There are serious errors in your form submission, please see below for details.

Search RTI Appeal

List of RTI Appeal

SNo. Registration No Appellate Authority Name Received date Reply Appeal Reply Doc
931 CICOM/A/E/23/00357 Ms. ROOP AVTAR KAUR 05-10-2023 Ref RTI No.- CICOM/R/E/23/01050 GROUNDS FOR FIRST APPEAL: The Appellant submitted first appeal stating that "RTI Online First Appeal in PDF is attached herewith pertaining to implementation of Para 27 of Judgment dated 17.08.2023 in W.P.C. No. 990 of 2021 of Honble Supreme Court of India in the matter of Kishan Chand Jain versus Union of India and others which directed Central Information Commission to ensure compliance of mandatory Section 4 of RTI Act, 2005." DECISION OF THE FIRST APPELLATE AUTHORITY: The First Appeal, RTI application and reply given by CPIO of CIC have been perused. In the instant case, CPIO (Legal Cell) is directed to revisit the RTI application and provide information as per available records, as per the provisions of the RTI Act, 2005 by 10.11.2023. The appeal is disposed of accordingly. NA
932 CICOM/A/E/23/00358 Ms. ROOP AVTAR KAUR 05-10-2023 Ref RTI No.- CICOM/R/E/23/01061 GROUNDS FOR FIRST APPEAL: The Appellant submitted first appeal stating that "RTI Online First Appeal in PDF is attached herewith pertaining to implementation of Para 27 of Judgment dated 17.08.2023 in W.P.C. No. 990 of 2021 of Honble Supreme Court of India in the matter of Kishan Chand Jain versus Union of India and others which directed Central Information Commission to ensure compliance of mandatory Section 4 of RTI Act, 2005." DECISION OF THE FIRST APPELLATE AUTHORITY: The First Appeal, RTI application and reply given by CPIO of CIC have been perused. In the instant case, CPIO (Legal Cell) is directed to revisit the RTI application and provide information as per available records, as per the provisions of the RTI Act, 2005 by 10.11.2023. The appeal is disposed of accordingly. NA
933 CICOM/A/P/23/00150 Ms. ROOP AVTAR KAUR 03-10-2023 आर. टी. आई. आवेदन, प्रदान की गई सूचना एवं प्रथम अपील का अवलोकन करने पर पाया गया कि अपीलकर्ता के आर.टी.आई. आवेदन सं. CICOM/R/P/23/00479 में सूचना मांगी थी जिसके प्रतिउत्तर में केंद्रीय जन सूचना अधिकारी द्वारा प्रेषित की गई सूचना, सूचना का अधिकार अधिनियम के प्रावधानों एवं मांगी गई सूचना के अनुसार ही है। अतः केंद्रीय जन सूचना अधिकारी द्वारा प्रदान की गई सूचना तथ्यात्मक है और इसमें प्रथम अपीलीय अधिकारी के हस्तक्षेप की कोई आवश्यकता नहीं है। NA
934 CICOM/A/P/23/00151 Ms. ROOP AVTAR KAUR 03-10-2023 आर. टी. आई. आवेदन, प्रदान की गई सूचना एवं प्रथम अपील का अवलोकन करने पर पाया गया कि अपीलकर्ता के आर.टी.आई. आवेदन सं. CICOM/R/P/23/00472 में सूचना मांगी थी जिसके प्रतिउत्तर में केंद्रीय जन सूचना अधिकारी द्वारा प्रेषित की गई सूचना, सूचना का अधिकार अधिनियम के प्रावधानों एवं मांगी गई सूचना के अनुसार ही है। परन्तु आपने अपनी प्रथम अपील में यह कहा है कि अभी तक कोई सूचना प्राप्त नहीं कराई गई। जबकि केंद्रीय जन सूचना अधिकारी द्वारा पत्र दिनांक 21.09.2023 के द्वारा सूचना भेजी जा चुकी है। केंद्रीय जन सूचना अधिकारी द्वारा दी गई सूचना, दिनांक 21.09.2023 की प्रति, प्रथम अपील के आर्डर के साथ संलग्न की जा रही है I अतः केंद्रीय जन सूचना अधिकारी द्वारा प्रदान की गई सूचना तथ्यात्मक है और इसमें प्रथम अपीलीय अधिकारी के हस्तक्षेप की कोई आवश्यकता नहीं है। NA
935 CICOM/A/P/23/00152 Ms. ROOP AVTAR KAUR 03-10-2023 Ref RTI NO.- CICOM/R/P/23/00467 DECISION OF FIRST APPELLATE AUTHORITY: The First Appeal and the RTI application have been perused. In the instant case, CPIO (DR to IC-UM) is directed to reply to the RTI application as per the provisions of the RTI Act, 2005 by 31.10.2023, free of cost. The appeal is disposed of accordingly. NA
936 CICOM/A/E/23/00356 Ms. ROOP AVTAR KAUR 02-10-2023 Ref RTI No.- CICOM/R/E/23/01026 GROUNDS FOR FIRST APPEAL: The Appellant submitted first appeal stating that "Permission to file this First Appeal under RTI Act, 2005 is not required from CPIO of Central Information Commission after expiry of 30 days from 01.09.2023 as the specific time limit for providing information is 30 days as stipulated by RTI Act, 2005. Learned CPIO of Central Information Commission is utterly failed to provide required information within 30 days which is attracting mandatory Section 20 of RTI Act, 2005 for imposing penalty on learned CPIO. Therefore, this First Appellate Authority is prayed to recommend this case to Central Information Commission for imposing penalty on CPIO who utterly failed to provide information within 30 days from 01.09.2023. Therefore, this First Appeal under RTI Act, 2005 kindly be decided urgently after conducting urgent AC hearing." DECISION OF THE FIRST APPELLATE AUTHORITY: The First Appeal, RTI application and reply given by CPIO of CIC have been perused. The opportunity of written submission, for the first appeal, provided to the appellant is found to be reasonable opportunity of hearing. The written submissions made by the appellant in his first appeal application are found to be sufficient for consideration by the FAA to arrive at a decision under the RTI Act, 2005. Accordingly, it was felt that the personal hearing as requested by appellant was not necessary. In the instant case, CPIO (Legal Cell) is directed to revisit the RTI application and provide information as per available records, as per the provisions of the RTI Act, 2005 by 06.11.2023, free of cost. The appeal is disposed of accordingly. NA
937 CICOM/A/E/23/00355 Ms. ROOP AVTAR KAUR 01-10-2023 Ref RTI No.- CICOM/R/E/23/00894 GROUNDS FOR FIRST APPEAL: The Appellant submitted first appeal stating that "FACTS: A. CONTEXT: 1. Content of CIC Annual Report is prescribed u/s 25(3) of the RTI Act. Recommendations in respect of the particular public authorities are to be reported u/s 25(3)(g). 2. DOPT guidelines issued on 15.04.2013 (and again on 07.11.2019) require every Public Authority (PA) to submit Transparency Audit report to CIC every year and require the Commission to examine the reports and offer advice/recommendations. 3. In 2018-2019 CIC introduced grading and each CIC Annual Report since 2018-2019 lists PAs with grades in Annexure. 4. In 2019-2020 CIC developed software and each CIC Annual Report since 2019-2020 states that the Commission has given comments/recommendations through software to concerned PAs (Para-3.5.2: Transparency Audit). 5. The recommendations given through software to PAs are not reported in the Annual Reports. B. PRIOR REQUEST: 6. I had made request dated 03.10.2022 No. CICOM/R/E/22/00958 w.r.t para-3.5.2 of the then current Annual Report for 2020-2021 for: the URLs at which the recommendations given through software are accessible to public. 7. CIC M&R Section CPIO had informed: Information is for official use of PAs only. 8. My appeal No. CICOM/A/E/22/00249 for a reason from u/s 8 or 9 for the rejection was rejected on 28.10.2022 (w.r.t section 2(f)). C. PRESENT REQUEST: 9. I made request dated 04.08.2023 No. CICOM/R/E/23/00894 for: printouts from software of the recommendations given by the Commission through software to PAs, which are mentioned in para-3.5.2 but are nowhere reported u/s 25(3(g) of RTI Act in CIC Annual Report for 2021-22. 10. CIC Legal Cell CPIO informed: Record of Recommendations of Dy Registrar concerned on Transparency Audit report are shared with the PAs concerned through system. No record is available with this section. GROUNDS: A. The Commission is empowered u/s 25(5) to give recommendations and it is mandated u/s 25(3)(g) to report them in the Annual Report mandated u/s 25(1), i.e., the power u/s 25 is attached to pro-active disclosure mandates. CIC Secretariat, however, has neglected to publish the recommendations in CIC Annual Reports. It has also failed to make them available with its CPIOs. B. The power u/s 25(5) vests in the Commission (and may be autonomously exercised u/s 12(4) by the Chief Information Commissioner). Response of CPIO as well as circulars on CIC and DOPT websites show it has been decentralized to sub-registries of Information Commissioners. Information about the decentralization is not published u/s 4 on CIC website and fact of it seems unknown to CIC RTI Cell that forwarded my prior and present request to Secretariat CPIOs and not to the Deputy Registrars who are also designated CPIOs in CIC. REQUEST: Please provide printouts of the recommendations mentioned in CIC Annual Report para-3.5.2, preferably with your decision (as per the instructions for FAAs in part-V of the Guide u/s 26 of RTI Act). " DECISION OF THE FIRST APPELLATE AUTHORITY: The First Appeal, RTI application and reply given by CPIO of CIC have been perused. As per Section 2(f) of the RTI Act, 2005 only such information as is available and existing and held by the public authority or is under control of the public authority can be provided by a PIO. The PIO is not supposed to create or collate information that is not a part of the record. The Deputy Registrars do not have access to the recommendations given to the Public Authorities, once uploaded and submitted on the portal. Only the Nodal CPIO of the concerned Public Authority has access to the recommendation given. Hence, no intervention is required on behalf of the FAA in this matter. The appeal is disposed of accordingly. NA
938 CICOM/A/P/23/00148 Ms. ROOP AVTAR KAUR 26-09-2023 आर. टी. आई. आवेदन, प्रदान की गई सूचना एवं प्रथम अपील का अवलोकन किया गया, अतः केंद्रीय जन सूचना अधिकारी को निर्देश दिया जाता है कि इस आदेश के प्राप्ति के दस दिन के भीतर दिनांक 27.10.2023 तक आर.टी.आई. आवेदन सं. CICOM/R/P/23/00476 के तहत मांगी गई सूचना का अवलोकन कर अपीलकर्ता को पुनः स्पष्ट सूचना प्रेषित की जाये। NA
939 CICOM/A/P/23/00149 Ms. ROOP AVTAR KAUR 26-09-2023 आर. टी. आई. आवेदन, प्रदान की गई सूचना एवं प्रथम अपील का अवलोकन करने पर पाया गया कि अपीलकर्ता के आर.टी.आई. आवेदन सं. CICOM/R/P/23/00432 में सूचना मांगी थी जिसके प्रतिउत्तर में केंद्रीय जन सूचना अधिकारी द्वारा प्रेषित की गई सूचना, सूचना का अधिकार अधिनियम के प्रावधानों एवं मांगी गई सूचना के अनुसार ही है। परन्तु आपने अपनी प्रथम अपील में यह कहा है कि अभी तक कोई सूचना प्राप्त नहीं कराई गई। जबकि केंद्रीय जन सूचना अधिकारी द्वारा पत्र दिनांक 22.08.2023 के द्वारा सूचना भेजी जा चुकी है। केंद्रीय जन सूचना अधिकारी द्वारा दी गई सूचना, दिनांक 22.08.2023 की प्रति, प्रथम अपील के आर्डर के साथ संलग्न की जा रही है I अतः केंद्रीय जन सूचना अधिकारी द्वारा प्रदान की गई सूचना तथ्यात्मक है और इसमें प्रथम अपीलीय अधिकारी के हस्तक्षेप की कोई आवश्यकता नहीं है। NA
940 CICOM/A/E/23/00354 Ms. ROOP AVTAR KAUR 25-09-2023 Ref RTI No.- CICOM/R/E/23/01028 GROUNDS FOR FIRST APPEAL: The Appellant submitted first appeal stating that "The PIO has not mentioned in the reply for point number 4 that which division of DoPT deals with the RTI Matters (name of nodal division of DoPT for RTI Matters). For point number 5 PIO has stated that nil report is submitted (the PIO has not clarified that what NIL REPORT actually means) The FAA is requested to provide the information requested by the applicant." DECISION OF THE FIRST APPELLATE AUTHORITY: The First Appeal, RTI application and reply given by CPIO of CIC have been perused. As per Section 2(f) of the RTI Act, 2005 only such information as is available and existing and held by the public authority or is under control of the public authority can be provided by a PIO. The PIO is not supposed to create or collate information that is not a part of the record. For Point 4- As per the Section 6(1) of the RTI Act, 2005, the applicant shall file information request with the concerned Public Authority which holds the information. So the concerned Public Authority may be approached for the requisite information. For Point 5- Nil Report means that information is Nil. The appeal is disposed of accordingly. NA