोक प्राधिकरण के रिकॉर्ड में एक सामग्री के रूप में उपलब्ध सूचना ही प्रदान कर सकता है। अतः केंद्रीय जन सूचना अधिकारी द्वारा प्रदान की गई सूचना तथ्यात्मक है और इसमें प्रथम अपीलीय अधिकारी के हस्तक्षेप की कोई आवश्यकता नहीं है। NA
950 CICOM/A/E/23/00351 Ms. ROOP AVTAR KAUR 20-09-2023 RTI No.- CICOM/R/E/23/00932 निर्णय आर. टी. आई. आवेदन, प्रदान की गई सूचना एवं प्रथम अपील का अवलोकन करने पर पाया गया कि अपीलकर्ता के आर.टी.आई. आवेदन सं. CICOM/R/E/23/00932 में सूचना मांगी थी जिसके प्रतिउत्तर में केंद्रीय जन सूचना अधिकारी द्वारा प्रेषित की गई सूचना, सूचना का अधिकार अधिनियम के प्रावधानों एवं मांगी गई सूचना के अनुसार ही है। अतः सूचना के अधिकार अधिनियम की धारा 2 (च) के प्रावधानों के अनुसार एक जन सूचना अधिकारी केवल सम्बंधित लोक प्राधिकरण के रिकॉर्ड में एक सामग्री के रूप में उपलब्ध सूचना ही प्रदान कर सकता है। अतः केंद्रीय जन सूचना अधिकारी द्वारा प्रदान की गई सूचना तथ्यात्मक है और इसमें प्रथम अपीलीय अधिकारी के हस्तक्षेप की कोई आवश्यकता नहीं है। NA